Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

Posted inGeneral Buying Advice

•15h

I am planning to buy a car with a budget of Rs 10-12 lakh. My daily commute would be roughly 8-120km. Which fuel type should I choose?

•5m

Your daily commute range of 8-120km is simply too wide to give you a definitive answer. If your running is closer to 8km a day with occasional 120km drives, then petrol is the sensible choice. If you are consistently doing 120km a day, you are looking at over 30,000km a year, diesel car becomes the more economical option.

If your usage is mixed and unpredictable, petrol cars or even CNG cars could be a safe bet. Modern diesel cars need to be driven a fair bit to ensure their DPFs don't get clogged up.

Alternatively, if you can arrange for home charging, get an electric car instead. Your running costs will be very low, and your drive experience will be extremely smooth. In your budget, the Tata Punch EV is a good buy.

Punch EV

Get Best Offers

More posts on similar cars

•1d

I want to buy my first car in 2027, and I am yet to learn how to drive. My daily commute is around 25 km in the city, with occasional highway trips. I am considering an EV within a budget of Rs. 15-18 lakh. What are my best options?

138

•10h

Since this will be your first car, we'd suggest you consider the Tata Punch EV for its compact size. Its high seating and SUV-like driving position will help you get a good judgment of the edges of the car, and being compact, it'll be easy to park and manoeuvre in traffic. Moreover, the Punch EV delivers respectable real-world range; it is smooth to drive; and it has all the features you'd expect in a car of this price.Alternatively, you could consider a Kia Syros EV that's compact with exceptional cabin space thanks to its excellent packaging. It will be much pricier, but it is certainly worth serious consideration.An MG Windsor is also a competent offering which is extremely spacious and has a huge boot. But do keep in mind that the Windsor is deceptively large in size, which, as a new driver, might not be as easy to drive and park.

•3d

Hi Autocar Team, I own a Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara AT (non-hybrid) and spend around Rs. 12,000-14,000 per month on petrol. Its city mileage has dropped from around 13 kmpl to 10 kmpl. I also have solar panels at home, so EV charging would be almost free or cost a maximum of Rs. 3-4 per unit. I am confused about whether I should replace the Grand Vitara with an EV or keep it and buy a Tata Tiago EV for daily city use. Am I thinking too much about fuel savings? Should I simply keep the Grand Vitara and avoid buying a second car altogether? I would like to hear from people who have been in a similar situation. What makes more financial sense in the long run?

165

•11h

You are not overthinking it. With solar at home and a monthly fuel spend of Rs 12-14k, switching to an EV makes strong financial sense. The question is whether to replace the Grand Vitara or add a Tiago EV as a second car.If your usage is predominantly city-based, replacing the Grand Vitara with an EV is the better solution. You eliminate fuel costs almost entirely, simplify ownership and make full use of your solar setup. If you have the budget for it, EVs like the Kia Syros EV, Hyundai Creta Electric or Kia Carens Clavis EV are a good mix of price to range. Or if you can budget for it, move a step up to the Mahindra XEV 9S, Tata Sierra EV or MG Tomahawk EV.Adding a Tiago EV as a second car only makes sense if you have a genuine need for two cars. The Tiago EV is a great city runabout, but keeping the Grand Vitara just for occasional use while continuing to pay insurance, maintenance and depreciation does not make financial sense unless you regularly need a second car.If you are happy with the Grand Vitara and do not want to change cars, that is also a perfectly valid decision. But from a purely financial perspective, with your fuel spend and solar setup, switching to an electric car is the smarter long-term move.

•20h

Tesla just showed a car flying in the air! This car performs mid-air flips and even jumps over other cars. Is this the future of cars?

170

•16h

No, this is not the future of cars. What you saw was a marketing stunt, not a production feature. Tesla's demonstration was designed to grab attention, draw investment and showcase the car's performance potential in a dramatic way, but it does not reflect real-world driving or what owners can expect from their vehicles.Modern cars are engineered with a strong focus on safety, reliability and everyday usability. The idea of cars performing mid-air flips or jumping over other vehicles is completely at odds with how cars are designed and regulated. In fact, such behaviour would be extremely dangerous on public roads and would never be permitted under any safety standards.Tesla's cars are impressive in their own right, with strong acceleration and advanced technology, but the flying car demonstration is purely theatrical. The future of cars is far more likely to be shaped by advancements in safety, efficiency, electrification and driver assistance systems, rather than by Hollywood-style stunts.

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Curated collections

Cars under ₹15L

101 CARS

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•1w

I currently own a Jeep Compass and want to get an additional car for my father, with good reliability, unlike the Jeep. My father still drives a 2008 Honda City, and I am torn between a few choices: the Honda City, Skoda Slavia, Nissan Tekton and Toyota Hyryder. Or should I wait for the Virtus facelift or the new-generation Creta? His usage is low, at almost 500 km per month. Please suggest.

1.8k

•5d

With just 500km a month, petrol is the clear choice, and reliability and ease of ownership become the most important factors. The Honda City is the safest recommendation here. It is a proven product with a strong reliability record, a comfortable ride and a familiar ownership experience that your father will appreciate, especially coming from a 2008 City. The Skoda Slavia and Volkswagen Virtus are both excellent to drive, but the 1.0 TSI engine can feel a bit laggy at low speeds, and the 1.5 TSI is overkill for this kind of usage. The Nissan Tekton is a good value proposition, but engines are not responsive at low speeds and Nissan's service network is not as strong as Honda's, which matters more for a low-running, long-term ownership scenario. The Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder is a solid option if you specifically want an SUV, but the hybrid premium does not make financial sense at this running, and the naturally aspirated petrol is not as refined as the City's engine. The new-generation Hyundai Creta is worth waiting for only if your father specifically wants an SUV; otherwise, the City remains the more sensible choice. Overall, the Honda City is the most reliable, comfortable and hassle-free option for your father's usage.

•4d

I want a foreign-made SUV. I currently own an Elevate and now, I want another one. Can you guide me whether I should go with Skoda Kushaq, Hyundai Creta or Volkswagen Taigun?

481

•3d

Since you already own a Honda Elevate and are looking for a foreign-made SUV, the decision really comes down to what you want from your second car. The Skoda Kushaq and Volkswagen Taigun are essentially the same car underneath, so the choice between them is more about brand preference and dealership experience. Both are excellent to drive, with strong turbo petrol engines and a more engaging driving experience than the Creta. The Kushaq tends to offer slightly better value for money, while the Taigun has a marginally more premium interior feel.The Hyundai Creta, on the other hand, is the safer, more rounded choice. It is more comfortable, has a wider service network and is generally easier to live with over the long term. It may not be as engaging to drive as the Skoda or Volkswagen, but it is the more sensible ownership proposition.If you are looking for a car that feels different from your Elevate and enjoy driving, go for the Skoda Kushaq. If you want a hassle-free ownership experience, the Hyundai Creta is the better choice.

•1w

I’ve almost finalised the Skoda Kylaq Signature Automatic, and I really like the car. However, I’m a little worried about Skoda’s long-term service and maintenance costs, especially after the warranty period. I’m planning to keep the car for around 7–8 years. Would you recommend taking the Service Maintenance Package (SMP) along with the car? Is it worth the additional cost considering regular servicing and potential maintenance expenses? Also, compared with the Brezza and Nexon, how is the Kylaq Signature Automatic in terms of long-term reliability, service costs and parts replacement? Would really appreciate your advice before I make the final purchase decision.

1.3k

•4d

If you like the Skoda Kylaq Signature Automatic, go ahead and buy it. It is a genuinely good car and one of the best driver’s cars in the segment. The 1.0 TSI engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is a proven combination, and Skoda’s reliability has improved significantly in recent years. The bigger concern is not reliability but long-term maintenance costs, which can be higher than Maruti or Tata once the car is out of warranty.This is where the Service Maintenance Package (SMP) makes sense. It locks in your service costs for the first 4-5 years, covers all scheduled maintenance and gives you peace of mind during the most expensive ownership period. If you are planning to keep the car for 7-8 years, it is worth the additional cost because it protects you from unexpected bills and helps you budget ownership costs more accurately.Compared to the Brezza and Nexon, the Kylaq is the better driver’s car with a more engaging driving experience and a stronger engine. The Brezza is the benchmark for long-term reliability and low maintenance costs, while the Nexon sits somewhere in between. The Kylaq is not unreliable, but parts and service can be more expensive once you are out of warranty.If you are buying the Kylaq, take the SMP and enjoy the car. If long-term ownership costs are your absolute priority, the Brezza is the safer financial choice.

View all Posts

Explore more posts in topics

•20h

Tesla just showed a car flying in the air! This car performs mid-air flips and even jumps over other cars. Is this the future of cars?

170

•2d

Hi, please advice me on the BMW M340i as I am planning to buy it.

243

•2d

I am planning to buy Kushaq Sportline. Will it be a good buy for driving in city and on highway?

216

•1d

Bayon could be an interesting option for people who find Venue a bit small and Creta too expensive. But with so many SUVs already available, what would make you choose Bayon?

234

•1d

Is buying Punch under 10 lakh a good choice?

140

•1d

Hi, I own Volkswagen Virtus. Previously, I strictly used XP95 to meet the car's 95 RON requirement. However, with the introduction of E20 fuel, standard petrol now has a 95 RON rating, meaning the only distinction in XP95 now is its additive package. Are the these additives really helpful for TSI engines and is it worth spending extra money for XP95? Could you rank the top 3 petrol for VW TSI engines?

165

View Posts in Topic

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches