Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

•9w

Hi everyone, I’m planning to buy a Tata Nexon and would really appreciate some advice from current Nexon owners or anyone who has recently compared these variants. My current options are the Nexon Creative AMT, which is around Rs 12.46 lakh on-road, and the Creative AMT Camo, which costs around Rs 12.90 lakh on-road. The difference is roughly Rs 44,000. I’m particularly interested in the Camo for its additional features and the Munnar Mist colour, but I’m wondering whether the extra Rs 44,000 is actually worth paying over the regular Creative AMT. My priorities are good long-term ownership, genuinely useful features rather than cosmetic additions, safety and comfort, and decent resale value. I’m also planning to keep the car for several years, and my overall budget is strictly under Rs 13 lakh on-road. So, which would be the better choice: the Creative AMT to save Rs 44,000, the Creative AMT Camo by paying the extra Rs 44,000, or skipping the Nexon and considering another manufacturer or variant under Rs 13 lakh? If buying with this budget today, which one would you choose and why? I’d also be interested in hearing from anyone who has already booked or owns the Camo, particularly regarding its unique features, 360-degree camera and dashcam functionality, and whether the Camo package feels worth the premium.

•8w

Go for the Tata Nexon Creative AMT Camo. The premium is justified by the additional features, especially the 360-degree camera with dashcam functionality, which is genuinely useful in daily driving and parking situations. Its larger 12.3-inch Harman touchscreen infotainment system is also a great addition to the feature list. The Camo package also adds a unique visual identity with the Munnar Mist colour, which helps the car stand out.

The extra Rs 44,000 you are spending does get you a fair bit of useful kit and, since you are planning on keeping the car for a long time, it’s worth spending a little extra now to keep the tech feeling fresh for longer. From a long-term ownership perspective, the Nexon remains a strong choice with its solid safety credentials and comfortable ride. However, the service experience of Tata cars can be inconsistent depending on the city and dealership, so check your dealer’s reputation before you commit.

The Creative AMT Camo strikes a good balance between value and features, making it a solid pick within your Rs 13 lakh budget.

Explore cars mentioned

Tata

Nexon

from ₹8.26 Lakh

More posts on similar cars

•1d

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a new car, with monthly usage of around 500 km in the city for office commuting and 0-1,000 km on the highway, depending on our holiday plans. We liked the new Kia Seltos HTK (Optional) and want to go for an automatic. However, we are confused about which powertrain to choose: diesel automatic, turbo-petrol DCT or naturally aspirated (NA) petrol IVT. We currently own a BS4 diesel Maruti Suzuki Swift in our hometown, so we would love a car that offers an exciting driving experience. However, we are concerned about potential DPF issues with BS6 Phase 2 diesel engines, especially with predominantly city driving. We are also worried about possible overheating issues with the turbo-petrol DCT in heavy traffic, while the NA petrol IVT did not feel particularly exciting to drive. Which powertrain would you recommend for our usage and driving preferences, given a budget of around Rs. 20 lakh? Thanks in advance!

•22h

Go for the Kia Seltos turbo petrol DCT. Your usage pattern is a mix of city commuting and occasional long highway runs, and you also want an exciting driving experience. The diesel automatic is a great engine, but with only 500 km a month in the city, you are right to be cautious about DPF issues. Modern diesels still need regular highway runs to keep the system healthy, and your usage is right on the borderline. The naturally aspirated petrol IVT is the most hassle-free option, but as you have already noticed, it is not particularly exciting to drive.The turbo petrol DCT is the best compromise. It is genuinely quick and fun to drive, and the DCT is not something to be overly worried about. Yes, dual-clutch gearboxes can get hot in heavy stop-start traffic, but the Seltos DCT is well engineered and will cope with normal city driving. The key is to drive it sensibly in traffic - avoid creeping for long periods; shift to N when at a standstill in traffic instead of keeping it in D. And use the brakes while stopped on an incline, rather than feathering the throttle. For your usage pattern, it is the most enjoyable and practical option.

Kia Seltos

•5d

Hi, I am planning to buy an EV with an on-road price within ₹20 lakhs. Can I consider the ZS EV? My daily commute is around 50-60 km, including 30-35 km of highway driving, with the rest being city driving. I need a spacious car with a good interior. I don’t like the Curvv or Windsor designs. I currently use a Nexon petrol, which I like.

•4d

The MG ZS EV is a strong fit for your requirements if it is the discounted car under Rs 20 lakh on road. Your daily 50 to 60km commute, including 30 to 35km on the highway, is well suited to an electric car, and this MG car offers a more premium cabin and a roomier feel than your current Tata Nexon petrol. Since you dislike the Tata Curvv and MG Windsor designs, there's little reason to force yourself towards either.The current ZS EV has a 50.3kWh battery and a real world range of around 340km. Its comfortable ride and conventional SUV styling make it a sensible upgrade, while the main drawback is that it is an ageing model, with a replacement reportedly expected around 2027.That could affect resale value, but the discount can help offset the risk.

If both were similarly priced, would you pick the newer Bayon or stick with the familiar Venue?

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Expert reviews worth reading

TataNexon

Read expert review

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•3d

Please advise which car would be the best choice for long-term ownership: the Mahindra Scorpio, Tata Safari, Tata Harrier, Jeep Compass, Volkswagen SUV, or any other suitable option. My priority is reliability, long-term durability, and hassle-free ownership over the next 10 years or more. I would appreciate suggestions based on real-world ownership experience, maintenance costs, spare parts availability, and after-sales support.

•3d

For long-term ownership, the Mahindra Scorpio N is the safest recommendation from your shortlist. It has a proven track record, robust mechanicals and a strong service network, making it a dependable choice for 5-10 years of ownership. The Tata Harrier and Tata Safari have improved significantly, but the Scorpio N still has the edge on long-term reliability and ownership confidence. The Jeep Compass is a good product, but it is now an ageing model and does not offer the same value proposition as the Scorpio N. If you are open to alternatives, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is worth considering. It is a more modern product with a better balance of comfort, features and refinement, and it is a strong long-term ownership proposition as well. The Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are excellent driver's cars, but they are smaller and do not offer the same level of space or road presence as the Scorpio N or XUV 7XO.

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a seven-seater car. I have test-driven the Renault Triber Turbo and Citroen Aircross X and was impressed by what both offer at their price points. However, the Aircross put a wide smile on my face. As a current Maruti Suzuki user, I did not consider the Ertiga because it feels similar to our Swift. I liked the Aircross X but am sceptical about Citroen's service network and spare parts availability. However, there are three Citroen showrooms within 45 km of my place. Please suggest which car I should choose. My budget: Rs. 15 lakh Current vehicle: Second-generation Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol (2017) Annual usage: Around 10,000 km, with a 50:30:20 split between town, highway and city driving Requirement: A seven-seater car

•6d

The Citroen's interiors feel more special, its engine is more powerful, and its ride-handling balance is outstanding; however, for seven adults, it won't be as comfortable as the Triber.In fact, the Triber's superb packaging makes it genuinely comfortable for passengers in all three rows, despite its compact sub-4-meter dimensions. The new turbo-petrol engine makes it an effortless performer, and its ride quality feels very mature too. Moreover, the Triber Turbo is also much more affordable in comparison, making it outstanding value for money. Yes, the Aircross X will appeal to your heart, but given Citroen's limited service network and cramped third row, the Triber Turbo is the more sensible choice.

Renault Triber

Citroen Aircross

•3d

I am planning to buy my first car. I want to have a 7-seater and need it for long term ownership. I liked the Citroen Aircross X design for 5+2. I am planning to choose a car with automatic transmission. I have couple of major concerns for which I would like your advice. First one is Mileage, I heard Aircross has a mileage issue and its real-world city mileage is 8 kpl while on highway it is 14 kpl. Is it the same for X version also? Second advice is for its service network. I have heard from the people that its service is slow. Regular servicing also takes around 2 days of time. I have a service center within 10 km from my home. My budget is Rs. 20 Lakh and I need an automatic transmission with rear and front parking camera or 360-degree camera since I am a new driver. Are there any 7-seater alternatives within this budget?

•2d

The Citroen Aircross X is a good-looking car, now with a premium interior. It is the only SUV in its category which offers a 5+2 seating configuration, and even though the third row is not particularly spacious, it works for occasional use. The real-world fuel efficiency figures as per our tests are 9.5kpl and 13.62kpl in city and highway conditions, respectively, which is quite decent given the strong and smooth performance this 1.2-turbo-petrol-AT delivers. What's more is that ride comfort is outstanding, perhaps the best among all midsize SUVs. So as far as comfort and practicality goes, the Aircross X is a good car.Citroen's service centre network is limited, but since you have a touchpoint close to your home, your vehicle's regular servicing and maintenance is likely to be taken care of smoothly. If you love the Aircross X for what it is, go for it - as far as value goes, it is an outstanding proposition. If you're looking for proper seven-seater alternatives, we'd strongly recommend the Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ turbo-petrol automatic version. All three rows are properly spacious, well-suited for adults. This variant will be within your Rs 20 lakh on-road budget, and it has front and rear parking sensors, as well as rear-view camera to make parking easy for you. Sure, it isn't an SUV, but it is a very sensible car, if you need a proper seven-seater.

Citroen Aircross

Kia Carens Clavis

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches