I want to buy a car between 13-14 lakhs, and my requirement is an automatic car for 60-70% city drive. I need good reliability as it’s gonna be used by the family too, and need a decent to good fuel economy car. But, I ain’t able to decide which car to go for, I need a suggestion (Except Tata, Mahindra and Maruti). Also tried Amaze 3g too, but the rear seats are not comfortable for the passengers.

Autocar India

•4h

Pick the Mahindra XUV 3XO EV for city use, as long as you have a fixed parking spot where you can install a home charger. In traffic, it is smoother and quieter than the petrol alternatives, costs far less per kilometre to run, and the range is easily enough for daily commutes with the AC on. One-pedal driving also makes stop-and-go traffic less tiring.The catch is charging. If you can’t install a home charger, then public charging will cost a lot more, and the savings will take much longer to add up. Also, if you often do long highway trips, an EV requires more planning, with stops revolving around charging stations. For pure city use, though, an electric car is much smoother and less tiring to drive than a petrol automatic.If charging feels like a hassle, then go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO AT over the Hyundai Venue DCT. The Mahindra’s automatic feels calmer at low speeds, and the car rides rough patches better, which matters in our cities. The Venue DCT is still nice to drive and compact to park, but in heavy traffic, the DCT can feel a bit hesitant.So, if home charging is sorted and your usage is mostly in the city, pick the XUV 3XO EV. If not, pick the XUV 3XO AT.

Mahindra XUV 3XO EV

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Hyundai Venue

Autocar India

•2d

As things stand today, both naturally aspirated and turbo petrol engines sold by major manufacturers are designed to be E20 compatible. There is no evidence to suggest that a modern turbo petrol engine will suddenly become unsuitable while an E20-compliant naturally aspirated engine remains unaffected. If India eventually moves to much higher blends, manufacturers will likely need to make hardware and calibration changes across the board, regardless of whether the engine is turbocharged or naturally aspirated.In fact, if you are choosing between a Venue Turbo DCT and an equivalent naturally aspirated rival, we would make the decision based on the way the car drives rather than on future fuel policy. The 1.0 turbo petrol offers better performance and flexibility than most naturally aspirated engines in the segment, especially on highways and during overtakes.So our advice would be simple: buy the Venue Turbo DCT if it suits your needs today. We do not see the turbocharged engine as carrying any meaningful additional risk from potential future ethanol-blend increases compared to a modern naturally aspirated petrol engine.

Hyundai Venue

Autocar India

•1d

The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT will be our pick on account. The steering is lighter, clutch and manual gearbox feel smoother, and its backseat too is a bit more spacious than the Skoda Kylaq. If you're usage is primarily within the city, the Venue will be slightly easier to live with. However, if you drive on highways more often, the Kylaq feels more planted and more confident than the Hyundai. Additionally, the Kylaq's boot is also a bit better shaped, hence you can pack in some more luggage, useful during long drives or airport runs.As far as price goes, the Venue HX5 will be relatively more affordable than the Kylaq Signature Plus, while packing in similar (if not more) equipment. Hence, it comes across as better value.Overall, if you want an easy-to-drive, value-for-money pick, get the Venue. But if you drive on the highways regularly, you will enjoy driving the Kylaq, so be prepared to pay the premium it commands.

Hyundai Venue

Skoda Kylaq