Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

•16h

Hi Autocar team, I currently own a 2023 Tata Harrier and a 2011 Maruti Suzuki Alto. I use the Alto for my daily commute and the Harrier for long highway trips. I now want to replace the Alto with an EV for everyday use. I like the comfort and pricing of the MG Windsor Essence, but I am confused between the Windsor and the Tata Curvv EV. Which would you recommend?

•1h

Go for the MG Windsor Essence. It is a better fit for your requirements, particularly for daily commuting. The Windsor has a spacious cabin, a wide rear seat and a more premium feel. The Curvv EV is a good product, but its cabin does not offer the same level of space and comfort.

The Windsor also has a larger battery and a longer claimed range, giving you more flexibility for occasional longer drives. MG's EV ownership experience has also been positive, and the Windsor feels like a well-rounded product. Its main drawback is that MG's service network is not as extensive as Tata's, although this may be less of a concern if you primarily use it in the city.

Overall, the Windsor Essence is the more spacious and comfortable option for your daily commute.

Explore cars mentioned

Windsor

from ₹15.74 Lakh

Tata

Curvv EV

from ₹18.23 Lakh

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

More posts on similar cars

•3d

Hi, I am planning to buy an EV with an on-road price within ₹20 lakhs. Can I consider the ZS EV? My daily commute is around 50-60 km, including 30-35 km of highway driving, with the rest being city driving. I need a spacious car with a good interior. I don’t like the Curvv or Windsor designs. I currently use a Nexon petrol, which I like.

•2d

The MG ZS EV is a strong fit for your requirements if it is the discounted car under Rs 20 lakh on road. Your daily 50 to 60km commute, including 30 to 35km on the highway, is well suited to an electric car, and this MG car offers a more premium cabin and a roomier feel than your current Tata Nexon petrol. Since you dislike the Tata Curvv and MG Windsor designs, there's little reason to force yourself towards either.The current ZS EV has a 50.3kWh battery and a real world range of around 340km. Its comfortable ride and conventional SUV styling make it a sensible upgrade, while the main drawback is that it is an ageing model, with a replacement reportedly expected around 2027.That could affect resale value, but the discount can help offset the risk.

I have a budget of around Rs 14-15 lakh and am considering the Kia Syros EV with a 42kWh battery and the Tata Nexon EV Creative with a 45kWh battery. Which is the better choice? I am particularly concerned about the NMC battery chemistry in the Syros EV.

•32m

The Kia Syros EV 42kWh is the one to go for. It's significantly more spacious than the Tata Nexon EV, and overall quality and reliability are a clear step above the Nexon's. In our experience, Hyundai and Kia's electric cars are also the most efficient, so you'll manage a crucial bit more range on the Syros too. The NMC battery pack should not be a deal breaker by any means. While LFP is theoretically better suited to hotter climates as we have in India, real-world performance does not suggest one chemistry is better than the other. Car makers develop vehicles with a full life cycle in mind, and the long warranties on EV batteries should allay any fears you may have.

Kia Syros EV

Tata Nexon EV

•1d

Hi Autocar Team, I am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT and the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 TCMPFi. I am getting a good offer on the Venue. We have owned a Hyundai Grand i10 Nios for the last seven years without any issues. I like the XUV 3XO for its engine and the additional features it offers over the Venue. However, I also like the Venue because I am familiar with its driving experience and refinement. I plan to keep the new car for at least seven years, so I am looking for trouble-free ownership and a good service centre experience. My spouse prefers the rear-seat comfort of the 3XO, especially its under-thigh support and legroom, but dislikes its boot space. We also expect our family to grow in the coming years, so practicality is important. In terms of performance, I am not expecting a race car at this budget. I want a car with decent power that does not feel sluggish or make highway overtaking difficult. It should also offer reasonable mileage in city traffic and a comfortable ride for both front and rear passengers on city roads and highways. My usage will be around 60% city driving, along with a long drive of approximately 500 km every month. We have already considered other cars, and these two are our final choices. Could you please compare them in terms of ownership costs, maintenance, performance, comfort and reliability? It would also help if you could highlight any notable issues I might face with either car that could affect the driving experience or passenger comfort.

•16h

It seems like you're leaning towards the Mahindra XUV 3XO for its stronger engine performance, better feature set, and a nicer back seat experience. It is a genuinely well-rounded car, and its ride comfort and drive experience make it feel like a much larger, more expensive car. Also, between the two, the XUV 3XO is the much better car for the highway. As you've rightly pointed out, its boot space is lower on paper; however, the actual usable space is quite similar to the Venue's. So, if you like the XUV 3XO, go for it; it is a good buy.The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT might seem a bit more user-friendly with lighter controls, which make it easier to drive in the city. Moreover, you already have a positive ownership experience with Hyundai, and the Venue continues that formula with a refined turbo petrol engine and a well-built, more modern interior. It has enough performance for confident overtakes on the highway and remains reasonably efficient in city traffic. Between the two, though, the XUV 3XO gives you a big car feel, while the Venue is easier to drive in the city. For similar money, we'd pick the XUV 3XO; however, if you're getting the Venue at a substantially lower discounted price, it is a car you can't go wrong with.

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Hyundai Venue

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Compare suggested cars

Windsor

from ₹15.74 lakhs

Tata

Curvv Ev

from ₹18.23 lakhs

Compare Now

Windsor

from ₹15.74 lakhs

Tata

Nexon Ev

from ₹13.25 lakhs

Compare Now

Windsor

from ₹15.74 lakhs

Mahindra

Xuv400

from ₹16.43 lakhs

Compare Now

Tata

Curvv Ev

from ₹18.23 lakhs

Mahindra

Xuv400

from ₹16.43 lakhs

Compare Now

Tata

Curvv Ev

from ₹18.23 lakhs

Zs Ev

from ₹19.08 lakhs

Compare Now

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•2d

Please advise which car would be the best choice for long-term ownership: the Mahindra Scorpio, Tata Safari, Tata Harrier, Jeep Compass, Volkswagen SUV, or any other suitable option. My priority is reliability, long-term durability, and hassle-free ownership over the next 10 years or more. I would appreciate suggestions based on real-world ownership experience, maintenance costs, spare parts availability, and after-sales support.

•1d

For long-term ownership, the Mahindra Scorpio N is the safest recommendation from your shortlist. It has a proven track record, robust mechanicals and a strong service network, making it a dependable choice for 5-10 years of ownership. The Tata Harrier and Tata Safari have improved significantly, but the Scorpio N still has the edge on long-term reliability and ownership confidence. The Jeep Compass is a good product, but it is now an ageing model and does not offer the same value proposition as the Scorpio N. If you are open to alternatives, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is worth considering. It is a more modern product with a better balance of comfort, features and refinement, and it is a strong long-term ownership proposition as well. The Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are excellent driver's cars, but they are smaller and do not offer the same level of space or road presence as the Scorpio N or XUV 7XO.

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a seven-seater car. I have test-driven the Renault Triber Turbo and Citroen Aircross X and was impressed by what both offer at their price points. However, the Aircross put a wide smile on my face. As a current Maruti Suzuki user, I did not consider the Ertiga because it feels similar to our Swift. I liked the Aircross X but am sceptical about Citroen's service network and spare parts availability. However, there are three Citroen showrooms within 45 km of my place. Please suggest which car I should choose. My budget: Rs. 15 lakh Current vehicle: Second-generation Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol (2017) Annual usage: Around 10,000 km, with a 50:30:20 split between town, highway and city driving Requirement: A seven-seater car

•4d

The Citroen's interiors feel more special, its engine is more powerful, and its ride-handling balance is outstanding; however, for seven adults, it won't be as comfortable as the Triber.In fact, the Triber's superb packaging makes it genuinely comfortable for passengers in all three rows, despite its compact sub-4-meter dimensions. The new turbo-petrol engine makes it an effortless performer, and its ride quality feels very mature too. Moreover, the Triber Turbo is also much more affordable in comparison, making it outstanding value for money. Yes, the Aircross X will appeal to your heart, but given Citroen's limited service network and cramped third row, the Triber Turbo is the more sensible choice.

Renault Triber

Citroen Aircross

•1d

I am planning to buy my first car. I want to have a 7-seater and need it for long term ownership. I liked the Citroen Aircross X design for 5+2. I am planning to choose a car with automatic transmission. I have couple of major concerns for which I would like your advice. First one is Mileage, I heard Aircross has a mileage issue and its real-world city mileage is 8 kpl while on highway it is 14 kpl. Is it the same for X version also? Second advice is for its service network. I have heard from the people that its service is slow. Regular servicing also takes around 2 days of time. I have a service center within 10 km from my home. My budget is Rs. 20 Lakh and I need an automatic transmission with rear and front parking camera or 360-degree camera since I am a new driver. Are there any 7-seater alternatives within this budget?

•1d

The Citroen Aircross X is a good-looking car, now with a premium interior. It is the only SUV in its category which offers a 5+2 seating configuration, and even though the third row is not particularly spacious, it works for occasional use. The real-world fuel efficiency figures as per our tests are 9.5kpl and 13.62kpl in city and highway conditions, respectively, which is quite decent given the strong and smooth performance this 1.2-turbo-petrol-AT delivers. What's more is that ride comfort is outstanding, perhaps the best among all midsize SUVs. So as far as comfort and practicality goes, the Aircross X is a good car.Citroen's service centre network is limited, but since you have a touchpoint close to your home, your vehicle's regular servicing and maintenance is likely to be taken care of smoothly. If you love the Aircross X for what it is, go for it - as far as value goes, it is an outstanding proposition. If you're looking for proper seven-seater alternatives, we'd strongly recommend the Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ turbo-petrol automatic version. All three rows are properly spacious, well-suited for adults. This variant will be within your Rs 20 lakh on-road budget, and it has front and rear parking sensors, as well as rear-view camera to make parking easy for you. Sure, it isn't an SUV, but it is a very sensible car, if you need a proper seven-seater.

Citroen Aircross

Kia Carens Clavis

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches