Mahbubnagar

•6w

Hi, I am planning to buy an electric vehicle and am considering the Mahindra XUV 3XO EV. Since it offers more cabin space and a taller seating position than the Tata Nexon EV, it seems like a better fit for my needs. What are your thoughts on the XUV 3XO EV? Would you recommend it over the Tata Nexon EV?

•6w

The Mahindra XUV 3XO EV does have a roomier cabin and benefits from the latest 3XO interior, improved ergonomics and a long features list. However, underneath, it is essentially a facelifted XUV400. It carries over the same 39.4kWh battery pack, 150hp motor and front-wheel-drive powertrain, rather than using Mahindra's newer INGLO architecture seen on the BE 6 and XEV 9e. Mahindra itself positions it as the replacement for the XUV400.

That means you're buying a car with a much-improved body and cabin, but not an all-new EV platform. The battery size and real-world range also lag behind some newer rivals, so while performance remains strong, the underlying technology doesn't move the segment forward.

If your choice is strictly between the XUV 3XO EV and the Tata Nexon EV, we'd still lean towards the Nexon EV. This Tata car benefits from a more modern dedicated EV architecture, offers larger battery options, longer range and has matured into a well-rounded package over successive updates. The XUV 3XO EV's biggest advantage is its more spacious cabin, but that alone isn't enough to outweigh the Nexon's more contemporary electric underpinnings.

If you're open to looking beyond these two, the MG Windsor EV remains our top recommendation in this price bracket. It feels like a segment above in terms of cabin space, comfort and overall value, making it the most compelling family electric car unless your requirement is for a more compact SUV.

Explore cars mentioned

Mahindra

XUV 3XO EV

from ₹14.73 Lakh

Mahindra

XEV 9e

from ₹23.33 Lakh

Tata

Nexon EV

from ₹13.25 Lakh

Windsor

from ₹14.95 Lakh

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

•4w•

I was one of the first adapters of the Tata Nexon EV LR and I have also recently purchased the Mahindra XUV 3XO EV AX7L. Let me be completely honest, the Mahindra is a far superior car compared to the Tata, in each and every aspect, that I as a consumer focus on:- 1) Material Quality 2) Salient Features (Driver Focussed) 3) Driving Experience 4) Battery Efficiency I averaged a battery efficiency of around 5-6 Km/Wh on a average in the Nexon, but the 3XO average has been:- 1) Same speed city cruising (Under 80kmph) 8-10 km/Wh 2) Highway (Under 110Kmph) 6.5-8km/Wh 3) Normal - Heavy City Traffic Summer - 5-6Km/Wh Colder Weather 6.0-7.5km/Wh 4) Extremely Heavy City Traffic Summer - 4-6Km/Wh Colder Weather 5.5-7.5km/Wh So it would be safe to say that under mixed driving conditions you get 7-7.5 Km/Wh that usually gives me a range of 280-300km I have not faced a single software glitch, motor issue or any sort of malfunction in the 3XO till date. I would call it the best 16L I have ever spent. Altough getting a Sun Film or heat rejection PPF for the car is a must for the sunroof. The ADAS works like a charm. The car has some amazing salient features like the small animations on the drivers display and gear lever, or the full screen mode layout functions on the drivers display. Although the most irritating thing in the AX7L is the chrome lining around the interior rear view mirror, it blinds you from certain angles. The biggest con is probably, Mahindra's service centres.Tata was not great either, but was definitely better than Mahindra.

More posts on similar cars

•5h

MG's ZS EV and Tata's Nexon EV keep getting cross-shopped despite being fairly different in size and positioning. Why do buyers even put these two in the same comparison list.

•2d

I want to buy a new car with a budget of around Rs. 15 lakh. I am open to either diesel or EV options. My annual running is around 12,000 km, including 4-5 highway trips a year. I have a family of four adults. Which car and variant should I consider?

•1d

Given your requirements, the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel is the most sensible recommendation. The diesel engine is efficient and well suited to your usage pattern, and the 3XO is one of the most spacious compact SUVs, with a wide rear bench that comfortably accommodates four adults. It also offers a good balance of ride comfort and highway stability, making it well suited to your occasional long-distance trips.The diesel engine will help keep running costs in check over time, and the 3XO is a well-rounded package with strong safety credentials and a good feature set for the price. The only real drawback is that the boot is on the smaller side for the segment, so if you regularly travel with a lot of luggage, you may need to plan accordingly.If you are open to an EV and have home charging available, the Tata Nexon EV is worth considering as a city-friendly alternative, but given your highway usage and annual running, the diesel 3XO is the more practical and cost-effective choice.

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Tata Nexon EV

•3d

I’m currently driving a Honda City MT i-VTEC as my daily driver in the city, but I’m not happy with its mileage. My daily usage in the city is around 20-30 km. I’ve shortlisted the Kia Seltos MT Diesel and MG Windsor. Please suggest which of these would be the better choice. Thanks.

•2d

With a daily city usage of 20-30 km, a diesel Seltos is not the right choice. Modern diesels need regular highway runs to keep the DPF healthy, and your usage pattern is predominantly short city trips. The fuel savings from diesel will also take a very long time to justify the higher purchase cost at your running.If you can arrange for home charging, the MG Windsor EV seems to be a better fit for your usage. This MG car is a very spacious, comfortable family car with a premium feel. Since your usage isn't much, you could consider the small battery version instead of the Pro - it'll be more affordable.

Kia Seltos

MG Windsor

View all Posts

Expert reviews worth reading

Popular discussions right now

•4d

I am planning to buy a new car under 20-25 lakh for the next ten years. I have considered two cars Seltos DCT GTX(A) and Kushaq 1.5 Monte Carlo DSG but am afraid of the mileage and if I go with an EV, I am afraid that infrastructure will not be that good. I drive daily for 10-15 km and take 2-3 trips in a year on highway. Should I buy the car now or wait for Seltos Hybrid? Will it cost an additional 2-3 lakh or will it be value for money for my driving. Should I consider another car?

•4d

With a daily running of just 10-15 km and only a few highway trips a year, fuel efficiency and long-term reliability should be your top priorities. The Seltos DCT GTX+ and Kushaq 1.5 DSG Monte Carlo are both excellent cars, but their turbo-petrol engines and dual-clutch gearboxes are not the most efficient or the most stress-free choices for predominantly short city runs. The DCT/DSG gearboxes are at their best on open roads, and in stop-start city traffic they can feel a bit jerky and are not as smooth or as durable as a torque converter automatic over the long term.The Seltos hybrid is worth waiting for if you are not in a hurry. It is expected to be priced roughly Rs. 2-3 lakh above the equivalent petrol variant, and for your usage pattern it will make more sense than the turbo-petrol DCT. Hybrids deliver their biggest efficiency gains in city driving, and over a 10-year ownership period the fuel savings and smoother driving experience will more than justify the premium.If you want to buy now, the Kia Seltos IVT (naturally aspirated petrol with CVT) is the better choice for your usage. It is smooth, reliable and well suited to city driving, and you will not be paying a premium for performance you will rarely use. The Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI with the torque converter automatic is another good option if you prefer a more engaging driving experience, but the Seltos IVT is the more refined and hassle-free choice.EVs are not the right fit for you at the moment given your concerns about charging infrastructure and your low daily running. The savings are not significant enough to justify the compromises.

Kia Seltos

Skoda Kushaq

•1d

I currently drive a Grand i10 Manual petrol and am now planning to buy a new compact SUV that is comfortable, fuel efficient and has low maintenance. My usage is 35km of daily office commute in Delhi-NCR traffic. Please advice which option is best fit amongst Hyundai Venue HX 6T, SONET HTK+O and XUV 3XO.

•1d

Go for the Hyundai Venue. With your daily 35km commute in Delhi NCR traffic, comfort and low maintenance are key, and the Venue delivers on both. The 1.2 NA petrol is smooth, refined and easy to drive in stop-start conditions, while Hyundai’s service network and ownership experience are among the best in the segment. The HX6T variant also gives you a good balance of features without pushing the budget too far.The Sonet HTK+O is mechanically very similar, but the Venue is a newer model and offers a more spacious cabin. The XUV 3XO is also a good option, but its turbo petrol engine won't be as efficient as the Hyundai’s.Overall, the Venue is the most sensible upgrade from your Grand i10 for daily city use.

I’m planning to buy my first car and would appreciate some suggestions. My budget is around Rs. 13-15 lakh ex-showroom, and I’m planning to register the car under the BH series. Safety is my top priority, so I strongly prefer a car with a 5-star safety rating, preferably from Global NCAP. An automatic transmission is a must. The car will mainly be used for weekend family trips and highway drives rather than daily commuting. Since it will be a family car, I’d prefer something that looks classy and elegant while offering good comfort. A premium-looking interior would be a plus, and features such as leather/leatherette upholstery and ventilated seats would be nice to have, but they aren't deal-breakers. At the same time, I don’t want a car that is purely comfort-oriented. I enjoy driving, so I’d like something with a good engine, enjoyable handling, and a fun-to-drive character. Good rear-seat comfort and reasonable luggage space for family trips would also be appreciated.

•3d

Based on your requirements, the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI automatic is the recommendation. It strikes the right balance between safety, driving enjoyment and family usability. The 1.0 TSI engine is strong, the handling is engaging, and the car feels solid and confidence-inspiring on the highway. The interior feels premium, and while it may not be the largest in its segment, overall comfort is quite good. If you prefer the look of the VW Taigun, it offers largely the same experience as the Kushaq. The Renault Duster 1.3 DCT is also a strong alternative, offering excellent driving dynamics and a larger cabin. Overall, though, the Kushaq 1.0 TSI automatic is the car that best aligns with your requirements.

Skoda Kushaq

Volkswagen Taigun

Renault Duster

View all Posts