Autocar India
MA

Mahes

13w

I used to ride a old santro zip drive, and now I'm gona buy a new car with auto loan. I like new victoris vxi but cost is 14.5L whereas I got only 12L approval. Comparatively I saw brezza zxi in 13L budget however It was not having a modern look as victoris. My confusion is, is it good idea to spend additional money on what we like or to go with need and requirement although if not liking much ?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
13w

The Maruti Suzuki Victoris is not only newer but being larger too, has the more upmarket image versus a Brezza. However, if that is not a concern you will actually find great value in opting for the Brezza. 

For one, it uses the same 1.5-litre petrol engine as the Victoris. Secondly, the well packaged Brezza offers similar cabin space to the larger Victoris. The Brezza ZXI is also reasonably well specced packing in features like a sunroof and LED headlights that you don't get on a Victoris VXI. 

The Brezza is due for an update soon. The facelift could address your concern about styling. Our advice would be to wait a couple of weeks for the Brezza facelift

Maruti Suzuki Victoris

Maruti Suzuki Victoris

AS

Ashish

13w

I am owner of Nexon, and planning to change my car. I am looking for some guidance on the car which had automatic parking feature. Because the parking space which I have is quite tight, however the space is sufficient enough to park a car as wide as Innova crysta, if doors need not be opened. Which cars have automatic parking feature in India? Please guide., my budget is 20 lakhs for such cars

More questions on similar cars

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 7 Mar 2026