Autocar India
MI

Mina

23w

Is the automatic Ignis a good buy under ₹10 lakh for city driving, good mileage, and low maintenance?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
22w
The Maruti Suzuki Ignis AMT has a nice engine, delivers good fuel economy, and is affordable to maintain. While it is a decent choice of an automatic car for city driving, there are other options for under Rs 10 lakhs.
We'd recommend you look at the Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT too. It is more spacious than the Ignis, and delivers a more comfortable ride too, while also offering good fuel economy and low maintenance costs.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

More questions on similar cars

SK

Swapnil Kadam

12h

I currently own a Wagon R CNG. My daily running is 40 km, with an outstation tour of 900 km every 2 months. I am confused between the Fronx CNG & 2026 Tata Punch CNG AMT. Fronx is clearly a more refined car & also has a bigger footprint. However, I can't ignore the convenience of AMT in city driving. Despite all the feedback regarding Tata quality issues, it is difficult to deny that Punch has been selling in great numbers. Please advise.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
9m

Your confusion is valid. The Tata Punch gives you the convenience of an AMT, but the Fronx is simply the more complete car in everyday use. It is more refined, more stable on highways and more comfortable for longer drives, which matters because you are doing regular outstation trips. It is also bigger, with better legroom and a longer wheelbase, so it feels more like an upgrade from your Wagon R.On efficiency, both are strong, but the Maruti Suzuki Fronx edges ahead on ARAI figures. It also offers better boot usability and overall practicality, which matters when you travel.Coming to the Punch, its biggest advantage is clear. The CNG plus AMT combination makes city driving very easy and removes clutch effort completely. It is also safer on paper, with a strong crash rating, which adds peace of mind. However, it is a smaller car, less spacious and not as comfortable. Compared to the Fronx, the engine is also less refined and not as punchy.

VehicleTata Punch
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Wagon R
VI

Vikram

2d

Hi, I am planning to buy an automatic car for city use only, as I already own an XUV700 for highway driving. This new car will be on a 3-4 year company lease. I have shortlisted the Brezza ZXi automatic and the Kia Sonet diesel automatic HTX. Which one would suit me better? Also, is it worth waiting for the Brezza facelift, which is expected soon? My primary considerations are a smooth city drive, good fuel efficiency, and a nice cabin.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

City-only use on a 3-4 year lease, with a smooth ride, low running costs and a pleasant cabin on top, in that brief, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi AT fits you better. In slow, busy traffic, the Brezza feels calmer and quieter because it is a petrol car, and its automatic transmission is smooth and easy to use. It also rides over broken patches more softly than the Kia Sonet. For short trips and lots of stop-start driving, a petrol is also simpler to live with.Pick the Sonet diesel automatic HTX only if your city runs are long and steady every day, and you care most about saving fuel. The Sonet can use less fuel in that case, and its cabin does look and feel richer than the Brezza. But it is a bit firmer over bumps, and you will hear the diesel at idle.The Brezza facelift is expected to be launched later this year and could get the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol from the Fronx, to fit into the lower 18% tax bracket. Overall, for a quiet, smooth, no-fuss city car, the Brezza ZXi automatic lines up best with what you want.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleKia Sonet
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
MK

Manish Kulkarni

1d

Which car should I buy if I plan to do road trips across India, including Ladakh, the Spiti circuit, followed by the 7 sisters & South India, with my family? I am looking for a five-seater, preferably diesel or hybrid. I can wait up to six months, until around Diwali. My yearly running will be around 10,000-12,000 km, which consists of 65% highway, 15% ghat roads, and 30% city driving. I live in the Thane suburbs (Dombivli). Good service, support and reliability are very important to me. The options I am considering are: XUV 7XO, Scorpio, Vision S, Thar Roxx, Duster (Hybrid), and Honda Elevate (Hybrid). Should I consider an AWD or 4x4 model, or are there any other options you would recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
34m

From your list, the Mahindra Scorpio N 4x4 diesel is the safest fit for this use. As a five-seater with the last row folded, it offers a large boot, a tough body and proper 4x4 with low range for slush, snow or rocky terrain. It also has strong pulling power on steep hill roads when fully loaded. Mahindra’s wide service network on these routes is an added advantage when you are far from cities.Be aware that the Scorpio N is not as quiet or as comfortable on long highways as softer monocoque SUVs, and in the city, the ride can feel a bit bouncy. The Mahindra XUV 7XO is the better road car. It is more comfortable and refined, but for your intended usage, it is not as robust or as versatile as the Scorpio N, especially for tougher terrain in the Himalayas where the Scorpio N’s higher ground clearance and proper 4x4 make a real difference. The same limitation applies to options like the Renault Duster Hybrid and Honda Elevate.As for the Mahindra Thar Roxx, it is less comfortable than the Scorpio N, especially in terms of seating and long-distance usability.

VehicleMahindra Scorpio N
VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleMahindra Thar Roxx
VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleHonda Elevate

Popular discussions right now

KY

Krishna Yadav

5d

I am planning to sell my Mahindra XUV700 and switch to the Renault Duster. I would like your expert opinion on whether this would be a good decision.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

On paper and in real-world ownership, these are very different cars, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO sits in a clear segment above. The XUV 700 is a bigger, more complete SUV. It offers more space, better road presence, stronger performance and a far richer overall experience, including the option of a third row and a more premium cabin. It is designed as a proper family SUV and feels more capable on highways and long drives.The Renault Duster, even in its new form, is a simpler, more driver-focused and lighter SUV. It will likely be easier to drive in the city and feel more rugged and straightforward, but it is still a step down in terms of overall size, features and cabin experience.So the decision really comes down to intent. If you are moving because you want something more compact, easier to use daily and less feature-heavy, then the Duster can make sense. But if you are expecting it to feel like an upgrade or even equal to the XUV700 in terms of space, comfort and overall experience, it will not.

VehicleRenault Duster
DE

Devakumar

6d

I have booked the Tata Sierra Adventure Plus petrol manual, but I am now confused between the petrol and diesel manual variants, particularly in terms of mileage and performance. I am not interested in an automatic transmission. My annual running is less than 6,000 km. Could you please advise which engine option would be more suitable for my usage? Additionally, I would appreciate any alternative suggestions for a spacious car with good mileage that fits my needs.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5d

The Tata Sierra is a big, heavy car, and the petrol engine, being a naturally aspirated unit, feels just about adequate, especially once you load it up or hit the highway. The diesel, on the other hand, suits the car far better with its stronger low-end pull, making overtakes easier and long-distance driving far more relaxed.That said, with your low annual running of under 6000 km, the petrol still makes sense if your usage is mostly in the city. It will feel smoother, easier to live with and perfectly adequate for everyday driving, even if it lacks that effortless punch on highways.If you are open to alternatives for a better petrol manual experience, the Renault Duster with its turbo petrol engine is a strong option. It feels far more effortless to drive, while naturally aspirated options like the Kia Seltos or Hyundai Creta offer a more refined and effortless experience than the Sierra petrol.

VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHyundai Creta
RO

Rohin

1w

I am confused about buying the AMT version of the Skoda Kylaq, Tata Nexon, or Maruti Fronx. My budget is between 11 and 13 lakh. My usage is mostly city driving of about 1,000 km per month, with occasional long highway drives.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

Between the three, the Skoda Kylaq is the best automatic for the money. It doesn’t use an AMT but a proper 6‑speed torque-converter with the 1.0 TSI, which is smooth, robust and easily the nicest for your occasional highway runs.The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo also gets the same 6‑speed torque-converter auto, and while it is refined and efficient, it doesn’t have the same solid, European feel or driving dynamics as the Kylaq. However, from an overall cost-of-ownership point of view - price, fuel efficiency and service, the Fronx is likely to work out cheaper.The Tata Nexon in your budget doesn’t get a torque-converter. You mainly have a 6‑speed AMT, which is convenient but nowhere near as smooth or quick as a proper automatic. There is also a 7‑speed DCA dual‑clutch option, which is noticeably better than the AMT, but still not as seamless as the autos in the Kylaq and Fronx, and it can push the price higher.For 11-13 lakh, 1,000km a month in the city and the odd long drive, we would pick the Kylaq auto. If budget discipline and running costs are top priority, go for the Fronx 1.0 turbo automatic.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleTata Nexon

Posted on: 15 Nov 2025