Autocar India
SR

Srinidhi

7h

I am planning to buy a car. Should I opt for the Mahindra XUV 3XO 1.2L torque converter or the Kia Seltos 1.5L CVT? I mainly drive in the city with occasional highway trips. Please answer considering the following: mileage, which transmission is better (torque converter or CVT), service experience (Kia vs Mahindra), comfort, engine smoothness, and reliability of the CVT vs the torque converter, as well as the overall reliability of the cars.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2h
Pick the Kia Seltos 1.5 CVT for mostly city use because it feels smoother in traffic, the 1.5 is very refined, and its economy will be more consistent when you crawl, stop and go. Kia’s service experience is generally quite good, too.
In the real world, expect the Seltos CVT to do roughly 10-11 kpl in the city and 14-15 kpl on the highway if you drive gently. As a turbo, the Mahindra XUV 3XO auto can dip into single digits in stop-go traffic, although it can match the Seltos IVT's efficiency on open roads.
The Kia Seltos is also the larger car, which will give you a more spacious cabin and boot, and a more premium in-cabin experience. Hence, between the two, the Seltos is the one to get.
Kia Seltos

Kia Seltos

More questions on similar cars

LA

Lalit

1d

I'm planning to buy a new car in the approximate 18 lakh range. I'm confused between the Creta SX Premium Summer Edition and the Seltos HTX(A) variant. While the Seltos has more features, its petrol NA engine felt underpowered, and the turbo version is above 20 lakh. I generally drive in the city and on highways, but I also visit hilly areas often. Can you suggest any other options in this range?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
9h

Pick the Hyundai Creta diesel manual. Your hill drives will benefit from the effortless pull of a diesel at low speeds, and this engine gives that without making you work the gearbox. It also does better mileage than the petrol in all conditions, and the Creta’s ride is a touch softer, so your city commutes and long highway runs will be comfier. The only catch is you may give up a few of the Seltos’ showy features at this price, and the new-gen Kia Seltos is a bit more spacious than the Creta.If you’re fixed on petrol and want more pull than the Creta or Seltos' 1.5 NA petrol, look at the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI or Volkswagen Taigun 1.0 TSI. Their turbo engines have strong mid‑range for hills and overtakes, and you can find good manual or automatic variants within your budget. They’re a size smaller inside than Creta/Seltos, and service reach isn’t as wide in smaller towns, but they drive superbly. Alternatively, check out the new Renault Duster, which offers both turbo-petrol engines across a wide price range.

VehicleHyundai Creta
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleVolkswagen Taigun
VehicleSkoda Kushaq
VehicleRenault Duster
MA

Maheshwar

1d

Hi experts, I have decided to go for the facelifted Seltos. Now I'm confused between the 1.5 Turbo Petrol iMT and the 1.5 Diesel MT. I did not get a chance to test-drive the iMT version, but I drove the diesel MT. My requirements are an enthusiastic driving experience on highways and strong overtaking performance both in the city and on highways. Very high speeds are not of much interest to me, but quick and powerful acceleration is. The specifications of the 1.5 Turbo Petrol look impressive and on par with the diesel. With the iMT, will I still get the low-rpm torque that a diesel usually generates? Also, for an aggressive driving style, I am concerned that there will be a significant difference in fuel economy. Is there a significant difference between the two engines in terms of pure performance, and will the turbo-petrol still make sense despite giving lower mileage for an enjoyable drive? My running would be around 8,000km a year, with a 60:40 split between highway and city driving. Also, will there be any issues with the panoramic sunroof in the long term? I have seen some posts on social media about them breaking and leaking. Looking forward to your answer. Thanks in advance.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
8h

With your usage pattern and priorities, the Seltos 1.5 Turbo Petrol iMT would be the recommendation. The 1.5-litre turbo petrol is the more exciting engine of the two. It revs more freely, responds more eagerly to throttle inputs and feels noticeably quicker when accelerating hard. The diesel remains a very capable engine, but its strength lies in effortless torque and efficiency rather than outright performance.As for low-rpm pull, the diesel still has an advantage. It delivers its torque earlier and feels stronger at very low engine speeds. However, the turbo petrol has enough mid-range punch that most buyers will not miss the diesel's low-end grunt. In fact, once the turbo is on boost, the petrol feels more energetic and rewarding, especially during overtakes and spirited driving.Given your annual running of just 8,000km, fuel economy should not be the deciding factor. The diesel will undoubtedly be more efficient, particularly when driven aggressively, but the annual fuel cost difference is unlikely to be significant enough to outweigh the enjoyment offered by the turbo petrol.As for the panoramic sunroof, there is no widespread reliability issue with the Kia Seltos. The occasional reports of leaks or shattered glass tend to be isolated incidents that gain disproportionate attention on social media.

VehicleKia Seltos

Popular discussions right now

SP

Saransh Parnami

3d

I am confused between the Nexon, XUV 3XO, and Venue as my first car. My running is expected to be 1,000-1,200 km per month. My priorities are: 1) Performance, 2) Mileage and ownership cost, 3) Features, and 4) Rear-seat and boot space. Please advise and suggest the best-value variant as well. I am inclined towards a manual.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Our first recommendation would be the new Venue Turbo Petrol Manual. It strikes the best balance for your priorities. The turbo petrol engine is punchy and enjoyable to drive, fuel efficiency is respectable, and Hyundai's ownership experience is generally hassle-free. The latest Hyundai Venue is also more spacious than before, particularly in the rear seat, and feels like a very well-rounded first car. For value, we would look at the SX Turbo Manual, which gets a good mix of features without stretching the budget too much.Our second choice would be the Mahindra XUV 3XO. If outright performance and rear seat space are your priorities, it is arguably the strongest car here. The turbo petrol engine is lively, the rear bench is among the widest in the segment, and it feels more substantial than the Venue. The downside is that fuel efficiency is not as strong, and the boot is one of the smallest in the class. The MX2 Pro or AX5 Manual would be the variants to consider, depending on your budget.The Tata Nexon would be our third choice. It remains a good all-round package with decent space, a strong feature list and good road presence. However, compared to the newer Venue and 3XO, it does not feel quite as polished, and neither the driving experience nor the ownership proposition is as compelling.

VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleTata Nexon
AD

Abhishek Das

4d

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 8 Jun 2026