Autocar India
1d

I’m 6’2” and my top priority is a comfortable driving posture, especially good thigh support and seating position. My current Grand i10 has become quite uncomfortable during longer drives. I absolutely loved the seating position and overall comfort of XUV 700 and I can say it is probably the best car that I have driven. However, I’m unsure about managing something that big in size in Bangalore traffic. I have taken the test drive of the new Tekton, but still found the seating position a bit awkward. Should I simply go for the XUV 7XO, or are there other petrol options that offer similar seating comfort while being easier to manage in the city? I want the car mostly for weekend city drives, with an outstation trip once every 2 months. My total running is around 3,000-4,000 km/year, so I am not considering a diesel car.

Verified
4h

Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO petrol automatic. Your priority is clear: a comfortable driving position with good thigh support and a commanding seating position. The XUV 7XO delivers exactly that, and at 6’2” you will appreciate the generous seat travel, supportive cushioning and the overall sense of space.Your concern about Bangalore traffic is understandable, but the XUV 7XO is not as intimidating as it looks. The steering is light at low speeds, the visibility is good and the automatic gearbox makes stop-go traffic far less tiring. Once you get used to the dimensions, it is perfectly manageable in the city.The Tekton is a good car, but the seating position is not as commanding and the overall comfort is not at the same level as the XUV 7XO.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleNissan Tekton
Mahindra XUV 7XO
Mahindra XUV 7XO
17h

Hi. I am looking to buy a car for myself and am confused between Kylaq 1.0 prestige plus vs Kushaq 2026 prestige. I need to travel from Hoskote to Whitefield in the morning, then return to my office at Varthur Kodi, and after work, travel back home to ITPL, Whitefield. This is my schedule from Monday to Saturday. I also have to take intermittent night duties as I am a doctor. I have a Honda Elevate in family and am concerned regarding turbo lag with Kylaq 6-speed. Is it advisable to upgrade to Kushaq 1.0 AT by spending additional 5.5 lakh. I also came across a social media post claiming that the Kylaq’s 6-speed automatic can be difficult to manoeuvre in bumper-to-bumper traffic. Please guide me on which would be the better choice for my usage.

Verified
5h

The Kylaq 1.0 TSI Prestige+ AT makes more sense for your requirements. Your daily commute involves significant city driving, so the compact dimensions and torque-converter automatic make it easier to manage Bengaluru traffic. The 1.0 TSI does have some initial turbo lag, but it isn't significant enough to be a deal-breaker. Once the turbo is on boost, the engine has good mid-range performance, while the automatic makes progress smooth and effortless.The Kushaq 1.0 AT is the more mature and comfortable car, and its new 8-speed torque-converter automatic is a considerable improvement, particularly in low-speed traffic. It also offers more space and feels more substantial. However, spending around Rs 5.5 lakh more is difficult to justify when the Kylaq already meets your requirements well. The presence of an Elevate in the family also reduces the need to pay extra for the larger SUV.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleSkoda Kushaq
VehicleHonda Elevate
17h

Hi AutoCar team, I live in Bangalore in a family of three with 2 adults and a 5 year old. My commute will be 3 days in a week with 16-16 km on the Outer Ring Road and am planning to go on weekend trips near Bangalore on highways with family luggage. I may sometimes go on hills like Ooty and Munnar but the car is not primarily for hill drives. Will a new Seltos NA IVT feel underpowered with these requirements and load conditions? Is CVT drone too much and at what speed and RPM does it become unpleasant. Also, how is it compared to Honda City CVT drone and insulation? What are the other alternatives?

Verified
6h

The Kia Seltos naturally aspirated IVT is actually a very sensible choice for your usage. Your commute on Bangalore ORR is stop-start, and the IVT is smooth and stress-free in traffic. For weekend highway trips with family and luggage, the 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol has enough power to cruise comfortably and overtake when needed. It will not feel underpowered in normal driving, but it is not a performance engine, so overtakes require a little planning when fully loaded.CVT drone is most noticeable when you accelerate hard and hold the throttle, typically during long overtakes or on steep inclines. However, the Seltos is better insulated than the Honda City, so the engine noise is less intrusive in the cabin. In everyday driving, it is not a major issue.Alternatives worth considering are the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI automatic and the Mahindra XUV 3XO automatic. The Kushaq’s turbo petrol engine offers stronger mid-range performance for highway overtakes, and the torque converter automatic is smooth. The XUV 3XO is spacious and feature-rich, but the boot is smaller than the Seltos, which matters for family trips.Overall, the Seltos IVT is a well-balanced choice for your usage. If you want a bit more performance for highway driving, the Kushaq 1.0 TSI automatic is worth a test drive.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleSkoda Kushaq
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleHonda City
2d

Hello, I have been riding a 125cc bike for quite a long time now, and I’m looking to upgrade to a better-looking bike with good performance. I’m emotionally attached to my vehicle and take very good care of them, so I’m looking for something that I can enjoy and keep for a long time. Most of my riding is within Pune city traffic, but I would also like to start exploring longer rides and weekend trips, which I haven’t really done so far. I’m not very familiar with all the good options currently available in the market. I have looked at the Harley-Davidson X440 and a couple of options from Triumph, but I’m still not sure what one would suit me the best. I would really appreciate your guidance in selecting the right bike based on my riding requirements, preferences and long-term ownership perspective.

Verified
9h

The Harley-Davidson X440 (we'd highly recommend stretching for the better looking & finished T, if you can) is a very likable machine and will offer you a big step up from your current 125cc machine. It is a relaxed roadster with a torquey single-cylinder engine and good comfort so if you want this sort of experience, it is one of the most capable options. Should you wish to opt for a sportier option, then you should look at the 350cc KTM 390 Duke and RE Guerrilla 450. The KTM is sharper and more frantic compared to the relatively tamer Guerrilla, but you could even prefer the RE for that very reason. Triumph's 350cc single-cylinder offerings are a good middle ground between the relaxed air-cooled roadsters and the sporty liquid-cooled nakeds. Of all the Triumphs, the Scrambler is the most versatile and comfortable and we'd recommend it also because if you want to start off-road riding, its a friendly machine. These are all starkly different bikes and a test ride of each will help you understand which one suits you best.

Harley Davidson X440
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
KTM 390 Duke
1d

​I am planning to change my car and upgrade from my 2019 Hyundai Creta 1.6 Diesel SX (Manual), which has run a solid 1.5 lakh kilometres. ​I have shortlisted the Mahindra 7XO AX7L Diesel AT. But my main dilemma is choosing between the 2WD and the AWD versions. ​My usage profile: ​Weekly running: ~410 km (85% highway, 15% city) ​Quarterly trips: ~2,000 km (family road trips) ​Intended ownership: 7+ years minimum ​I understand my regular highway runs do not strictly justify the AWD system. However, since I plan to keep the car long-term, I want to future-proof my purchase and avoid regretting skipping the AWD later. ​My questions for the forum: ​Is there a substantial difference in real-world fuel economy between the 2WD and AWD versions? ​If so, how much of a mileage drop should I expect? ​Looking forward to your insights!

Verified
10h

Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7L Diesel AT 2WD. Your usage is 85% highway with long family road trips, and the 2WD diesel automatic is the best fit for that. The AWD system adds weight and more mechanical components, which will reduce fuel efficiency by around 1-2 km/l in real-world conditions. Over 7 years and high mileage, that difference begins to add up. More importantly, AWD is only useful in low-traction situations like snow, mud or steep loose surfaces. On highways and well-maintained roads, it offers no real benefit. The 2WD version is already a very capable long-distance cruiser with strong performance, good stability and a comfortable ride. The money saved by skipping the AWD can be better spent on future maintenance. The only reason to choose AWD is if you regularly drive on challenging terrain or plan to use the car for off-road excursions. For your usage, the 2WD is the smarter long-term choice.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
14h

Hi Experts! I am a first-time car buyer and a new driver. I want to buy a sub-4-meter SUV. My daily usage will be between 25- 30 km. It is mostly for city driving in Delhi NCR. I intend to buy an automatic and like the Kylaq as an option. But my understanding is that it is expensive to maintain. Among other options that I am considering are the Venue and the 3XO. However, Venue has DCT, which I understand is not great for city driving. Could you give me some more guidance on maintenance of the Kylaq and, generally, if I have to choose among these 3, what should be the best option? To clarify, my budget is 12-15 lakhs. I have already looked at the Brezza as an option but did not like the feel of it. Sonet has been disregarded because there is a new Sonet coming next year. Thank you for your input!

Verified
11h

Go for the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI automatic. This Skoda car is the best fit for your usage and budget. The Kylaq uses a 6-speed torque converter automatic, which is smooth, reliable and well suited to stop-start traffic. It is not a DCT, so you do not have to worry about overheating or jerkiness in city conditions. The 1.0 TSI engine is proven and has a good ownership track record. Skoda's maintenance costs are not significantly higher than Hyundai or Mahindra, especially with service packages available. The Kylaq is also one of the best driver's cars in the segment, with a solid, planted feel and good ride quality.The Hyundai Venue DCT is a good choice but not ideal for your usage, as DCT gearboxes are not ideal for heavy city traffic. The Mahindra XUV 3XO is a strong alternative. It is spacious, feature-rich and has a good torque converter automatic gearbox, but it does not feel as engaging to drive as the Kylaq. Since you have already ruled out the Brezza and Sonet, the Kylaq is the clear recommendation. It will give you the best ownership experience and driving enjoyment over the next 5-10 years.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleKia Sonet
15h

I live in Delhi and travel to Gurugram around 25 km, on office days, with about 75% of the journey in bumper-to-bumper traffic. My total annual running is approximately 6,500 km. I also travel on highways when visiting my hometown, around three times a year, covering approximately 2,000 km annually. I currently own a 2020 Renault Kwid 0.8L MT. I am planning to buy a Tata Punch CNG AMT, either the Adventure or Accomplished Plus S variant. I am also open to suggestions for other cars. I am on a strict budget of under Rs. 12 lakh.

Verified
14h

Given your usage pattern of 6,500 km a year with predominantly bumper-to-bumper traffic and a strict budget of under Rs 12 lakh, the Tata Punch CNG AMT is actually a very sensible choice. The Punch is a well-rounded car with a comfortable ride, good ground clearance for Delhi roads and a robust build. The CNG AMT variant makes particular sense for your daily commute, as it keeps running costs low while the automatic transmission takes the stress out of heavy traffic.The Punch CNG also has a neatly packaged twin-cylinder CNG tank setup, which preserves boot space better than most rivals. For your occasional highway runs, the Punch is stable and comfortable enough, though it is not the most powerful car in the segment. The only real drawback is that performance on CNG is adequate rather than brisk, especially with the AC on, but for your usage this is not a major concern.If you are open to alternatives, the Maruti Brezza CNG is worth considering. This Maruti Suzuki car is a larger car with a more spacious cabin and a more powerful engine, but it is also more expensive and may stretch your budget.Overall, the Punch CNG AMT strikes the right balance between running costs, comfort and practicality for your specific usage and budget.

VehicleTata Punch
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
Tata Punch
Tata Punch