SC recalls order allowing extended sale of BS4 models

    The Supreme Court bench observed that automobile dealers association have not followed its earlier order and have violated the court's directives.

    Published On Jul 10, 2020 01:07:00 PM


    SC recalls order allowing extended sale of BS4 models

    Image used for representation only.

    • Supreme Court says March 27 directives violated
    • Details of BS4 vehicles sold after March 31 that have not been uploaded on the government’s e-Vahan portal will not be registered
    • Automobile dealers associations say less than 10 percent of unsold BS4 inventory were sold within 10 days of the lockdown lifting

    On Wednesday, the Supreme Court recalled its March 27 order, which had allowed the sale of BS4 vehicles for 10 days across India - except in Delhi-NCR - after the lifting of COVID-19-induced lockdowns. The SC bench observed that the automobile dealers association has not followed its earlier order, and has violated the court's directives.

    Based on a report by PTI, the bench observed that sales of BS4 models had increased in the last week of March, when the nationwide lockdown was in force, and there were online transactions as well. The recall of the older directive is expected to impact registration of many of these vehicles. The Court asked the automobile dealers association to furnish details of vehicles sold by them to the government. The bench will conduct a hearing on the matter on July 23.

    Warning the automobile dealers to not take advantage of the apex court by ‘playing fraud’, a bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra observed that its earlier directives have been violated and BS4 vehicles were sold during the lockdown in last week of March and after March 31 also. While hearing the matter through video-conferencing, the bench - also comprising Justices S A Nazeer and Indira Banerjee - said, "Do not take advantage of this court by playing fraud."

    The bench said BS4 vehicles sold after March 31 and those models whose details have not been uploaded to the government’s e-Vahan portal will not be registered. On March 27, the apex court had permitted the sale of 10 percent of unsold BS4 vehicles to make up for the six days lost due to the nationwide lockdown, which was imposed on March 25.

    The Supreme Court observed that details of more than 17,000 vehicles have not been uploaded on the government's e-Vahan portal. The bench said it would ask the government to check the e-Vahan data and would allow registration of those BS4 vehicles whose details are uploaded on the portal till March 31. It also asked the government to provide data of vehicles that were uploaded on the e-Vahan portal after 31 March.

    As per an affidavit filed by an automobile dealers association in the top court, less than 10 percent of unsold inventory of BS4 vehicles was sold within 10 days of lifting of the lockdown. It said that orders passed by the apex court in October 2018 and March 27 this year have been complied with, and there "is no flouting" of the directives. It also provides the data regarding uploading of data on the e-Vahan portal till March 31, this year.

    On June 15, the apex court had made it clear that no sale and registration of BS4 vehicles would be permitted in the country and pulled up the automobile dealers association for violating its earlier order that had given some limited relaxation.

    The Supreme Court noted that as per the compliance affidavit filed regarding its March 27 order, more than 2,25,000 vehicles were awaiting registration as on March 31. This exceeded the figure which it had specified. It had allowed registration of 1.05 lakh two-wheelers, 2,250 passenger cars and 2,000 commercial vehicles that were sold, but not registered, across the country.

    In March this year, the apex court was informed about the unsold inventory of BS4 vehicles - around seven lakh two wheelers, 15,000 passenger cars and 12,000 commercial vehicles. It was told that there were 1,05,000 two-wheelers, 2,250 passenger cars and 2,000 commercial vehicles that were sold but not registered throughout the country. The top court had then ordered that vehicles, which were sold but not registered, be registered by the authorities by April 30.

    Also see:

    IRDAI withdraws long-term own damage cover for motor vehicle insurance

    Road travel in the time of COVID-19

    FMSCI clarifies Indian 2020 racing season won’t be cancelled

    Chinese companies barred from highway project bids in India

    Copyright (c) Autocar Professional. All rights reserved.



    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    Tata is considering separate showrooms for EVs, do you think all carmakers should do this?

    Yes, EV buyers have distinct needs



    Yes, it shows a strong commitment to EVs



    No, splitting showrooms creates inconvenience



    No, it will dilute the brand



    Total Votes : 592
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe