Geely confirmed as sponsor of Bloodhound SSC project

    Geely to help Bloodhound SSC team finish delayed attempt to break land speed record in South Africa in 2017 and 2018.

    Published On Sep 28, 2016 06:00:00 PM

    2,177 Views

    Volvo’s parent company and China’s seventh largest carmaker, Geely, has been revealed as the new “prime sponsor and official automotive partner” of Britain’s Bloodhound SSC project. The project aims to set a new land speed record of over 1,000mph (1,600kph) on a specially prepared track in South Africa in 2017 and 2018.

    The deal, which was signed in August and runs for three years, is a godsend for Bristol-based Bloodhound. The project has been practically mothballed about nine months ago when its principals announced that previously laid testing plans were on hold — with the car about 85 percent built — because of a lack of finance. The actual size of Geely’s new financial contribution is not being disclosed, but it is understood to be worth millions. Bloodhound’s project director Richard Noble, who welcomes Geely as “a company with tremendous vision and capability that shares our passion for innovation and education” says the Bloodhound team will now be able to proceed with long-planned UK shakedown trials at Newquay airport in 2017, then proceed straight to its ready-prepared 11-mile track at Hakskeen Pan, South Africa, to try to reach 800mph (1,280kph).

    "We showed Bloodhound SSC at Canary Wharf earlier this year," said Noble. "For that, we did what is known as a dry build. About 90 percent of the components were in place but the car wasn't yet in a condition to run. It will take us about nine months to get to a running condition, then we'll go to Newquay airport next July, first to do tie-down tests and then to run the car up to 200mph/320kph. "After that we'll go straight to Hakskeen Pan in South Africa, hoping to be on site in September, with the aim of achieving 800mph before the rains come in December. We'll come straight back to the UK, because we'll have a lot of supersonic running data to compare with our research forecasts, and because we'll need to modify the back-end of the car quite a lot to take the three Nammo rocket motors that will get us to 1000mph."

    If that goes well, the team will return to South Africa in 2018 to fulfil its dream of exceeding 1,000mph/1,600kph. "Our relationship with Geely is terrific," added Noble. "They have the same kind of ambitions about innovation and science-based education as we do. I can't say exactly what funds they're contributing, but I can tell you Bloodhound now has 70 percent of its budget for 2016 to 2017 in place, which is amazing. In eight years, we've never been in that position before."

    Bloodhound is the brainchild of entrepreneur Richard Noble and fast jet pilot-cum-driver, Andy Green, who have held the land speed record in turn and locked out all other bidders since 1983. They are the only men ever to have “gone supersonic”, which they achieved in Thrust SSC at Black Rock, Nevada, in 1997, when Green set the current record of 763.035mph/1220.856kph "It's driving in a straight line, which can't be that hard," joked Green about his record attempt. "I sometimes think it's quite a bit easier than coping with London traffic. We're now in a state of preparedness where no land speed record effort has ever been before. We genuinely have technical solutions available to meet every problem. Green is going back to South Africa next month for the final inspection of the 12-mile track. "Three hundred people have worked for eight years, off and on, to get this place ready," he said. "They've picked up 16,000 tonnes of stones, mostly by hand. We're going to do some dummy runs in ordinary vehicles, with the FIA present, to make sure the helicopters and drones can do their work, and that our communications network works as well as we need it to."

    According to insiders, Geely’s financial contribution to the project is “far and away” the largest Bloodhound has ever had and comes with a strong desire from Geely to have a significant technical input in the land speed project, details of which are still being worked out. "[The Geely deal] happened via Peter Horbury – Volvo design boss – who brought Bloodshound to the notice of our chairman, Li Shufu, quite a while ago," explained Ash Sutcliffe. Geely's public relations boss. "The chairman took some time to learn about the project, but he came to see that Geely's objectives and Bloodhound's had a lot of similarities. We'll be integrating some electrical systems into the car, we'll do some work to make the cockpit more comfortable for Andy Green, and we'll build some chase vehicles, probably saloons, capable of at least 150mph/240kph. We'll be heavily involved."

    Geely will also help with the science and technology education side of the Bloodhound project, already highly successful across large parts of the globe, by bringing it to greater notice among schoolchildren in China, potentially a vast new audience." Though Geely faces challenges from ambitious rivals in its domestic car market, it is alone among Chinese domestic carmakers in having an impressive reputation for investing in European automotive companies and running them wisely. The company already owns Volvo and London Taxi, and has set ambitious new targets for both while guarding their brand values and heritage. “We are proud and excited to be part of this extraordinary Bloodhound team,” says Geely’s founder and chairman, Li Shufu. “We share their challenging spirit and passion for pushing technological barriers.”
     

    Copyright (c) Autocar Professional. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.86%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    31.58%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    30.24%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.31%

    Total Votes : 1349
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe