Autocar India
6h

I have an elite i20 2018 model my stock size is 195/55 r16 but I want to install 195/60 r16 because that's the tyre comes in Geolandar XCV newly launched by Yokohama. I am confident enough that these upsize will not hamper but I want to know that installing these tyres will it be good? As my i20 is lightweight compared to SUV and these tyres are mostly made for SUV and heavy vehicle so am I putting an extra load by adding these heavy tyres, will it damage my enitre dynamics drastically? I want a superior braking, and a good comfort road noise minimisation could be average but should not be too soft that it gets easily punctured or cracks in sidewall while hitting a potholes. heard many reviews of UC 6 getting punctures and cracks in sidewalls due to potholes. Turanza 6i is also an alternative but comes with the same problem too much soft compound and I drive like idgaf in potholes without any stress. Another good option is blue earth gt max shall I consider it but heard that wet grip is not that great and doesn't feel good in steering. As the geolandar xcv launched newly in India so I was kinda leaned towards its preference but as it is made for only Suv and crossover am kinda in doubt what should I do. Please suggest something worth invsting my money for.

Verified
3m

The Geolandar XCV is a good tyre, but it is designed for SUVs and crossovers, and your Hyundai i20 is a much lighter car. The tyre will be heavier than your stock tyre, and that will add unsprung weight, which will affect ride quality and handling. The sidewall will also be stiffer than a typical hatchback tyre, which could make the ride harsher on a light car like the i20. The upsize from 195/55 R16 to 195/60 R16 is not huge, but it will increase the overall diameter by about 3.5%, which will slightly affect speedometer accuracy and gearing.If your priority is durability and resistance to sidewall damage, the Geolandar XCV will do the job, but it is overkill for an i20.

VehicleHyundai i20
Hyundai i20
Hyundai i20
7h

I am planning to buy a sub-4m SUV and have shortlisted the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus Automatic and Hyundai Venue HX5 Diesel Automatic. My annual running is expected to be around 16,000 to 18,000 km, including approximately 12,000 km of highway driving. From an economic point of view, I am slightly concerned about the Kylaq’s real-world petrol mileage, especially given the high amount of highway running. I am also concerned about the long-term implications of E20 petrol and whether it could lead to any issues in the future. On the other hand, I have concerns about buying a diesel due to the possibility of future government restrictions and the uncertainty around long-term diesel ownership. Considering these factors, I would appreciate your advice on which of the two would be the better choice for at least eight years of ownership.

Verified
2h

Go for the Hyundai Venue Diesel Automatic. With your annual running of 16,000-18,000 km and a strong highway component, the diesel makes clear financial sense. The Venue’s diesel is refined and well suited to long-distance driving, and the 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and reliable. Hyundai’s service network and ownership experience are also strong, which matters over an 8-year horizon.The Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus Automatic is the better driver’s car, but the 1.0 TSI petrol will not match the diesel’s efficiency at your running, and the E20 concern is largely overstated – modern engines are engineered for it, and there is no official roadmap beyond E20. On the diesel side, the government has not announced any blanket restrictions on private diesel cars, and with Bharat Stage 6 and DPF technology in place, long-term ownership is not a major concern.The Venue is the more sensible and cost-effective choice for your usage pattern. If you want a more premium and spacious diesel SUV, the Kia Seltos Diesel Automatic is worth stretching for, but within your shortlist, the Venue is the right call.

VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleSkoda Kylaq
11h

I’m planning to buy a sub-compact SUV with a budget of around Rs 12 lakh. I prefer a manual transmission and am looking for a car that offers a smooth and comfortable driving experience in both the city and on highways. I also travel to hill areas about twice a year, so I’m unsure whether a turbocharged or naturally aspirated (NA) engine would be better suited to my requirements. The two cars I’m currently considering are the Maruti Suzuki Brezza with its 1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine and the Hyundai Venue with its 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine. I’d like to understand which engine would be better suited to my usage, how the two compare in city traffic, highway driving and hill roads, and which would offer better long-term reliability and ease of maintenance. I’d also like to know the expected difference in real-world mileage between the two and, considering my overall requirements and budget, which of the two would be the better choice.

Verified
3h

Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.5L naturally aspirated petrol. It is the better fit for your requirements. The 1.5L NA engine is smooth, refined and delivers linear power, which makes it easy to drive in the city, comfortable on highways and predictable on hill roads. It has enough torque to handle inclines without feeling strained, and you do not have to worry about turbo lag or the need to downshift aggressively on steep sections.The Hyundai Venue 1.0L turbo is a punchy engine and feels more energetic when pushed, but it does have some turbo lag at low speeds and requires more gear changes on hills. It is also a smaller three-cylinder engine, so it is not as refined as the Brezza’s four-cylinder unit. In terms of reliability and maintenance, Maruti has the edge with a simpler naturally aspirated engine and a wider service network.Real-world mileage will depend on driving style, but the Brezza should deliver slightly better consistency, especially on highways and hills, while the Venue turbo can be more efficient if driven gently in the city. Overall, the Brezza is the more dependable and easier-to-live-with choice for your usage pattern.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleHyundai Venue
8h

Hello Team, I currently own a 2013 Hyundai i20 Sportz CRDi and am planning to upgrade to a mid-size SUV. My budget is around Rs 20 lakh on-road in Kerala. My monthly running is approximately 700-800km, with occasional long drives, and I plan to keep the car for at least 10 years. I recently test drove the Duster 1.3-litre DCT automatic and was quite impressed with its driving dynamics and comfort. I really enjoyed the overall driving experience. Could you please share your insights on whether the Duster would be a good choice for long-term ownership, considering my usage and the fact that I plan to keep the car for 10 years? Also, are there any other alternatives in this budget that I should consider?

Verified
5h

The Renault Duster actually sounds like a very good fit for your requirements. With just 700–800km of monthly running and occasional long drives, there is little reason to choose a diesel, and the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol gives you plenty of performance for both city use and highway trips. The Duster’s biggest strengths are its excellent balance of ride comfort and driving dynamics, along with 212mm of ground clearance.The 1.3 DCT is also a particularly good combination. It uses a wet-clutch DCT, and the gearbox is smooth enough in everyday driving while the engine provides strong performance when you are out on the highway.The only reservation is long-term ownership. This is a new-generation Duster, so there simply isn't enough 8 to 10 year Indian ownership data yet. The DCT is also mechanically more complex than a conventional torque converter, and Renault's service reach isn't as strong as Hyundai, Kia or Maruti.If you want alternatives, the Kia Seltos 1.5 IVT is the more conservative long-term choice, while the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 AT is worth considering if driving enjoyment is important.

VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleSkoda Kushaq
Renault Duster
Renault Duster
1d

I am planning to buy a new crossover within a month and want to keep it for four to five years. My priorities are good resale value, decent highway acceleration and mileage. My budget is Rs 15-17.5 lakh, and I am considering only cars with a DCT, torque-converter, CVT or IVT automatic. I have shortlisted the Skoda Kushaq Signature, Hyundai Creta S(O), Kia Seltos HTK and Honda Elevate VX. I am also considering waiting for the new Elevate facelift in October. I was thinking of waiting for the Creta facelift as well, but it will take a few more months. I expect to drive 60% in the city, with occasional highway trips. I want a car that performs well on the highway, offers good overtaking ability and delivers decent mileage. I have driven Honda and Volkswagen sedans abroad. Which car would be the better fit for my needs?

Verified
21h

Based on your requirements, the Skoda Kushaq Signature 1.0 TSI with the 8-speed torque converter automatic is the best fit. It offers strong mid-range performance for highway overtakes, a proven and reliable powertrain, and a driving experience that will feel familiar and engaging given your experience with VW group cars abroad. The torque converter automatic is smooth and well-suited to your 60% city usage, while still delivering the punch you want on the highway. This Skoda car also sits comfortably within your budget and is available immediately, which is important given your one-month timeline.The Hyundai Creta S(O) IVT and Kia Seltos HTK IVT are both excellent alternatives if you prioritise refinement and a more premium cabin experience. The IVT gearbox is exceptionally smooth in the city, but the naturally aspirated petrol engine does not offer the same mid-range punch as the Kushaq for highway overtakes. The Honda Elevate VX CVT is the most reliable long-term ownership proposition, but again, the naturally aspirated engine is not as strong on the highway.Waiting for the Elevate facelift in October is a reasonable option if you are not in a hurry, but the changes are expected to be incremental rather than transformative.Overall, the Kushaq Signature 1.0 TSI torque converter strikes the best balance between performance, reliability, driving enjoyment and immediate availability. It will deliver the highway performance you want while remaining easy to live with in the city.

VehicleSkoda Kushaq
VehicleHyundai Creta
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHonda Elevate
Skoda Kushaq
Skoda Kushaq
1w

Hi team, I booked a Tata Punch Empowered+ EV in late June in Goa and was initially told that I might get it by September. However, the dealer now says that due to high demand, the delivery could be delayed until November - December. Since I made the booking, the Punch EV’s price is now quite close to that of the base Kia Syros EV. Concerns around after-sales service and the delivery delay are also making me a bit hesitant. I was therefore considering the Kia Syros EV HTK, the base variant. Is there any way to get a 360-degree camera fitted without voiding the warranty? Alternatively, can I install a dashcam that provides at least front and rear feeds on the car’s main screen, again without affecting the warranty? If this is feasible, I feel the Syros EV base variant could be a compelling option. Could you please suggest whether I should make the switch or stick with my existing Punch EV booking?

Verified
1d

Given the delay and price increase on the Tata Punch Empowered+ EV, the Kia Syros EV HTK is now a very compelling alternative. It is a larger, more premium car with a more spacious cabin and a better overall ownership experience. This Tata car is still a good product, but the Syros EV is simply a more complete car for a similar price.On the 360-degree camera, the answer is unfortunately no. The Syros EV HTK does not come with the necessary hardware (multiple cameras, control module, integration with the car's electronics) to support a factory-style 360-degree system. Aftermarket kits are available, but they require significant wiring and integration work, and Kia will not support them under warranty.A dashcam is a better solution. You can fit a high-quality front and rear dashcam system without voiding the car's warranty, as long as the installation is done cleanly and does not involve cutting or splicing into the car's wiring harness. However, the feed will not display on the main infotainment screen. It will record to its own memory card and can be viewed on a phone app or a small screen on the dashcam itself.

VehicleTata Punch EV
VehicleKia Syros EV