Autocar India
SM

Saurabh Misra

6w

I live in Himachal Pradesh and am looking for a dependable SUV for long-distance drives in the mountains as well as highways in the plains. This vehicle will replace my 18-year-old Mitsubishi Pajero. I would appreciate your suggestions for a reliable and capable replacement suited to my usage.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6w

For that requirement, the Toyota Fortuner is the safest bet. It feels built for bad roads, can be had with proper low-range four-wheel drive for steep, loose climbs and snow, and Toyota’s service reach is strong even in smaller hill towns. On highways, it sits steady at speed, the seats are supportive, and you can load it up with family and bags without worry. Coming from a Pajero, you will feel the same go-anywhere confidence but with a far more modern cabin and easier ownership.

Two things to keep in mind. It is very expensive for what it is, and in slow, broken patches, the ride can feel firm. It is also a big SUV, so narrow village lanes and tight hotel parking will require patience.

If you want most of that ability for a lot less money, look at the Mahindra Thar Roxx. It too can be had with low-range four-wheel drive, strong pull at low speed for hairpins, and Mahindra support is widespread in the North. You give up some highway polish, and it may not be as rock-solid reliable as a Toyota, but it is a serious mountain tool. Overall, the Fortuner fits your brief best; the Thar Roxx is the strong value alternative.

Toyota Fortuner

Toyota Fortuner

SM

Saurabh Misra

6w

Thank you for the response. Fortuner, expensive that it is, still has been on my wish list ever since I started exploring options mainly due to it’s off road performance and dependability. Your response has given me a lot of confidence in going for it. Amongst its 4x4 models, which one would you recommend? And does Legender need a consideration too?

Want to sell your car?

Sell your car at the right price, without the stress.

More questions on similar cars

AA

Anuj Agarwal

8h

I bought a pre-owned Hyundai Elantra 2018 SX (o) vtvt petrol variant in March 2025 with an odometer reading of 64k km for 8.5Lakh. I've clocked it to 84k km currently, and the car is in very good condition. However, the mileage is very low (around 6-7 city and 14-15 highway) because of which I'm thinking of upgrading to an EV. Should I upgrade now, or should I wait for some time to get the most use out of the car, and what would be the optimum selling price of the car?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5h

Considering you bought the car for Rs. 8.5 lakh and have added another 20,000km to the odometer, a realistic selling price today would be slightly below what you paid for it, assuming the car remains in excellent condition.One reason for this is that resale values of older used cars have softened in recent years, partly because lower GST rates and aggressive discounts on new cars have narrowed the price gap between new and used vehicles. As a result, buyers today are less willing to pay a premium for older used cars than they were a few years ago.Unless the fuel bills are becoming a major concern, it would make sense to continue using the Elantra for a while longer. It is already through its steepest depreciation phase, remains a comfortable long-distance car and appears to be in good mechanical condition.If you're considering a move to a midsize EV, it may be worth waiting for the Tata Sierra EV, which is expected to be unveiled on June 30. It has the potential to be one of the most compelling options in the segment and could be worth evaluating before making a final decision.

VehicleTata Sierra EV

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Curated collections

Posted on: 30 Apr 2026