Autocar India
VA

Varn

8w

I have been driving a Maruti Dzire VDI for the last 14 years and usually don’t change cars often. I want to upgrade. I use my car daily for about 10 km for office-to-home travel. Over the weekend, I do about 400 km (to and fro, primarily on expressways), and once in three months I do a 700 km trip to my village through forests and small ghat sections (average speed may not exceed 60 km/h). I want a car with a budget of ₹20-22 lakh on road. I will be the primary driver, and I travel with my dog and my elderly mother who occasionally accompanies me. I’m looking for comfort, reliability, and ease of ownership. I’m not too focused on looks or sunroof etc., just driving comfort for me and comfort for my dog and mother.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
8w

The Kia Carens Clavis fits your requirements extremely well. Even if you do not need a seven-seater, folding the third row gives you a massive, flat boot area, which is ideal for carrying luggage along with your dog. The cabin is genuinely spacious and airy, with large windows and a relaxed seating position, which will keep your mother comfortable on longer journeys and your dog calmer and happier as well. Ride quality is one of its biggest strengths, making it a very stress-free car to drive over long distances.

A slightly smaller alternative is the Hyundai Alcazar. Think of it as a Creta Pro Max, which means it feels easier to place on the road and more compact to drive than the Carens Clavis. With the third row folded, it does offer a large and usable boot, but it is not as generous as the Carens when it comes to overall cabin room and luggage space. 

The ride quality is comfortable, though a bit stiffer compared to the Carens, especially on rougher surfaces.

Kia Carens Clavis

Kia Carens Clavis

More questions on similar cars

JP

Jairaj Patel

23h

I have a 2018 Ford EcoSport and want to upgrade my alloys. Currently, I have 16-inch alloys, but I am confused between sticking with 16 inches or upgrading to 17 inches. What would be the safer option? I am considering upgrading to Ford 17-inch alloys.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
9h

For a 2018 EcoSport used on mixed city roads with the odd rough patch, the safer and more balanced choice is to stick with 16-inch wheels. If you want a fuller look and better grip, shift to a 215/60 R16 tyre on a nice 16-inch alloy. This works well because the taller sidewall cushions bad roads better, you are less likely to bend a rim or cut a tyre in a pothole, and tyre choice and prices are friendlier. Steering will also feel a touch lighter in traffic compared to heavier 17-inch wheels.If you really want the Ford 17-inch alloys, it is doable, but you should be aware of the trade-offs. Ride will feel firmer and sharper over rough roads, the chance of tyre or rim damage increases on big potholes. Tyres will cost more with fewer brands to pick from. To keep the overall size close to stock, go for 215/50 R17 (this matches the original rolling size better than 205/50 R17, so your speedometer error stays small). Make sure there is no fouling with the wheel arch at full steering lock or with a full load. Pick tyres with the correct load and speed rating. If your spare remains a 16-inch, use it only to reach a tyre shop.Between the two, we would stick with 16-inch for everyday Indian conditions. It keeps the EcoSport comfortable and tough, which suits daily use best. If the look matters most, the 17-inch Ford alloys with 215/50 R17 tyres are the best way to upgrade.

RA

Rajneesh

2d

Hi, I have been using a Wagon R CNG for the past 4 years and now want to upgrade. My daily running is approximately 40 km in the city, along with around 400 km of outstation driving per month. Please suggest.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

With 40 km a day in the city and about 400 km outside each month, you drive around 1,600 km monthly, so staying with CNG makes sense for low running cost. In that use, the Maruti Baleno S-CNG mid variant (Delta) is the best step up from your Wagon R because it feels more solid on the highway, is calmer at 80-100 km/h, and is still easy to drive and park in the city.You will feel a clear jump in comfort and seat support on bad roads compared to your Wagon R. The steering is light for traffic but steadier on faster roads, so long drives feel less tiring. You also keep the Maruti service network you already know, and the CNG running cost stays close to what you are used to.A couple of things to note. The CNG tank eats into the boot, so big suitcases will need some planning. Also, CNG is only with a manual, so if you wanted an automatic for traffic, you would need to pick a petrol automatic instead and accept higher fuel cost.If you want a taller car and do more family trips, look at the Maruti Suzuki Brezza S-CNG VXi. It rides better on bad roads, the back seat is roomier, and it feels more relaxed on highways, but again the boot is smaller and it is manual only. If you prefer a compact footprint with a higher driving position, the Hyundai Exter CNG is a good city-friendly choice and it comes with a dual CNG tank setup that's below the boot floor giving you a very useable boot. Overall, for your mix of city use and monthly trips, the Baleno S-CNG lines up best with what you described. Trim availability can change, so do confirm the exact variant at the dealer.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Baleno
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Wagon R
VehicleHyundai Exter
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
KA

Kapil

1d

I own a 2012 Toyota Etios Liva petrol manual. We are a family of five, with a 6 km daily city drive and one highway trip every month of around 250 km or more. I have no issues with my current car, but I need to replace it as it is about to complete 15 years. Should I upgrade to a sedan or a compact SUV now, or should I wait? My budget for a new car is ₹7–12 lakh.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

The XUV 3XO stands out because of its width and cabin space. At over 1,820mm wide, it is one of the widest cars in the segment, which directly translates to better shoulder room and a more comfortable three-abreast rear seat. For a family of five, this matters in daily use, not just on paper. This Mahindra car also feels more modern, more powerful and more substantial to drive, making it a clear step up from your Etios Liva in both performance and overall experience.The Brezza, on the other hand, is the safer and more predictable choice. It is not as wide or as exciting, but it is comfortable enough for five, extremely easy to live with, and offers proven reliability with low maintenance. This Maruti car has a more relaxed driving nature, which works well for your mix of city runs and occasional highway trips.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza

Popular discussions right now

KY

Krishna Yadav

4d

I am planning to sell my Mahindra XUV700 and switch to the Renault Duster. I would like your expert opinion on whether this would be a good decision.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

On paper and in real-world ownership, these are very different cars, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO sits in a clear segment above. The XUV 700 is a bigger, more complete SUV. It offers more space, better road presence, stronger performance and a far richer overall experience, including the option of a third row and a more premium cabin. It is designed as a proper family SUV and feels more capable on highways and long drives.The Renault Duster, even in its new form, is a simpler, more driver-focused and lighter SUV. It will likely be easier to drive in the city and feel more rugged and straightforward, but it is still a step down in terms of overall size, features and cabin experience.So the decision really comes down to intent. If you are moving because you want something more compact, easier to use daily and less feature-heavy, then the Duster can make sense. But if you are expecting it to feel like an upgrade or even equal to the XUV700 in terms of space, comfort and overall experience, it will not.

VehicleRenault Duster
DE

Devakumar

4d

I have booked the Tata Sierra Adventure Plus petrol manual, but I am now confused between the petrol and diesel manual variants, particularly in terms of mileage and performance. I am not interested in an automatic transmission. My annual running is less than 6,000 km. Could you please advise which engine option would be more suitable for my usage? Additionally, I would appreciate any alternative suggestions for a spacious car with good mileage that fits my needs.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

The Tata Sierra is a big, heavy car, and the petrol engine, being a naturally aspirated unit, feels just about adequate, especially once you load it up or hit the highway. The diesel, on the other hand, suits the car far better with its stronger low-end pull, making overtakes easier and long-distance driving far more relaxed.That said, with your low annual running of under 6000 km, the petrol still makes sense if your usage is mostly in the city. It will feel smoother, easier to live with and perfectly adequate for everyday driving, even if it lacks that effortless punch on highways.If you are open to alternatives for a better petrol manual experience, the Renault Duster with its turbo petrol engine is a strong option. It feels far more effortless to drive, while naturally aspirated options like the Kia Seltos or Hyundai Creta offer a more refined and effortless experience than the Sierra petrol.

VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHyundai Creta
KS

Kunal Singh

6d

I am confused between buying the Tata Harrier Fearless Plus Dark Edition and the Kia Seltos GTX (A) diesel. My daily commute is around 60–70 km within Delhi NCR, and the car will be predominantly used in city conditions.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5d

For 60-70km a day inside Delhi NCR and mostly city use, the Kia Seltos GTX(A) diesel fits your brief better. It is easier to live with in traffic and tight parking than the Harrier Fearless Plus Dark; it will use less fuel in the city, and Kia’s service network is usually more consistent. It's diesel and automatic work smoothly at low speeds, and while it doesn’t have the grunt of the Harrier’s diesel, it is adequate for city use. Fuel efficiency is also a tad better on the Seltos. On service and reliability, Kia’s 1.5 diesel and this automatic have been around for years, and owner reports are generally good, while Tata has improved, but feedback on service quality still varies across workshops.There are trade-offs. The Seltos does not feel as big or have the same road presence as the Harrier, and you will feel sharp bumps a bit more at low speeds. If you often carry five adults or do long highway trips, the Harrier’s extra space and heavier, more solid feel are a plus.Overall, for your daily city grind and focus on service, reliability and fuel efficiency, the Seltos GTX(A) diesel is the better fit.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleTata Harrier

Posted on: 22 Feb 2026