I want to buy 6/ 7 Seater car, budget-friendly. Also, more comfortable in all three rows. I chose Kia Clavis and Xl6. I did test drive both vehicles. I'm comfortable with XL6. More leg room in all three rows. But experts in many forum they praised Clavis. Most of my family members are above 5.9. So I feel XL 6 would be a better option. Suggest to me what's best?

autocar.india

•1d

Based on your usage and priorities, the Hyundai Alcazar 2.0 naturally aspirated petrol would be our recommendation. Your monthly running is low, the third row will only be used occasionally, and you're looking for a comfortable, feature-rich family car that can be kept for 7 to 10 years. The Alcazar strikes the right balance. Its 2.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine is a simple, proven unit that should be easy to own over the long term, while also offering better performance than the Kia Caren's 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine. Hyundai cars also have a strong reputation for reliability and aftersales support, which becomes even more important for long-term ownership.As for the E20/E30 question, there's little reason to worry. The Alcazar's 2.0 engine is likely E10 compliant but will run on E20 just fine, and while higher ethanol blends can lead to a slight reduction in fuel efficiency, they are unlikely to have a significant impact on long-term reliability.The MG Hector 1.5 turbo petrol is a good engine, but it is a heavier car and the turbo petrol will not offer any real advantage in your running. The Carens is the more practical and better packaged family car, but since you aren't frequently using the third row, the Alcazar is the better pick.

Hyundai Alcazar

MG Hector

Kia Carens

autocar.india

•1d

Given your requirements, the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga CNG is the most sensible recommendation. Your monthly running of around 1,000 km, with occasional spikes, does not justify a diesel, especially with the higher purchase cost and maintenance associated with modern diesel engines. The Ertiga CNG strikes the right balance between low running costs, reliability and practicality. It is a proven 7-seater with a comfortable ride, good service network and low maintenance costs, which is important given your plan to keep the car for 7-10 years. The CNG system is factory-fitted and well-integrated, making it a far better option than any aftermarket CNG installation. The only drawback is the reduced boot space with the CNG tank, but for your usage pattern and occasional rental plans, the overall cost savings outweigh this limitation. If you need more space and comfort, the Maruti Suzuki XL6 CNG is a good alternative, offering a more premium cabin and captain seats in the middle row making it a strict 6-seater, but the Ertiga remains the more value-driven choice. Alternatively, there is also the Toyota Rumion, which is Toyota's version of the Ertiga so if there is a lower waiting time, you can check out the Rumion too.

Maruti Suzuki XL6

Toyota Rumion

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

autocar.india

•1h

With 9,000 km a year and a 60% city/40% highway split, the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder strong hybrid is the better fit. The hybrid system delivers excellent fuel efficiency in city traffic, where the car runs on electric power for the majority. This makes a noticeable difference in running costs over time. On the highway, this Toyota car is comfortable and stable, and the hybrid system still contributes to efficiency. The Kia Seltos IVT is a very good car with a smooth automatic gearbox and a more premium cabin, but at your usage level the hybrid advantage is more meaningful than the extra features. The Hyryder is also backed by Toyota’s strong reliability reputation, which is important for long-term ownership. The only drawback is that the Hyryder does not feel as quick as this Kia car on the highway and has a smaller boot. Overall, the Hyryder hybrid is the smarter choice for your usage pattern.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Kia Seltos