Latest questions answered by experts
Saurabh Misra
•4hI live in Himachal Pradesh and am looking for a dependable SUV for long-distance drives in the mountains as well as highways in the plains. This vehicle will replace my 18-year-old Mitsubishi Pajero. I would appreciate your suggestions for a reliable and capable replacement suited to my usage.

Autocar India
For that requirement, the Toyota Fortuner is the safest bet. It feels built for bad roads, can be had with proper low-range four-wheel drive for steep, loose climbs and snow, and Toyota’s service reach is strong even in smaller hill towns. On highways, it sits steady at speed, the seats are supportive, and you can load it up with family and bags without worry. Coming from a Pajero, you will feel the same go-anywhere confidence but with a far more modern cabin and easier ownership.Two things to keep in mind. It is very expensive for what it is, and in slow, broken patches, the ride can feel firm. It is also a big SUV, so narrow village lanes and tight hotel parking will require patience.If you want most of that ability for a lot less money, look at the Mahindra Thar Roxx. It too can be had with low-range four-wheel drive, strong pull at low speed for hairpins, and Mahindra support is widespread in the North. You give up some highway polish, and it may not be as rock-solid reliable as a Toyota, but it is a serious mountain tool. Overall, the Fortuner fits your brief best; the Thar Roxx is the strong value alternative.
Obiwan
•19hHi Autocar Team, I would love your opinion on my use case. My situation: I am relocating to our farm, which is about 200 km from Bangalore. The car will be used occasionally for drives between my village and Bangalore (likely at least once a month), and otherwise as the primary vehicle for local travel, including trips to nearby towns, temples, and the Western Ghats. Requirements: Good boot space, as we will often carry a lot of haul (for example, kitchen supplies). Comfortable for a family of four, including elderly parents. Captain seats in the middle row would be preferred. The last 2-3 km to the farm is on unpaved/uneven roads, and nearby roads may also be inconsistent. I am unsure whether a body-on-frame vehicle is necessary or overkill for this usage. Currently using a 2006 Swift, which struggles on such terrain. Budget: Initially ₹20 lakh, now stretching to the mid-₹20 lakh range. Cars I have test-driven: Mahindra Scorpio N - Did not like the body roll Mahindra XUV700 - Too plush/soft for my needs Mahindra XUV300 - Felt underpowered Mahindra Thar Roxx - Loved it, but not practical for family EVs are not feasible due to an unreliable power supply Current bias: Toyota Innova Crysta - After driving it, it felt like the most suitable, reliable option for my use case Concerns: Automatic vs manual (Crysta is manual only) Diesel longevity given future regulations Long-term ownership (10-15 years) Am I making the right choice with the Innova Crysta, or are there better alternatives I should consider?

Autocar India
You've done a lot of research, and for the most part, you're right about the Toyota Innova Crysta. The ladder frame chassis means it can take a beating, it's almost flawlessly reliable and will run for decades on end, and even when it's time for maintenance, it should be relatively reasonable, too. We would have recommended the Toyota Hycross hybrid, which is a more sophisticated version of the Crysta in every aspect, but as you said, it's out of your budget. Do note, higher Crysta variants push Rs 30 lakh on the road themselves. That said, we don't feel a ladder frame chassis is strictly necessary given your usage. While tough, it does make the ride incredibly busy on rough patches, it feels quite heavy to drive, and it places the cabin higher, which could make ingress and egress cumbersome for your parents down the line. An automatic would have been ideal, but given your usage is infrequent, a manual should be easy enough to live with. While the future of diesel is uncertain in the Delhi NCR, the rest of the country hasn't seen a change in policy for some time, and if you're keen on a diesel car, you should go for it. While the Innova Crysta does seem like your best bet, you should also check out an often overlooked three-row SUV, the Hyundai Alcazar. It's not as powerful as the Innova, but it is far more sophisticated, easy to drive and cheaper to buy. Plus, you get the option of a diesel automatic, and Hyundai's service network is widespread and of good quality. Though a monocoque, it'll handle rural rough patches just fine, too, so as an alternative, we think it's worth consideration as well.
devang N patadia
•17hMy daily usage will be around 70-80 km, and I am looking for a CNG car without compromising too much on boot space. I have shortlisted the Maruti Suzuki Invicto CNG / (assuming you meant a Maruti CNG MPV like Ertiga/XL6), but I am confused about which variant to choose. The LXi and VXi variants seem sufficient, but I do not want to miss out on features like DRLs and LED headlamps, which are available in the ZXi variant. Is the ZXi variant a good option at around ₹15.2 lakh, considering it still misses features like a 10-inch infotainment system, sunroof, ventilated seats, leather seats, and a 360-degree camera? I am a first-time buyer and have not yet started learning to drive. Also, could you advise on the government’s future policy regarding E85/E100 fuel and how it may impact my decision?

Autocar India
Your requirement is clear. You want CNG without compromising boot space, and this is exactly where the Maruti Suzuki Victoris stands out. Unlike most CNG cars, including the Grand Vitara, the Victoris uses an underbody-mounted CNG tank, which means the boot remains largely usable for luggage. In comparison, the Grand Vitara’s CNG setup eats into the boot quite heavily, limiting practicality for family use.This is the biggest real-world advantage of the Victoris, and it directly addresses your concern.Now, coming to your variant confusion. The ZXi is the right choice. You already value DRLs and LED headlamps, and these are features you will notice every day. The missing features you mentioned, like a bigger screen, sunroof or 360 camera, are good to have, but they do not impact daily usability, especially as a first-time buyer. What matters more is ease of driving, visibility and comfort, all of which the ZXi already delivers well.On the fuel policy side, you do not need to worry. CNG cars are completely unaffected by ethanol blending. Even if fuel moves from E20 to E27 gradually, it will not impact you. Higher blends like E85 or E100 will require completely different engines and will be introduced slowly alongside existing fuels, not replace them.
Bm
•1dI have been using a Kia Sonet iMT for the past 5 years, but it has recently started giving gear shift and locking issues. I am now planning to buy a new automatic car within a budget of ₹15-16 lakh. A key requirement is front ventilated seats, as I have an open parking space, and the car tends to heat up significantly. My usage is primarily city driving, around 1,000-1,200 km per month.

Autocar India
The Skoda Kylaq is one of the few cars in your budget that offers ventilated seats along with a proper torque converter automatic, which is smoother and more reliable for city driving compared to AMTs or DCTs. That directly addresses your daily usage of 1000-1200 km in the city, where ease of driving and comfort matter the most.What also works strongly in its favour is the overall driving experience. The Kylaq has a punchy turbo petrol engine, good ride quality and feels more stable than most compact SUVs. So even when you step out for occasional highway drives, you feel confident and composed. The cabin is well built and feels premium enough for long-term ownership.Now, looking at alternatives. Cars like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Sonet and Tata Nexon also offer ventilated seats in this price range. However, all three cars are offered with DCT gearboxes in petrol automatics, which can feel jerky in slow traffic over time. In comparison, the Kylaq’s automatic is simply easier and more relaxed to live with.
Harshith Vadnala
•6hHi, I live in Gurugram and am planning to buy my first car. We are a family of four, including one child and my mother (60+). I have shortlisted the Tata Sierra Accomplished Plus AT and the Tata Nexon Fearless+ S AT, but I am confused between the vehicle choice and fuel options. I am inclined towards diesel, as I plan to travel to my hometown, Hyderabad, by road twice a year. Mileage and concerns around ethanol-blended fuel are also influencing my decision.

Autocar India
Your usage and priorities make the decision quite clear. You want safety, space for family, including an elderly passenger, highway capability for long trips like Gurugram to Hyderabad, and good efficiency. The Tata Sierra delivers strongly on all of these. It has a 5-star BNCAP rating for both adult and child protection, which directly addresses your safety requirements. It is also a larger, more comfortable car than the Tata Nexon, with better rear seat space and ride comfort, which will matter for your mother on long drives.On the diesel vs petrol question, diesel suits your usage better. You have long highway runs planned, and diesel gives you better efficiency and stronger torque for effortless cruising.The Tata Nexon diesel automatic is still a very good option. It also has strong safety credentials and will be easier to drive in the city due to its smaller size. But compared to the Sierra, it feels more compact, less comfortable for long journeys and not as premium overall.
Nitin puri
•1dHi, My current car is a Skoda Superb L&K, which has done around 18,400 km. I really like the Volkswagen Tayron R-Line. Is it worth upgrading to the Tayron, or should I continue with the Superb, considering it is already a fantastic car?

Autocar India
With a 2023 Skoda Superb L&K that has only 18,400 km on it, I would not switch unless you clearly need what the Volkswagen Tayron R-Line gives you: a higher seat, easier entry, and better clearance for rough roads or steep speed breakers. For your mix of city and highway use in a near-new car, keeping the Superb makes more sense right now.Three reasons. First, the Superb has a roomier back seat, so family trips are easier. Second, at this mileage, your car is almost new, so changing now will mean a big hit on resale, plus fresh tax and insurance for gains that may be small in daily use. Third, the move from a long, low car to a taller one changes the feel: you sit higher and see more, but the Superb's suspension is soft and plush while the VW's is a bit more sporty in the way it rides, especially on big wheels as the R-Line gets.Overall, unless you have a clear need for the higher seat and rough-road ease, holding on to your Superb a bit longer is the smarter move.
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.

