Gyalshing

•4h

I'm planning to replace Hyundai i10 with a petrol automatic car under 15 lakh that should be compact-sized due to limited parking space. The car should be suitable for long weekend drives, and comfortable for rear-seat occupants.

•1h

Coming from an i10, the Kia Syros would be a good step up without becoming difficult to manage in tight parking spaces. It remains relatively compact, but its tall, boxy cabin makes excellent use of the available space and the sliding, reclining rear seat is particularly useful for passengers. The 1.0-litre turbo petrol with the DCT also gives it the performance needed for comfortable weekend highway trips. The HTK+ DCT is priced at Rs 11.94 lakh ex-showroom, so it fits comfortably within your Rs. 15 lakh budget. The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo AT is another option if you want something smaller and easier to park.

Explore cars mentioned

Maruti Suzuki

Fronx

from ₹7.92 Lakh

Kia

Syros

from ₹9.73 Lakh

•5m•

You should consider Syros.

•53m•

Go with Syros, it is comapct and will be comfortable for rear seat passengers.

More posts on similar cars

•3d

I am a car enthusiast and love driving cars with great tech, music systems, and features. I currently drive a Honda Jazz Diesel V variant, which I have owned since October 2015. The car has clocked close to 1.5 lakh km. Due to restrictions in Delhi/NCR on diesel vehicles that are more than 10 years old, I have no choice but to sell the car, even though it is still in good condition, thanks to Honda’s bulletproof reliability. I am looking to replace it with a petrol car within a budget of Rs. 13-14 lakh on-road in UP. I have shortlisted the Hyundai i20 N Line N8 DCT. Is this a good choice, or are there any other equivalent options I should consider?

•2d

Given that you are a car enthusiast and are coming from a Jazz Diesel V, the i20 N Line N8 DCT is a very good fit. The 1.0-litre turbo petrol produces 120hp and 172Nm, and the N Line gets the sportier suspension, steering and styling that make it more engaging than the regular i20. It also gives you the technology and equipment you are looking for, including the 10.25-inch touchscreen, Bose audio system, wireless charging and a built-in dashcam.The main alternatives are the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT and Toyota Taisor or Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo AT. The Kylaq is the more practical choice, with SUV proportions, more ground clearance and a smoother six-speed torque converter automatic. It also has a 5-star Bharat NCAP rating. However, it does not have quite the same enthusiast appeal or feature-rich cabin as the N Line.The Taisor or the Fronx are also worth a test drive if you want a compact crossover with a punchy turbo engine and a conventional automatic, but the i20 N Line feels more special from behind the wheel.

Hyundai i20

Skoda Kylaq

Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

•7h

My budget is around Rs. 30 lakh for a chauffer driven car that will be used for approximately 140 km of daily commute (70 km from home to office and same for vice-versa) that translates to approximately 40,000 km annually. I will be using the rear seat and my priority is a convenient and safe journey without any tiredness because I travel daily. Please suggest me cars for the same.

•53m

With 140km of daily running and around 40,000km a year, this is exactly the sort of usage where the HyCross strong hybrid makes sense. Since you will be chauffeur driven and spend most of your time in the second row, its spacious cabin, excellent rear seat comfort, easy ride and strong air conditioning make it well suited to reducing fatigue on a daily commute.The Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T diesel automatic is another option worth considering within your budget. It has a comfortable ride, strong highway performance and useful active safety technology, but its second row does not offer the same chauffeur driven experience as the HyCross.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Mahindra XUV 7XO

•5h

I am 56 years old and am thinking of upgrading to an SUV. I currently own Maruti Suzuki Baleno that I had purchased in June 2016. The car is in good running condition and has completed 88,000 km till date. Should I upgrade my car now or wait for another 2 years to get a new vehicle? Should I dispose off the old one and go for new one now? Please suggest accordingly.

•1h

At 56, you are at a stage where comfort, ease of use and long-term reliability become more important than chasing the latest technology. Your Baleno has completed 88,000 km and is still running well, which suggests you are a careful owner and the car has plenty of life left. If it is mechanically sound and you are comfortable with it, there is no pressing need to upgrade purely for the sake of a new model. Cars today are not changing radically every two years, and waiting does not guarantee a significantly better product.The decision should be driven by your needs. If you are finding the Baleno low to get in and out of, or if you want a more comfortable ride and better visibility, then an SUV upgrade makes sense now. If you are happy with the car and it is not giving you any trouble, you can easily keep it for another couple of years.As for the upgrade, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza is a sensible choice. It offers a higher seating position, good ride comfort and Maruti's proven reliability and service reach. If you want something a bit more premium, the Kia Seltos is a good step up, but only if it fits comfortably within your budget.

Maruti Suzuki Baleno

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

Kia Seltos

View all Posts

Cars you may like

Hyundai Venue

₹8.00 - ₹15.65 Lakhs

Hyundai Aura

₹6.00 - ₹8.67 Lakhs

Hyundai Creta

₹10.91 - ₹20.14 Lakhs

Hyundai i20

₹6.00 - ₹11.64 Lakhs

Hyundai Verna

₹10.99 - ₹18.31 Lakhs

View all

Popular discussions right now

•6d

Hi, I’m confused between the Skoda Kylaq and Tata Punch EV and would like some advice on which one to buy. The car will primarily be used for city driving, with occasional highway trips. The budget is Rs 10-14 lakh on-road. I previously owned a Volkswagen Polo GT TDI, so I’m looking for a car that can offer a similar level of driving satisfaction while also being practical for everyday use. I’m currently confused between these two options and would appreciate some guidance.

•6d

Go for the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI. With your budget of Rs 10-14 lakh, mostly city usage and occasional highway runs, the Kylaq is the better fit. It offers a familiar driving experience coming from a Polo GT TDI, with a punchy turbo petrol engine, solid build quality and a sorted ride and handling balance. The Tata Punch EV is a good city car, but the Kylaq is more versatile for occasional highway trips and long-term ownership. The Kylaq also offers better rear seat space and a more premium feel overall. The Punch EV makes sense only if your usage is almost entirely city-based and you have reliable home charging. Given your budget and usage pattern, the Kylaq is the more balanced and sensible choice.

Skoda Kylaq

Tata Punch EV

•1w

I currently drive a Hyundai i10 CNG, with daily running of around 6 km in Gurgaon city traffic and a monthly highway drive of around 200 km. I am now planning to upgrade my car, with an on-road budget of Rs. 12 lakh for a petrol sub-4-metre SUV, up to Rs. 14 lakh for a petrol midsize SUV, and Rs. 15 lakh for an EV. I live in a rented apartment on the second floor, so I am apprehensive about getting an EV. I prefer an EV, but installing a charger could be complicated due to the sanctioned load. My running could increase to nearly 800 km per month in the future. My key priorities are: - Good suspension and ride comfort, as I have a back problem - Decent fuel efficiency in heavy city traffic - Low to medium maintenance costs - Auto hold and ventilated seats would be good to have I sometimes consider buying a manual, but I mostly prefer an automatic. I am currently considering the Maruti Brezza, Baleno AMT, Fronx AMT/AT, Sonet iMT, Exter AMT, and even the upcoming Inster, VF3, and Bayon. I am open to other suggestions as well. Note: I had a bad driving experience with the Punch AMT, as it caused back fatigue.

•6d

Given your priorities of ride comfort, fuel efficiency and low maintenance, the Maruti Brezza automatic is the most sensible upgrade. It offers a comfortable ride, a proven naturally aspirated petrol engine and Maruti's strong service network, which keeps long-term ownership costs in check. The torque converter automatic is smooth in city traffic, and the Brezza's higher seating position will help with your back issues. The Sonet iMT is not the right choice here. While it is a good car, the iMT is not a true automatic and will not offer the same ease of use in Gurgaon traffic. The Baleno AMT and Exter AMT are also not ideal given your back issues and the fact that AMT gearboxes are not as smooth as torque converter automatics in stop-start conditions.On the EV front, your apprehension about charging is valid. Without a straightforward home charging solution, an EV will add unnecessary complexity to your ownership experience. The upcoming Bayon is interesting and if you can wait a few weeks you would have a better picture before making a decision. For now, the Brezza automatic strikes the best balance between comfort, efficiency and hassle-free ownership.

Hi, I want to buy my last car as I am 66 years old. I have been driving a Honda City for the last 12 years without any major hiccup. The Honda City engine and its reliability is excellent although its ground clearance is an issue. I have looked at Elevate and given its ground clearance as an SUV, I am impressed although the issues on E20 and abrupt blending issues are surely technical issues. Windsor EV was a great test drive but all controls on screen could be a bottleneck for me at my age and am planning to move to an automatic. Please recommend as experts. My monthly running will not be more than 500 km. Should I also look at Seltos. I will appreciate a feedback from experts. I want a reliable, easy to drive car with low maintenance cost and good family value with. There won't be any great pick ups or many highway drives will not be there.

•4d

Given your 12 years of trouble free City ownership, the Elevate is the most natural replacement. It retains Honda’s simple 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine, adds substantially better ground clearance and gives you the easier ingress and SUV driving position you liked. The CVT is also very well suited to your low speed, low running usage and should make the transition to an automatic easy.On your E20 concern, we would not treat it as a reason to avoid the Elevate. Honda says all its cars manufactured in India since January 2009 are E20 material compatible, and the current Elevate is officially certified for E20. Honda also says E20 should not cause durability concerns or require any component changes. There can be a marginal reduction in fuel economy because ethanol contains less energy than petrol, but with your 500km monthly running, that is unlikely to be significant.The Seltos is worth a look, particularly if you want a more feature rich and premium cabin, but given your priorities of reliability, easy driving, low maintenance and long term ownership, the Elevate fits your requirements more naturally. The Windsor EV is also an interesting option, but at just 500km a month, there is little financial reason to move to an EV, especially when you have concerns about its touchscreen heavy interface.

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches