F1: Court dismisses Sauber's van der Garde appeal

    The decision leaves the team with three drivers for this weekend's Australian Grand Prix.

    Published On Mar 12, 2015 04:02:00 PM

    1,583 Views

    F1: Court dismisses Sauber's van der Garde appeal

    The Sauber Formula 1 team's appeal against a court verdict that Giedo van der Garde should race for it in the Australian Grand Prix has been dismissed.

    Former Sauber reserve van der Garde launched legal proceedings against Sauber after he claimed that the team went back on a race deal that had been agreed for 2015.

    This claim was upheld in the Australian courts on Wednesday, but Sauber immediately appealed the verdict.

    However, following the appeal, the Supreme Court of Victoria dismissed Sauber's case, backing up the previous verdict.

    A statement read out in court on Thursday said: "We did not consider this course [the appeal] to be in the interest of justice.

    "The appeal is dismissed because we see no error in the reasons of the trial judge."

    Part of Sauber's case was based around the safety risks of a using driver unfamiliar with its 2015 car. This was also rejected by the court.

    "As the judge observed, these events are highly-regulated and we are sure that all safety requirements will be complied with," the statement added.

    The decision means that Sauber effectively has three drivers - van der Garde, plus its 2015 line-up of Marcus Ericsson and Felipe Nasr - for only two cars this weekend.

    Copyright (c) Autosport. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.67%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.49%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.93%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.91%

    Total Votes : 1068
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe