Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Panamera vs Taycan drag race: Triple Threat

    Porsche reserves the Turbo S moniker only for the quickest models in the range. We bring three of them together to see which will win.

    Published On Aug 24, 2023 09:00:00 AM

    10,663 Views

    Recently, we compared Porsche's two Turbo S super sedans – the Panamera and Taycan – to see how they compared on the highway, in the city and on a twisty section of road. For its uncompromising and brutal efficiency, the Taycan came across as a bit clinical compared to the more emotional Panamera, but the real celebration is now. We've borrowed a runway for a precious short while to decide once and for all which is the quickest Turbo S of them all. 

    Okay, I admit, the Pan will probably lose this to the EV, but it doesn’t take a Porsche enthusiast to know that there is another Turbo S in the line-up. The original giant slayer itself, the 911 Turbo S. The Taycan’s power output rises to 761hp (from 625hp) with launch control, but the 911’s 650hp comfortably eclipses the Panamera and at 1,640kg, it weighs several hundred kilograms less than both. I know I’m in the slowest car here, but which will come first?

    Launch control is as simple as it can get. The trio shoots off the blocks with violent efficiency, all 12 tyres yanking hard at the tarmac with no wasteful wheelspin. Through my windscreen and my concentration, I see the other two peel away, but I’m not prepared for just how comprehensively the 911 obliterates us both. Lucky launch? We run again, and again, and again, but the result is the same. I even get a jump on the Taycan a few times, but it’s not enough to change the result at the end of the quarter mile. You’d think maybe the EV would own the first few metres at least, but no. It’s pure 911 dominance. The sedans clocked 0-100kph times a few tenths behind Porsche’s claims; the 911 beat it by 0.3sec. What a day at the office!

    Porsche Turbo S acceleration
    911TaycanPanamera
    0-10kph0.23sec0.28sec0.33sec
    0-20kph0.44sec0.55sec0.64sec
    0-30kph0.61sec0.77sec0.92sec
    0-40kph0.78sec1.03sec1.18sec
    0-50kph1.03sec1.28sec1.44sec
    0-60kph1.24sec1.57sec1.74sec
    0-70kph1.44sec1.88sec2.08sec
    0-80kph1.76sec2.23sec2.48sec
    0-90kph2.09sec2.61sec2.88sec
    0-100kph2.43sec3.02sec3.35sec
    0-110kph2.86sec3.47sec3.91sec
    0-120kph3.23sec3.99sec4.49sec
    0-130kph3.72sec4.54sec5.13sec
    0-140kph4.23sec5.14sec5.79sec
    0-150kph4.78sec5.86sec6.56sec
    0-160kph5.48sec6.58sec7.43sec
    0-170kph6.19sec7.39sec8.34sec
    0-180kph6.94sec8.33sec9.29sec
    0-190kph7.64sec9.27sec10.36sec
    0-200kph8.51sec10.38secNA
    Quarter mile10.22 sec at 219.24kph10.98 sec at 205.53kph11.44 sec at 199.37kph

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    15.07%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.48%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.00%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.44%

    Total Votes : 1924
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe