Autocar India
GT

Gavi Thind

14w

Hello, I am looking for a 7-seater diesel car that is low maintenance and reliable. I have shortlisted the Innova Crysta and the Mahindra Scorpio N. Is there any better option? Budget is ₹20-22 lakh.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
14w
The Toyota Innova Crysta would be an easy choice if the requirements are only for a reliable and low-maintenance seven-seater. It has a strong and trusty 2.4-litre diesel engine that can cover some serious kilometers without flinching. However, it does fall short of features and equipment, and the interior is more about function than form. The touchscreen and infotainment are old-school and downright dated, the buttons and plastics are hard and scratchy, and there aren't plush goodies like a sunroof, ventilated seats or wireless connectivity.
The Mahindra Scorpio N, on the other hand, has a more modern interior with the latest tech. The interior feels rich, and it is strong in performance and refinement, too. The downside is that the Scorpio is not comfortable for seven adults despite being a seven-seater. The third row is cramped, and with the three rows up, there isn't much space for luggage. The Crysta is a lot more practical.
Another option worth considering is the Kia Carens Clavis. It is a three-row MPV with good space across all rows. It also gets a refined diesel option, and Kia cars are reliable, too. The interior of the Clavis feels upmarket, and it is impressive when it comes to practicality.
A no-nonsense 7-seater with the bare minimum features would be the Crysta in its GX Plus variant. A fun-to-drive, hardy SUV would be the Scorpio-N, and a practical and feature-rich choice would be the Carens Clavis.
Kia Carens Clavis

Kia Carens Clavis

More questions on similar cars

SB

Sanjay B

3d

I am planning to upgrade from a Baleno (2019) and have been very happy with this car. I have a company lease policy wherein I can buy a car with ex-showroom price up to 18 lakhs. I'm looking to get a nice and safe 5 or 7 seater vehicle. I don't mind about fuel efficiency as fuel cost is covered by my company. However, I do need the panoramic sunroof and ventilated seats. I'm really confused with the options available, so can you please help me? My driving would be mostly within Hyderabad city with occasional highway trips maybe once in 3 months (~1200km). We are a family of 4 (2 boys aged 6 and 3 years) and once in a while, my parents / parents-in-laws come down which is why I am also considering a 7 seater.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

None of the 6 or 7-seater cars under Rs. 18 lakh ex-showroom, have both, panoramic sunroof and ventilated seats. If you're willing to sacrifice ventilated seats, you can get both, Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ O and Hyundai Alcazar Prestige DCT, both in their turbo-petrol DCT avatars, in your budget. However, since both these features are a must-have, you will have to settle for 5-seater instead. You could consider a Kia Seltos HTX Turbo-Petrol DCT (ex-showroom price is Rs 17.7 lakh), which gets the two features that you're looking for, along with a lot more modern niceties. The car is spacious, comfortable, and its cabin feels upmarket too. Also, opt for the turbo-petrol, as it will deliver effortless performance, especially during your occasional highway trips.

VehicleKia Carens Clavis
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHyundai Alcazar
TH

Thao

4d

I want to upgrade from my current car to an SUV, but I am confused between the Mahindra Scorpio N, Tata Harrier, and Mahindra XUV 7XO. During the rainy season, I occasionally have to drive on a slippery uphill stretch that my current Hyundai i10 is unable to handle. My budget is around Rs. 23 lakh. Which would be the most suitable choice for my requirements?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

For your requirement, the Mahindra Scorpio N would be our first recommendation. The key reason is that you have specifically mentioned a slippery hill climb during the rainy season. The Scorpio N's rear wheel drive architecture, higher ground clearance and more rugged SUV underpinnings give it an advantage in low grip situations compared to the Harrier and XUV 7XO. If your budget allows, even a 4WD variant would be worth considering.The XUV 7XO would be our second choice. As an overall product, it is the most modern of the three, with a better interior, more technology and a more premium feel. It is also more comfortable and easier to drive every day than the Scorpio N. However, if that slippery hill climb is a recurring part of your ownership experience, the Scorpio N's more rugged nature gives it the edge.The Tata Harrier is a good highway SUV with a comfortable ride, but for your specific requirement it would be our third choice. It is front wheel drive only and, apart from offering a more comfortable third row, the XUV 7XO is the stronger product in most other areas, including performance, technology, interior quality and overall ownership experience.

VehicleTata Harrier
VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleMahindra Scorpio N
AS

abhishek sharma

6d

I bought a Honda City V MT about two years ago and absolutely love the car. At the time, it was the perfect choice for my usage. However, my circumstances have changed significantly since then-I now have two large dogs (a Labrador and a German Shepherd), and the City is no longer practical for transporting both dogs comfortably, especially on longer highway trips. I am trying to decide between keeping the City and buying a second EV primarily for dog transport and city use, or replacing the City altogether with a single-car solution. The vehicles I am considering include the Kia Carens Clavis EV, Mahindra XEV 9S, Mahindra XEV 9e, BYD eMAX 7, and Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. My priorities are: Comfortable transport for two large dogs Highway touring ability Ease of parking and city usability Long-term ownership (8–10 years) Good ride comfort Reasonable running costs Would you recommend: 1. Keeping the Honda City and adding a practical EV (such as the Clavis EV), or 2. Moving to a single-car garage and choosing something like the XEV 9S, eMAX 7, or Hycross? Also, is there a midsize SUV (EV, hybrid, petrol or diesel) that offers: A low boot loading lip, Rear seats that fold nearly flat, Enough cargo length and width for two large dogs to comfortably lie down on highway trips, While still being manageable in city traffic and parking? Which vehicle would you choose for this specific use case and why?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

Pick a single-car solution and buy the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. Your dogs get a low loading lip and a long, near-flat space with the third row folded, so they can actually lie side by side on highway runs. The hybrid makes touring simple with no charging hassles, calm cruising and a comfy ride, and Toyota’s durability fits an 8-10 year plan with sensible running costs.EV MPVs like the Kia Carens Clavis EV and BYD eMax 7 are great for city runs and dog space, but long trips with two dogs mean 30-40 minute fast-charge halts and patchy chargers once you leave big corridors. That’s a hassle you do not need. Mahindra XEV 9S and 9e are good choices, but their higher boot floors make them poorer dog haulers.You will wrestle with the Innova's size in tight parking, and it costs more upfront than adding a small EV, but day to day, it is still easy enough with light steering and cameras.If you must go smaller, the Kia Carens Clavis turbo petrol DCT is a solid choice, but fuel efficiency in the city won't be as good as the Hycross hybrid.

VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
VehicleKia Carens Clavis EV
VehicleBYD eMax 7
VehicleMahindra XEV 9S
VehicleKia Carens Clavis

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

2d

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 24 Feb 2026