Mumbai

Pawan singh

•4h

I am planning to buy the VinFast VF MPV 7 for my daily commute of around 100 km in Mumbai. Considering the buyback offers being provided by the company, do you think it is a good option?

Autocar India

•4m

The Vinfast VF MPV 7 is a fundamentally sorted car, that is spacious, and is fitted with a large battery which promises a healthy real-world range.

Do read the buyback fine print carefully. Check the guaranteed value and tenure, the yearly kilometer limit, battery health requirement, full service history rules, any finance tie-in, damage exclusions, and whether the offer transfers if you move cities. If you are within those boxes, the offer is useful.

The Kia Carens Clavis is an excellent alternative, which has a more inviting interior with excellent fit-finish and quality, and despite being smaller in dimensions, it is surprisingly spacious and comfortable. Also, while the Clavis has a smaller battery, it is very efficient, hence you can expect over 350km on a single charge. Moreover, the Clavis will be cheaper to buy, making it much better value than the VF MPV 7.

Explore cars mentioned

Vinfast

VF MPV 7

from ₹25.99 Lakh

Kia

Carens Clavis

from ₹13.29 Lakh

Cars you may like

Vinfast VF MPV 7

₹24.49 Lakhs

View all

More questions on similar cars

Sanjay B

•4d

I am planning to upgrade from a Baleno (2019) and have been very happy with this car. I have a company lease policy wherein I can buy a car with ex-showroom price up to 18 lakhs. I'm looking to get a nice and safe 5 or 7 seater vehicle. I don't mind about fuel efficiency as fuel cost is covered by my company. However, I do need the panoramic sunroof and ventilated seats. I'm really confused with the options available, so can you please help me? My driving would be mostly within Hyderabad city with occasional highway trips maybe once in 3 months (~1200km). We are a family of 4 (2 boys aged 6 and 3 years) and once in a while, my parents / parents-in-laws come down which is why I am also considering a 7 seater.

Autocar India

•1d

None of the 6 or 7-seater cars under Rs. 18 lakh ex-showroom, have both, panoramic sunroof and ventilated seats. If you're willing to sacrifice ventilated seats, you can get both, Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ O and Hyundai Alcazar Prestige DCT, both in their turbo-petrol DCT avatars, in your budget. However, since both these features are a must-have, you will have to settle for 5-seater instead. You could consider a Kia Seltos HTX Turbo-Petrol DCT (ex-showroom price is Rs 17.7 lakh), which gets the two features that you're looking for, along with a lot more modern niceties. The car is spacious, comfortable, and its cabin feels upmarket too. Also, opt for the turbo-petrol, as it will deliver effortless performance, especially during your occasional highway trips.

abhishek sharma

I bought a Honda City V MT about two years ago and absolutely love the car. At the time, it was the perfect choice for my usage. However, my circumstances have changed significantly since then-I now have two large dogs (a Labrador and a German Shepherd), and the City is no longer practical for transporting both dogs comfortably, especially on longer highway trips. I am trying to decide between keeping the City and buying a second EV primarily for dog transport and city use, or replacing the City altogether with a single-car solution. The vehicles I am considering include the Kia Carens Clavis EV, Mahindra XEV 9S, Mahindra XEV 9e, BYD eMAX 7, and Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. My priorities are: Comfortable transport for two large dogs Highway touring ability Ease of parking and city usability Long-term ownership (8–10 years) Good ride comfort Reasonable running costs Would you recommend: 1. Keeping the Honda City and adding a practical EV (such as the Clavis EV), or 2. Moving to a single-car garage and choosing something like the XEV 9S, eMAX 7, or Hycross? Also, is there a midsize SUV (EV, hybrid, petrol or diesel) that offers: A low boot loading lip, Rear seats that fold nearly flat, Enough cargo length and width for two large dogs to comfortably lie down on highway trips, While still being manageable in city traffic and parking? Which vehicle would you choose for this specific use case and why?

Autocar India

•4d

Pick a single-car solution and buy the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. Your dogs get a low loading lip and a long, near-flat space with the third row folded, so they can actually lie side by side on highway runs. The hybrid makes touring simple with no charging hassles, calm cruising and a comfy ride, and Toyota’s durability fits an 8-10 year plan with sensible running costs.EV MPVs like the Kia Carens Clavis EV and BYD eMax 7 are great for city runs and dog space, but long trips with two dogs mean 30-40 minute fast-charge halts and patchy chargers once you leave big corridors. That’s a hassle you do not need. Mahindra XEV 9S and 9e are good choices, but their higher boot floors make them poorer dog haulers.You will wrestle with the Innova's size in tight parking, and it costs more upfront than adding a small EV, but day to day, it is still easy enough with light steering and cameras.If you must go smaller, the Kia Carens Clavis turbo petrol DCT is a solid choice, but fuel efficiency in the city won't be as good as the Hycross hybrid.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Rana

I am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus MT as my first car. This will primarily be a family car. My monthly running will be around 300-1,000 km in the Delhi NCR region. Please advise which one would be the better choice. Alternatively, should I consider the Kylaq Signature MT with dealership-installed accessories such as a 10-inch infotainment system and rear-view camera?

Autocar India

•1h

The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT will be our pick on account. The steering is lighter, clutch and manual gearbox feel smoother, and its backseat too is a bit more spacious than the Skoda Kylaq. If you're usage is primarily within the city, the Venue will be slightly easier to live with. However, if you drive on highways more often, the Kylaq feels more planted and more confident than the Hyundai. Additionally, the Kylaq's boot is also a bit better shaped, hence you can pack in some more luggage, useful during long drives or airport runs.As far as price goes, the Venue HX5 will be relatively more affordable than the Kylaq Signature Plus, while packing in similar (if not more) equipment. Hence, it comes across as better value.Overall, if you want an easy-to-drive, value-for-money pick, get the Venue. But if you drive on the highways regularly, you will enjoy driving the Kylaq, so be prepared to pay the premium it commands.

Hyundai Venue

Skoda Kylaq

View all Posts

Curated collections

MPVs

20 CARS

Vinfast Cars

4 CARS

Popular discussions right now

Balaji

•1w

I am looking to buy a 6/7-seater EV. My primary usage will be as a 4-seater, with occasional 6-seater use. I will mainly drive it in the city for my daily office commute and undertake long-distance trips of around 500 km once every two months. I have a solar setup at home and can charge the vehicle comfortably. My budget is Rs 30-40 lakh, although I can stretch it slightly if required.

Autocar India

•6d

You should go for the Mahindra XEV 9S. It's a proper three-row EV, and it fits your use case perfectly. With home solar charging, your running costs are very low, and the smooth, quiet drive is just right for city runs as a 4-seater. When you do need six or seven seats, the third row is reasonably spacious, and for your 500 km trip every couple of months, you’ll need just one quick top-up at a highway charger.Do note that with all three rows up, boot space is tight, so your highway trips will require some planning.Alternatively, consider the Kia Carens Clavis EV. It isn't as feature-rich and doesn't have as much range as the XEV 9S, but its third row is more comfortable for adults.

Mahindra XEV 9S

Kia Carens Clavis EV

Saransh Parnami

•3d

I am confused between the Nexon, XUV 3XO, and Venue as my first car. My running is expected to be 1,000-1,200 km per month. My priorities are: 1) Performance, 2) Mileage and ownership cost, 3) Features, and 4) Rear-seat and boot space. Please advise and suggest the best-value variant as well. I am inclined towards a manual.

Autocar India

•2d

Our first recommendation would be the new Venue Turbo Petrol Manual. It strikes the best balance for your priorities. The turbo petrol engine is punchy and enjoyable to drive, fuel efficiency is respectable, and Hyundai's ownership experience is generally hassle-free. The latest Hyundai Venue is also more spacious than before, particularly in the rear seat, and feels like a very well-rounded first car. For value, we would look at the SX Turbo Manual, which gets a good mix of features without stretching the budget too much.Our second choice would be the Mahindra XUV 3XO. If outright performance and rear seat space are your priorities, it is arguably the strongest car here. The turbo petrol engine is lively, the rear bench is among the widest in the segment, and it feels more substantial than the Venue. The downside is that fuel efficiency is not as strong, and the boot is one of the smallest in the class. The MX2 Pro or AX5 Manual would be the variants to consider, depending on your budget.The Tata Nexon would be our third choice. It remains a good all-round package with decent space, a strong feature list and good road presence. However, compared to the newer Venue and 3XO, it does not feel quite as polished, and neither the driving experience nor the ownership proposition is as compelling.

Abhishek Das

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India

•2d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

Honda Amaze

Skoda Kylaq

View all Posts

New car launches to explore