Autocar India
GA

Govind Agrawal

38w

Is the MG ZS EV executive variant a good option, looking at current offers (95000/- company offer and 150000/- subsidy total ex showroom price 1550000/- approx.) as compared with the Nexon EV fearless variant.

Anshuman Singh

Anshuman Singh

Verified
38w

The MG ZS EV has been on sale in its current form since 2020, and while it remains a good, no-nonsense electric SUV, it’s beginning to show its age — especially against the newer, more advanced EVs in its price bracket. Tata, on the other hand, has continually updated the Nexon EV over the years, and in its latest iteration, it feels far more in tune with the times.

Between the two, the Nexon is the stronger choice. That said, if your budget allows, the MG Windsor EV or the Hyundai Creta Electric are both more modern, more appealing, and overall better-rounded options.

The on-road price of the MG Windsor EV in Yavatmal ranges between Rs 16.21 lakh and Rs 20.91 lakh, whereas the Creta Electric price falls between Rs 20.79 lakh and Rs 27.11 lakh.

More questions on similar cars

MP

Mayu Patil

17h

I am planning to buy a new SUV with a budget of ₹12-14 lakh and am confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX Petrol and the Skoda Kylaq Manual Petrol. My monthly running is quite high at around 2,500 km, including approximately 1,600 km on highways and 800 km in the city. Which of these offers better real-world mileage in such driving conditions? Which would be more cost-effective for long-term maintenance, considering the high yearly running? With an annual usage of nearly 30,000 km, should I continue with these petrol options, or would the diesel XUV 3XO be a more logical and financially sensible choice?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
13h

With a Rs 12-14 lakh budget, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 diesel manual is the smarter pick for you because your running is high and most of it is on open roads where a diesel saves a lot of fuel. On your first question, between the two petrols you named - the Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol and the Skoda Kylaq - the Kylaq 1.0 TSI manual usually gives slightly better real-world mileage on long highway drives if you cruise at steady speeds. In city use, they’re closer, and of course choosing the automatic gearbox of either will lower the mileage figures further. Turbo petrols in general are highly sensitive to your driving style when it comes to the real-world mileage they deliver. But Mahindra tends to prioritise performance over fuel economy in its engines.On long-term costs, Skoda has 15,000km service gaps, so you’d likely do two services a year. Mahindra typically calls you in a little sooner, so you may do three. Per visit, Skoda parts and fluids can be a touch pricier, while Mahindra parts are usually cheaper, and the network is wider. Over 30,000km a year, the rupee-per-km on the two petrols ends up similar, with a slight edge to Mahindra.Given your third point, yes - at 30,000 km a year, the XUV 3XO diesel manual makes stronger financial sense. It will use a lot less fuel on highways and has an easy pull for overtaking. The only caveat is that diesel cars have a soot filter that requires regular highway runs to regenerate or clean. But your usage pattern suits this well. Overall, for your mix, the 3XO diesel fits best.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleSkoda Kylaq
MR

Murali Ramamurthy

2d

With four passengers, a fully loaded boot, the AC running, and driving conditions that include broken roads, ghats, and highways, which car performs better, the Citroen C3X Turbo AT or the Skoda Kylaq AT? If possible, please provide a back-to-back comparison review as well.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
14h

Both perform very well for your requirements, but overall, the Skoda Kylaq is the better choice. The Citroen C3 X has a slightly comfier ride quality, its AC performance is very strong, and its 1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine is quite punchy. However, the Kylaq's 1.0 TSI engine is more powerful, and the 6-speed automatic gearbox has been tuned for even greater responses. As such, it will feel more eager on ghats and highways. It too has excellent suspension and absorbs bumps and broken roads well. Moreover, the Kylaq sits in a segment above and hence offers more space in the back seat and the boot, which will be useful for your passengers and luggage. Moreover, the build quality is stronger, the interior feels more upmarket, and though it may be more expensive, there are more features on offer than in the Citroen. Hence, we recommend that you go with the Skoda.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleCitroen C3
AB

AB

20h

Hi, I am looking to buy a midsize SUV and am confused between the Kia Seltos and Hyundai Creta, both in automatic variants. However, I am slightly inclined towards the Creta because of Hyundai’s brand value and its stronger resale value. My running is quite low, and we usually take the car out only twice a week for leisure drives. Could you please help me decide which would be the better option for my usage?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
15h

You should consider the Hyundai Creta 1.5 petrol IVT automatic for your needs. The 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol engine is smooth and refined, and paired with the seamless CVT automatic, it makes for a calm and stress-free driving experience. And since your running is low, petrol makes more sense than diesel. Compared to the Kia Seltos, the Creta rides a touch softer, which you'll appreciate on your long drives. Hyundai’s dealer network and resale value are also strong, so your ownership will be simple, and you’ll likely get a bit more back when you sell later.A couple of trade-offs to note. The IVT is tuned for smoothness, not speed, so it won’t feel as quick as the turbo-petrol DCT versions. Also, the Seltos is a bit larger and has a more premium interior than the Creta. So if that's what you're looking for, then a Seltos makes sense, as both SUVs are mechanically identical.

VehicleHyundai Creta
VehicleKia Seltos

Popular discussions right now

PS

P S RAHUL

1w

I am 60 years old and have booked the Toyota Innova Hycross top-end variant. My usage will be mostly within the city, along with 4-5 long trips every year. Is this the right choice for my needs, or should I consider any other options? I plan to continue doing long-distance drives comfortably over the next 10 years.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

You want a car that is comfortable in the city, easy to drive and capable of doing long trips for the next 10 years. The Toyota Innova Hycross fits this very well. The hybrid system makes it very smooth and quiet in city driving, and the automatic gearbox is effortless, which becomes more important with age. On highways, it is stable, comfortable and built for long-distance travel, which is what the Innova name has always stood for.What really works in your favour is long-term ownership. Toyota’s reliability, strong service network and resale value make it one of the safest bets if you plan to keep the car for many years. The Hycross also offers excellent space, easy ingress and egress and a comfortable ride, which are important for everyday use and for passengers as you grow older.

VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
PS

Peasant Sampan

6d

Hello Autocar, I am planning to buy a sedan, with almost 90% city usage. Please suggest a suitable option. Also, is it true that for my usage, naturally aspirated (NA) engines are better suited than turbo-petrol engines?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

For your usage, a naturally aspirated petrol with a CVT or IVT is the best fit. These setups are smoother, easier to drive in traffic and more predictable, which matters far more in city conditions than outright performance. So yes, in your case, NA engines are better suited than turbo petrol.The Hyundai Verna IVT stands out as the most well-rounded option for city driving. The engine is smooth, the IVT gearbox is very intuitive in stop-and-go traffic, and the overall driving experience is effortless. It feels refined and easy to live with daily.The Honda City Hybrid is worth considering if your running is high. It offers excellent fuel efficiency, strong performance and is very easy to drive in the city thanks to its hybrid system. However, it comes with a higher upfront cost, and the battery placement results in a higher boot floor, which slightly affects practicality.Compared to the Verna, the standard Honda City CVT is also an option, but the engine feels a bit noisier, and the gearbox is not as intuitive as the Verna’s IVT in everyday use.

VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleHonda City
RA

ram

3d

Hi, I am a bit confused about whether I should wait for the Maruti Brezza facelift or go ahead and buy the Kia Seltos HTE(O) or the Hyundai Creta E Summer Edition.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Going by your shortlist, you want a bigger family car on a tight budget and are looking at base trims. If you need the car in the next couple of months for mostly city use with some weekend trips, pick the Kia Seltos HTE (O) IVT. It is well equipped and, compared to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, gives you more back-seat space and boot room.The Brezza update will be relatively minor, though we expect the 1.5 NA engine to make way for the 1.0 turbo-petrol from the Fronx. Waiting for it only makes sense if you mainly drive in tight city areas and want an easier-to-park car.Overall, for a near-term purchase and everyday comfort, the Seltos lines up best with what you’re considering.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx

Posted on: 14 Aug 2025