Autocar India
22w

I currently own a Triumph Tiger Sport 660 and am looking to upgrade to a middleweight adventure tourer, which would be more versatile and have better suspension. I have shortlisted the BMW 900GS Adventure and the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro. My budget is 20-22 lakhs maximum. Which one should I go for, or is there any other option which I am missing?

Verified
22w

Between the two bikes you are choosing from, the Triumph Tiger 900 would be our recommendation. Between the GT and Rally Pro, we would recommend sticking with the former if you don't plan to go off-road very often. The Tiger has better seat and suspension comfort, and coming from your smaller Tiger Sport 660, you'll be familiar with the Triumph ownership experience too. 

However, if you don't want to spend as much money, then the smart way to do this would be to get a Honda XL750 Transalp and upgrade the wheels and suspension with the huge chunk you'll save. Even then, you'll come in well under what you'd spend on a brand-new Tiger 900. The Transalp is realistically just as quick and capable, while being a more manageable bike to ride and own too. 

We'd recommend visiting a Honda BigWing dealer as well as speaking to your nearest authorised Triumph dealership to find out more details before you pull the trigger. 

Triumph Tiger 900

Triumph Tiger 900

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

22w

Great suggestion

More questions on similar bikes

4d

I'm planning to buy a bike with a budget of around Rs. 3 lakh. My primary use will be daily city commuting to the office, but I also want to do occasional long-distance touring. I haven't done any long bike trips before, but it's something I want to start. So far, I've taken test rides of the Triumph Speed 400, Triumph Scrambler 400X, Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450, Royal Enfield Meteor 350, Honda CB350RS, TVS RTX 300, and KTM 390 Adventure. I'm confused about which one to choose. My priorities in a bike include comfort during daily city commuting, ability to handle bumpy roads well. The bike should be capable of light off-roading and it should also be comfortable for long rides. One thing that I have noticed with some bikes is that after riding for a while, my palms started hurting. I'm not sure if it's because of my riding posture or the ergonomics, but I'd prefer a bike that doesn't cause that kind of discomfort. I'm 5'8" (173 cm) tall. Based on my requirements and the bikes I've already test-ridden, which one would you recommend? Are there any other bikes in this budget that I should also consider?

Verified
4h

Since you have said you want to start riding long distances in addition to your daily commutes, buying a machine with good performance for highway rides would be a smart move. Therefore, we'd recommend choosing between the 350cc Triumph Speed 400 and Scrambler 400 X, Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450, TVS Apache RTX 300 and 350cc KTM 390 Adventure. The Guerrilla 450 and Speed 400 will offer you a traditional roadster experience wherein they are easy to manage 'standard' bikes with good performance and comfort to handle your needs. If you plan to do a lot of solo riding, these bikes make good sense. If, instead, you want space for a pillion and luggage, and the ability to simply shrug off bad roads without giving it a second thought, then the RTX and 390 Adventure are the way to go. The KTM will offer more performance and is the machine that has been around much longer but the RTX is the better rounded product of the two. In the city, these ADVs can feel a little big and cumbersome, especially at slower speeds although in time you would get used to it. They also have big windscreens which will block cooling air coming to the rider, another hindrance in our climate. Lastly, the Scrambler 400 X is a jack of all trades sort of machine wherein it is good fun to ride it both in a spirited and laidback fashion, as your mood changes and it will give you a similiar amount of comfort and space to the ADVs but will lack the weather protection. Coming to why your palms were hurting, all of these bikes have very upright riding postures so it's unlikely to have anything to do with the rider's triangle. If you are to grip the handlebar tightly and stay like that for an extended duration, you will experience this. On your next ride, pay special attention to this. Based on your needs, it would be wise to pick between the Scrambler, Speed and Guerrilla, depending on which one fits your budget and personal case the best.

Triumph Speed 400
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
TVS Apache RTX
KTM 390 Adventure
6d

I’m confused between the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro and the Tiger 900 Rally Pro (Alpine vs Desert Edition). This will be my first superbike after upgrading from a 220cc motorcycle. I’m 175 cm tall (with shoes) and have a 30-inch inseam. My primary use will be daily city commuting, weekend rides, and occasional long-distance touring across states. I also plan to travel frequently with my wife and luggage. I test-rode the Tiger 900 Rally Pro, and even with the seat at 860 mm and the rear preload at its lowest setting, I couldn’t flat-foot the bike. Only the balls of both my feet touched the ground, which made handling the bike in heavy city traffic and on uneven roads a bit intimidating. On the highway, however, it felt excellent. Given my height, riding needs, and concerns about low-speed confidence in city conditions, which model would you recommend - the Tiger 900 GT Pro or the Rally Pro? The Tiger 900 GT/GT Pro was not available for a test ride. I have no off-roading experience, nor do I plan to ride off-road. My priority is a motorcycle that can comfortably handle the worst Indian roads, including potholes and broken surfaces, while allowing me to maintain a decent pace. I want a bike that offers plush ride quality and excellent insulation from rough roads. I’m confident that the Tiger 900 Rally Pro delivers this level of comfort, but I’m not sure if the GT or GT Pro can match it. Considering my height, my usage (mostly city, highways, touring with a pillion and luggage), and the fact that I won’t be riding off-road, would the Tiger 900 GT Pro be the better choice, or is the Rally Pro still worth considering? Please help me decide which one I should go for.

Verified
5d

To begin with, of all the middleweight road-biased ADVs available, the Triumph Tiger 900 GT (or even the better-equipped Alpine edition) is one of the most complete packages when it comes to being an all-rounder. Coming to your particular query, the Tiger 900 GT will blitz through bad roads while insulating the passengers from the jolts. The lower seat height and suspension travel of the 900 GT will be perfect for you, and since you are a tarmac-biased rider, you have no need for the 900 Rally Pro. Even if you someday decide to venture off-road, the Tiger 900 GT is a very capable machine, and you don't need the higher Rally variant to begin with.We'd recommend you opt for the Alpine edition over the standard 900 GT because it comes with all the accessories that most owners end up paying more for anyway.

Triumph Tiger 900
2w

Hi, I live in Bangalore and am looking to buy a new motorcycle under 3 lakh (on-road) and would really appreciate your suggestions. I am planning to primarily use this bike for daily commuting, weekend rides, and occasional long-distance touring or adventure trips. My wife and I are both around 5'10" tall, and pillion comfort is a high priority. Since I occasionally experience back pain, a comfortable riding posture and good suspension are very important. Also, good mileage is another major deciding factor. I'm looking for a bike that offers a good balance of comfort (for both rider and pillion), reliability, fuel economy, touring capability and ability to handle occasional bad roads or light adventure riding. I'm open to any brand and would love to hear your recommendations based on personal experience. If you've owned or ridden any bike that fits these requirements, please share your thoughts, along with any pros and cons. Thanks in advance!

Verified
3h

From what you've described, it seems like the TVS Apache RTX 300 would be a good fit for your needs. The RTX is spacious, comfortable, loaded with features and has decent performance and fuel economy too. The downside here is that RTX waiting periods are on the higher side and since this is still a fairly new product, you may experience teething issues. Fully loaded with luggage and a pillion, its performance will also be quite modest. If you are open to extending your budget to account for the Royal Enfield Himalayan 450, we would strongly suggest you go down that route. The Himalayan has excellent suspension, gutsy performance and is a proven commodity today. The only real downside is it's heft and size but since you and your partner both are on the taller side, chances are, you should be able to make your peace with it or even welcome the added space on offer. Take rest rides of both machines and see which one you guys lean towards more.

TVS Apache RTX
Royal Enfield Himalayan

Expert reviews worth reading

Popular discussions right now

Posted on: 19 Feb 2026