Why thermal management is a key to cutting charging times

    One of the biggest challenges faced by EV manufacturers today is managing the heat generated when charging; the higher the charge rate of batteries the hotter they get during charging

    Published On Oct 25, 2020 07:00:00 AM

    11,107 Views

    Why thermal management is a key to cutting charging times

    With the arrival of 800V, 350kW ultra-rapid chargers in Europe, what else is needed to reduce the time spent at charging points during those longer journeys? One of the biggest challenges facing EV developers is effectively managing the heat generated by a battery pack during charging.

    Lithium-ion battery packs that power EVs are constructed from the same small building blocks, the cells, used in domestic products. A single, bog-standard lithium-ion cell is pretty small, producing in the region of 3.6V and having an electrical capacity of maybe 3.4Ah (Ampere-hours). To increase the voltage to 400 or 800 for an EV, hundreds of cells are connected in groups (parallel series connections) that multiply both, the voltage and the capacity.

    What matters to the EV driver, though, is the C-rate of the battery, which describes the rate at which it can be charged and discharged, relative to its capacity. The higher the C-rate at which a battery can be charged, the less time this will take, but one of the major limitations is the heat generated by internal resistance as charging takes place. Charge a phone or power tool battery and it becomes hot to the touch. Charge an EV battery made up of hundreds or even thousands of separate cells in multiple modules and a huge amount of heat is generated, which can be hard to get rid of.

    To deal with that, lithium-ion EV battery packs are liquid-cooled with either water or water and glycol. The fluid is then cooled by a heat-exchanger or refrigerated but, either way, the heat energy can be used for another job, such as heating the car’s interior.

    An example is the battery pack of the Audi E-tron, in which coolant is pumped through channels in extruded aluminium cold plates. The individual cells are mounted on a gel that conducts heat from them into the cold plates and then to the coolant. This is just one method, though; there are others. Tesla’s, for example, consists of cooling tubes interleaved between the cylindrical cells in the battery pack.

    In general, cells produce around three times more heat when charging than when driving, and the faster the charging, the greater the amount of heat generated. Indirect cooling has its limitations, because heat is removed from the cells only at the points of contact with the cooling system’s plates or tubes. However, a collaborative project involving M&I Materials, WMG and Ricardo hopes to improve on that. Initiated in July 2019 under the UK government’s Faraday Battery Challenge, the project, called I-CoBat, is scheduled to finish in November 2020.

    The project aims to develop a new immersive cooling method whereby the cells and connectors are literally immersed in a biodegradable and dielectric (meaning it doesn’t conduct electricity) fluid developed by M&I Materials, called Mivolt. Because the fluid is in contact with the whole cell surface, it’s hoped that immersive cooling will reduce EV charging times (by allowing significantly higher C-rates), increase range and slow the ageing process through more accurate thermal management of the battery pack.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.75%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.49%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.81%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.95%

    Total Votes : 1062
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe