We presently own a 2014 Honda City Diesel as our secondary car and an Innova Crysta Diesel as our primary vehicle. Our usage is approximately 60% city and 40% highway. We are considering purchasing a new secondary car; however, upgrade options for sedan enthusiasts are quite limited. Kindly suggest suitable new car options within a budget of ₹20 lakhs.

Autocar India

•1d

With 60-80 km of daily driving, you are absolutely right that an EV would be the cheapest to run and very smooth in city traffic. However, since this is your primary car and you also take outstation trips, the need for charging planning and dependence on infrastructure can become inconvenient over time, especially on longer drives. It is usable, but not completely effortless yet.A strong hybrid fits your usage better. It gives you EV-like smoothness and excellent efficiency in city driving, while also delivering very good efficiency on highways, something modern hybrids now do surprisingly well. At the same time, you retain the full flexibility of a petrol car, eliminating any range anxiety or planning concerns. What’s even more impressive is that despite its size, it’s very easy to drive with great visibility, though its length can make parking in tight spots a bit challenging.We would have recommended you the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid instead, but considering you currently own the Honda City, the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder may not feel like a meaningful upgrade in terms of space. This is where the HyCross makes a stronger case. It offers a clear step up in space, comfort and long-distance usability, while still delivering the efficiency benefits of a hybrid.A petrol-only SUV in this budget will feel simpler to own, but with your running, fuel costs will be significantly higher, which reduces long-term value.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Honda City

Toyota Innova HyCross

Autocar India

•18m

With occasional highway trips, limited city use, and a cap of around ₹15 lakh, the Kia Carens Clavis HTE EX 1.5 NA manual fits your needs best. It is a true seven-seater that is easy to live with and stays within budget.Why it works for you: the petrol engine is smooth and quiet, and the light steering makes it simple to handle in the city. The middle row is roomy and comfortable, and roof vents help keep the cabin cool for everyone on hot days. Even the third row of this Kia car is surprisingly comfortable for adults.Know the trade-off: With all seven occupants on board and luggage, you will need to plan overtakes on the highway. Also, the boot space with all three rows up is just 216 litres, so for longer trips, you may need to fold the last row.If you don’t plan on using the third row often, then the Maruti Ertiga or Toyota Rumion are reliable picks. Maruti also has the largest dealer network if that is a concern for you.Overall, for your use and budget, the Carens Clavis lines up best.

Kia Carens Clavis

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

Toyota Rumion

Autocar India

•2h

Go for the Tata Altroz petrol manual. Within your budget and daily 70 km, it is the safest and most sensible pick. The Altroz has a 5-star crash test rating and a strong body, so it meets your “safe car” needs better than most in this price range. It feels steady at 70-90kph, the ride is comfortable on bad roads, and the seats support you well, which matters when you are in the car for a long time every day. It is also easy to drive in the city, and Tata’s service network is wide, so upkeep is simple in most towns.One thing to be aware of is that the petrol engine is fine for daily use, but it does not feel very quick if you push hard.If your city has a good CNG supply and you want lower running costs, look at the Tata Punch iCNG Adventure. It is also a very safe choice, offering a higher seating position that makes traffic and speed breakers easy, but it is not as relaxed as the Altroz on longer highway runs.

Tata Altroz

Autocar India

•4d

On paper and in real-world ownership, these are very different cars, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO sits in a clear segment above. The XUV 700 is a bigger, more complete SUV. It offers more space, better road presence, stronger performance and a far richer overall experience, including the option of a third row and a more premium cabin. It is designed as a proper family SUV and feels more capable on highways and long drives.The Renault Duster, even in its new form, is a simpler, more driver-focused and lighter SUV. It will likely be easier to drive in the city and feel more rugged and straightforward, but it is still a step down in terms of overall size, features and cabin experience.So the decision really comes down to intent. If you are moving because you want something more compact, easier to use daily and less feature-heavy, then the Duster can make sense. But if you are expecting it to feel like an upgrade or even equal to the XUV700 in terms of space, comfort and overall experience, it will not.

Renault Duster

Autocar India

•4d

The Tata Sierra is a big, heavy car, and the petrol engine, being a naturally aspirated unit, feels just about adequate, especially once you load it up or hit the highway. The diesel, on the other hand, suits the car far better with its stronger low-end pull, making overtakes easier and long-distance driving far more relaxed.That said, with your low annual running of under 6000 km, the petrol still makes sense if your usage is mostly in the city. It will feel smoother, easier to live with and perfectly adequate for everyday driving, even if it lacks that effortless punch on highways.If you are open to alternatives for a better petrol manual experience, the Renault Duster with its turbo petrol engine is a strong option. It feels far more effortless to drive, while naturally aspirated options like the Kia Seltos or Hyundai Creta offer a more refined and effortless experience than the Sierra petrol.

Tata Sierra

Renault Duster

Kia Seltos

Hyundai Creta

Autocar India

•3d

Between the three, the Skoda Kylaq is the best automatic for the money. It doesn’t use an AMT but a proper 6‑speed torque-converter with the 1.0 TSI, which is smooth, robust and easily the nicest for your occasional highway runs.The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo also gets the same 6‑speed torque-converter auto, and while it is refined and efficient, it doesn’t have the same solid, European feel or driving dynamics as the Kylaq. However, from an overall cost-of-ownership point of view - price, fuel efficiency and service, the Fronx is likely to work out cheaper.The Tata Nexon in your budget doesn’t get a torque-converter. You mainly have a 6‑speed AMT, which is convenient but nowhere near as smooth or quick as a proper automatic. There is also a 7‑speed DCA dual‑clutch option, which is noticeably better than the AMT, but still not as seamless as the autos in the Kylaq and Fronx, and it can push the price higher.For 11-13 lakh, 1,000km a month in the city and the odd long drive, we would pick the Kylaq auto. If budget discipline and running costs are top priority, go for the Fronx 1.0 turbo automatic.

Skoda Kylaq

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

Tata Nexon