I want to buy an automatic car for my wife, who is a learner. Please advise between the Renault Kwid/Kwid Climber and the Maruti Suzuki Alto K10.

Autocar India

•1h

We have not heard of any confirmed facelift for the Citroen Aircross X in June, so that seems unlikely for now. Based on your needs, the Citroen Aircross X 1.2 turbo automatic would suit you better than the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder for long highway trips.The Citroen Aircross offers a noticeably more comfortable back seat. It’s wide, has good thigh support, and the backrest angle is spot-on for long journeys. Ride quality is supple even on uneven surfaces, and the car stays planted at highway speeds, so rear passengers don’t get tossed around. The 1.2‑litre turbo engine has enough punch for easy overtakes, and the automatic gearbox shifts smoothly. As a five-seater, the boot is also generous, which makes it ideal for road trips.The only real drawback is Citroen’s inconsistent sales and service network. Before buying, gauge how proactive your local dealer is. If they’re indifferent during the sales process, expect even less enthusiasm during service visits. If that’s the case, it’s best to walk away.Opt for the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder only if you prioritise Toyota’s bulletproof reliability and after-sales support. But for your stated priorities, which are highway comfort and rear-seat space, the Citroen Aircross remains the more enjoyable and relaxed choice.

Citroen Aircross

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Autocar India

•5h

Go for the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX(O) 7-seater, as it best fits your requirements. It is very smooth and refined to drive for long hours, the hybrid automatic powertrain is efficient, and it stays steady and planted at highway speeds. Space is generous across all rows; the middle-row captain seats feature ottomans (leg rests), and Toyota’s wide service network gives peace of mind. On the highway, the hybrid still uses less fuel than a turbo petrol like in the Skoda Kodiaq, so you will stop less often for fuel, and the top trim comes loaded with all the convenience, comfort and safety features you'd want.One thing to be aware of: with all three rows up, the boot is small, so carrying seven people plus bags will require some planning. Also, the cabin feels solid but not as rich as the Skoda. Pick the Skoda Kodiaq only if you want a more premium feel and stronger performance, and you are okay with higher fuel use and a smaller service network.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Skoda Kodiaq

Autocar India

•21h

Between your two options, neither is ideal if your priority is comfortably seating three people in the rear. The Hyundai Venue has a relatively narrow cabin, which makes it tight for three adults, while the Skoda Kushaq has a heavily contoured rear seat that is very comfortable for two, but not as accommodating for three.Between the two, the Kushaq is still the more comfortable car overall. It belongs to a segment above, so it offers more knee room and better overall comfort. Its torque converter automatic is also smoother and better suited to city driving compared to the Venue’s DCT, which can feel slightly jerky in slow traffic.If rear-seat comfort for three passengers is a key requirement, it is worth looking beyond your shortlist at the Mahindra XUV 3XO. It has a wider cabin than the Venue and the Kushaq, which makes it more accommodating for three passengers at the back. It also gets a smooth torque converter automatic paired with a strong turbo-petrol engine.

Hyundai Venue

Skoda Kushaq

Mahindra XUV 3XO