Autocar India
1w

I have a pre-owned 2020 Kia Seltos GTX+ AT 1.4 Turbo as my 2nd car. One issue I see with this is poor low-end torque, and I end up revving too hard when moving uphill in back-to-back traffic. The car has about 48K on the Odo. Any advice? I had it checked at Spinny (where I bought it), and they told me the DCT is ok. Can you confirm if the low-end torque on this engine/ model is a common issue?

Verified
18m

Yes, what you are experiencing is a known characteristic of the 1.4 turbo petrol DCT combination in the Seltos. Being a turbo-petrol engine, you need to rev the engine a bit for the turbos to spool, and that combined with a DCT that's tuned for efficiency rather than aggressive low-speed response, can make it feel a bit laggy at low revs. In stop-start traffic on inclines, the gearbox could feel slow to engage and hesitant. This is not a sign of a faulty gearbox, but rather a limitation of the DCT calibration in this application.The best way to manage this is to use the manual mode on the gearbox when you are in slow-moving traffic on an incline. By holding the car in a lower gear, you can keep the engine in its torque band and avoid the hesitation you are experiencing. You can also use the hill hold function and the brakes to control the car rather than relying on the throttle alone.If this is a major concern for you, the only real solution is to switch to a car with a torque converter or CVT gearbox, which are much smoother at low speeds. But if you are otherwise happy with the car, this is something you can manage with driving technique.

VehicleKia Seltos
Kia Seltos
Kia Seltos
16h

I currently drive a 2018 Polo GT TSI. Now, I am looking for a new primary car; the Polo will continue as a secondary city car. The purpose of the primary car is a more comfortable back seat for my elderly parents, and I will have a weekly, once- or twice-a-week intercity expressway commute of about 300 km a day. So, comfort on the highway is also very important. Should I go with an EV? If so, which one? Or should I opt for the Virtus GT, as I enjoy my Polo a lot, or consider any other sedan? Budget: Up to Rs. 30 lakh OTR in Karnataka.

Verified
1h

Given your requirements, the Volkswagen Virtus GT is the most sensible choice. You already enjoy your Polo GT TSI, and the Virtus GT builds on that formula with a more powerful 1.5 TSI engine, a larger and more comfortable cabin, and a genuinely enjoyable driving experience. It is one of the best driver's cars in the segment, and it is also well suited to long expressway runs.The back seat is a significant step up from the Polo, with good legroom and a comfortable seating position for your parents. The ride is on the firmer side, but it is well controlled at highway speeds, and the car feels stable and confidence-inspiring on long journeys.On the EV question, a 300km round trip once or twice a week is right on the edge of what most mainstream EVs can comfortably manage without charging stops in the real world. While cars like the Tata Harrier EV and XEV 9S can technically do it, you would be running the battery down to low levels, and charging infrastructure is still not consistent enough to make this a stress-free experience. The Virtus GT, on the other hand, is completely hassle-free on long highway runs.Overall, the Virtus GT strikes the best balance between driving enjoyment, rear seat comfort and long-distance usability. It is the car you are most likely to still enjoy owning after five years. If you can wait a few months, however, Volkswagen is launching a facelifted version that should get a few more features.

VehicleVolkswagen Virtus
VehicleTata Harrier EV
VehicleMahindra XEV 9S
15h

I am from Kerala and looking to buy a 7-seater car to replace my old Hyundai Eon. My options are the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga, XL6, and Kia Carens Clavis. The Clavis offers many options, including naturally aspirated and turbocharged petrol engines. Which car would be the most suitable for travelling with seven people? My maximum budget is Rs 16 lakh. Also, from a mileage point-of-view, which is better: turbo or naturally aspirated with a manual transmission?

Verified
1h

Go for the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga. It is the most sensible and reliable choice for your requirement. The Ertiga is a proven 7-seater with a comfortable third row, low running costs and Maruti's strong service network, which is important coming from a Hyundai Eon.The Maruti XL6 is essentially the same car with a more premium interior and captain seats in the middle row, but that reduces seating capacity to six, which does not suit your need for seven people.The Kia Carens Clavis is a good alternative with a more premium feel, but is positioned slightly higher, and on your budget of Rs 16 lakh, you will only get a low-spec model with fewer features. Between turbo and naturally aspirated petrol engines, the naturally aspirated engine is generally more fuel-efficient in real-world conditions, especially with a manual transmission.The Maruti Ertiga also fits comfortably within your Rs 16 lakh budget, letting you get the fully-loaded variant with more features. Overall, the Ertiga is the most practical and hassle-free 7-seater for family use.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Ertiga
VehicleMaruti Suzuki XL6
VehicleKia Carens Clavis
Maruti Suzuki Ertiga
Maruti Suzuki Ertiga
1d

I am interested in buying the 7XO, specifically the Petrol MT. But after seeing all kinds of reviews on the internet, I am really confused about which one to buy: petrol or diesel, AT or MT. My daily usage is mostly commuting to the office (20 km up and down). We will also be going on long trips (1,000-1,500+ km) twice or thrice a year. I also use the car for grocery shopping in the evening, so my monthly usage is around 300 km. The traffic here is full of bumper-to-bumper congestion. Please suggest which one I should buy: petrol or diesel, AT or MT, considering that I would like to keep this car for 8-10 years.

Verified
14h

Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO petrol automatic. Your usage is predominantly city commuting with heavy bumper-to-bumper traffic, and your monthly running is only around 300 km. In this scenario, a diesel simply does not make sense. Modern diesels make sense for long highway runs, and with your low running, the higher upfront cost and potential long-term maintenance costs aren't justified. The petrol engine is smooth, refined and well-suited to city driving, and the automatic gearbox will make your daily commute far less tiring. This Mahindra car is also a strong highway performer, so those occasional long trips will be handled with ease. The only downside is slightly higher fuel consumption compared to a diesel, but at your usage, that is not a major concern. The manual is worth considering only if you are very price-sensitive, but given your usage pattern, the automatic is the smarter choice for long-term comfort and convenience.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
Mahindra XUV 7XO
Mahindra XUV 7XO
1d

I am currently using my dad's Maruti Ritz and wish to upgrade to a more premium sedan or SUV. My current shortlist includes the Toyota Hyryder Strong Hybrid, Skoda Slavia, and Honda City e:HEV. Several thoughts and concerns keep coming to mind regarding each vehicle. The Hyryder is not a proper SUV, and its 3-cylinder engine has more vibration than 4-cylinder engines. The Slavia's 4-cylinder engine is giving single-digit fuel efficiency, especially with the E20 fuel concerns. I am also worried about the long-term maintenance of its turbo engine. The City e:HEV is priced above Rs. 20 lakh, attracting luxury tax, and its on-road price goes beyond Rs. 25 lakh. I am not sure whether the cost-benefit equation will work in favour of the City. The Slavia facelift is also around the corner. I wish to keep my next car for at least 10 years.

Verified
19h

Based on your requirements, the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Strong Hybrid is the most sensible upgrade. Your concerns about the 3-cylinder engine are understandable, but in the hybrid, the petrol engine is assisted by the electric motor, which smooths out the power delivery and reduces the typical 3-cylinder vibrations. This Toyota car also delivers excellent fuel efficiency, especially in city driving, which will make a significant difference over a 10-year ownership period. While it may not be a "proper" SUV in the traditional sense, it offers a higher seating position, good ground clearance and a comfortable ride, making it a practical and premium upgrade from the Ritz.The Honda City e: HEV is a strong alternative, but the higher price pushes it into a different budget bracket, and the cost-benefit equation becomes harder to justify. The Skoda Slavia is a great driver's car with a smooth 4-cylinder engine, an extremely practical cabin and strong performance, but if efficiency is a high priority, it is best to stick to the strong hybrid. The Slavia will receive an update soon, which will also feature a new gearbox which replaces the earlier Aisin-sourced 6-speed torque converter (AQ250) with a newer Aisin 8-speed torque converter (AQ300). This will be exclusive to the 1.0-litre engine and will be a bit more efficient too. However, in comparison to a strong hybrid, nothing really comes close. Overall, the Hyryder Strong Hybrid offers the best balance of efficiency, reliability and ownership experience for your needs.

VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder
VehicleHonda City
VehicleSkoda Slavia
Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder
Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder