Autocar India
SS

Sidhharth Sahu

18w

I am confused between the Tata Altroz diesel and the XUV 3XO MPFI petrol. My running is around 1,500 km per month, and once every 2–3 months, I do long trips of about 2,500 km. Should I save money and buy the Altroz, or spend extra for the added comfort of the 3XO?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
18w
The Tata Altroz diesel is a well-rounded car. It is spacious, feature-rich, good to drive, and the diesel engine delivers good performance while being very fuel-efficient too. Since your monthly usage is on the higher side, you will benefit from lower running costs by opting for a diesel, compared to a petrol/turbo-petrol car. Also, the Altroz feels reassuringly stable on the highway, and even passengers will be comfortable over a long journey.
With the Mahindra XUV 3XO, you get high seating and ground clearance, and its turbo-petrol engine is strong and refined too; however, efficiency will not be as good as the diesel Altroz. Between the two, we'd recommend you go ahead with the Tata car.
Tata Altroz

Tata Altroz

LG

Laxman Gutte

17w

Hello Sidharth, Thanks for Posting your Query here...The Altroz is more suitable if you think Milage and Safety Norms.. It's good looking also and overall altroz is feature packed Car. You will get roughly average up to 18-19km/l on the Highway with speed 60-80km/hr If you like compact then Mahindra is okay but 3xo can't deliver more milage it's a stylish and Looks like small SUV like Punch Mahindra is wellknown for Strong engine and Comfert on Indian road You can add Maruti Suzuki models for milage if runing is more Celerio VXi is best for Comfert it's gives 22-23km/L average some times goes to 25Km/L

More questions on similar cars

KA

Karthik

2d

Hello, I am looking to buy a diesel SUV in a strict budget of 16 lakhs and have currently down-selected the XUV 3XO and the Hyundai Venue. Actually, I am living in town, so I will drive it in town, or I will get it onto the highway a few times a month. I am confused about purchasing a car between these 2 which car do I need to purchase?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

While both the Mahindra XUV 3XO and Hyundai Venue are competent compact SUVs, the Mahindra offers a more complete package for your budget. The diesel engine is strong and refined, making it well-suited to both town driving and highway trips. It also feels more spacious inside, especially in the rear seat, and offers a richer feature set for the money.The Venue's strengths lie in its proven ownership experience, widespread service network and easy-to-drive nature. However, it feels narrower inside and does not offer the same level of cabin space or overall value as the XUV 3XO.Since you will be using the car both in town and on highways a few times a month, the XUV 3XO's more powerful diesel engine, roomier cabin and better overall value give it an edge.However, if you are specifically considering an automatic diesel, the recommendation shifts towards the Hyundai Venue. The Venue uses a torque-converter automatic gearbox, which is smoother and more refined in everyday driving than the automated manual transmission (AMT) offered on the XUV 3XO diesel. For frequent stop-start driving, the Hyundai's gearbox delivers a noticeably better experience.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleHyundai Venue

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 6 Feb 2026