Autocar India
AV

Avinash

21w

I currently own an Ertiga Diesel VDI and am planning to change my car. I want a 7-seater vehicle with an automatic transmission and would like suggestions on suitable options.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
21w

The most logical option for you would be to upgrade to the current Ertiga, which is a generation ahead of the one you currently have.

The current Maruti Suzuki Ertiga is more spacious than your model and comes with a smooth 6-speed automatic too. 

However, there is no diesel option available like in the previous generation Ertiga that you own. So if you are looking for an MPV with the low running cost of diesel, the next best option, if you have the budget, is the Kia Carens Clavis diesel. It comes with a 1.5 diesel automatic, coupled to a smooth-shifting six-speed auto transmission.

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

More questions on similar cars

VE

Venkat

4w

Looking for a 7-seater with good third-row space, although most of the time the third row will remain folded and be used for my labrador and, occasionally, luggage. I need a car that must have good space across all three rows, front and rear parking sensors, 360-degree camera, at least low double-digit fuel efficiency and it should not feel underpowered with a full load. My usage will be occassionally highway drives of 300-500 km trips, along with moderate city usage of a maximum of 400 km per month. My current car has covered 35,000 km in 2.5 years, most of which are highway runs. I am considering Kia Clavis HTK+ as it is feature-loaded and comfortable, but the Petrol Turbo AT is quite thirsty, and I have concerns about the DCT in bumper-to-bumper traffic, along with safety concerns. Another car that I am considering is Tata Safari Petrol AT but there are customer complaints regarding quality issues and the new engine. I have also shortlisted XUV7X0 as it is powerful and good to drive, but the third row feels impractical and the fuel efficiency is quite poor. Now I am considering trying the Toyota Hycross non-hybrid as well. Please let me know your thoughts.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Your use is mostly long highway runs with the third row folded for your Labrador, plus a clear need for space in all three rows, parking aids and a 360 camera, and you don’t want it to feel weak when fully loaded. In that situation, the Toyota Innova Hycross 2.0 petrol automatic (non-hybrid) 8-seater is the one from your list that fits best overall. Its third row is the roomiest here, and when you fold it, you get a long, flat floor that is easy for a big dog and luggage. The CVT automatic, makes city work easy, but on the highway it has to work a bit hard to build up speed. Keep speeds steady, and you should see double-digit fuel efficiency on the highway, which matches your requirement.A couple of watch‑outs. The non‑hybrid Hycross does not get a factory 360 camera, and front sensors are limited to higher trims, so you may need a dealer‑fit 360 setup to meet that must‑have. Also, performance with a full load is just about adequate but not as strong as big‑turbo rivals if you push hard.If you must have a factory 360 camera, from your list, the Kia Clavis in a higher trim with the 1.5 turbo DCT gives you that and has a usable third row. Although your concern on DCT in heavy traffic is fair. Given your light city use, that risk is low. If you’re open to diesel, the Safari diesel AT also ticks power, highway comfort and 360 camera, but its third row is not as roomy as the Hycross. Overall, for your highway‑led use and dog‑friendly space, the Hycross non‑hybrid lines up best if you’re okay with adding a 360-camera via the dealer.

VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
VehicleTata Safari
VehicleKia Carens Clavis
KU

Kumar

12h

I am looking to buy a new car. My yearly running is around 10,000-12,000 km. My priorities are high safety, comfortable driving with senior citizens and kids, and ease of driving for a 5-foot-tall driver. I plan to keep the car for the next 8-10 years. I live in a tier-3 city with no dedicated parking and do a fair amount of hill driving (20-25%). My usage is around 30% city and 70% highway driving.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
7h

Given your 70% highway use, frequent hill drives, comfort and safety needs, and street parking in a tier-3 town, the Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol manual is the strongest fit for the next 8-10 years. It feels solid and safe and has a 5-star crash safety rating, stays steady at highway speeds, and its higher seat makes it easy for seniors to get in and out. The driver seat is height adjustable so you get a clear view out, so you won't have any trouble given your 5ft height. On climbs and descents the manual gives you good control, the engine pulls well from low speeds, and the ride stays comfy even over rough surfaces. The substantial ground clearance also helps on rough village roads and to clear tall speed breakers, and Mahindra’s service reach is fairly wide outside big cities.Do note though, the XUV 3XO has a small boot in comparison to rivals, so highway trips with your family will require some planning. If you want an easier ownership experience, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza manual is a fine alternative. It’s very easy to see out and park, rides comfortably, and service support is everywhere, though its engine isn't as punchy and it's not as feature-rich.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO

Popular discussions right now

VA

Vasu

1w

I own a Honda City 4th Generation and have been getting an average fuel efficiency of 16.1 km/l over 85,000 km. Would it be worth installing a CNG kit to improve the mileage further? Please suggest.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

With the kind of mileage you are already seeing from your 4th generation Honda City, I would not rush to fit a CNG kit. Around 16 kpl over 85,000 km is actually a healthy real world figure for a petrol sedan, and since the City is known for its smoothness and refinement, adding an aftermarket CNG kit will inevitably change the character of the car. Honda does not offer a factory CNG option for the City, so any retrofit will be third party, which means compromises in boot space, some loss in outright performance and the added variable of installation quality and long term reliability. Honda also recommends using fuel that meets the vehicle specifications, and aftermarket modifications can complicate warranty or support considerations on newer cars.A CNG conversion only starts making strong financial sense if your running is very high and you plan to keep the car for several more years to recover the kit cost. If your annual usage is moderate, the payback period can be longer than expected. The only real case for going CNG here is if fuel cost reduction is your absolute top priority. Otherwise, given how well your City is already performing, I would leave it as is and enjoy the refinement rather than fixing something that is not really broken.

VehicleHonda City

Posted on: 15 Dec 2025