Khargone

•6h

I’m confused between the Kia Seltos HTX G1.5 NA petrol IVT and the G1.5 T-GDi turbo-petrol 7DCT. My usage will be primarily in the city, with occasional family road trips, probably once every three months. I plan to keep the car for more than 10 years. Is the G1.5 NA IVT sufficiently powerful and safe for driving hill stations like Munnar and Ooty with family on board when cruising through steep climbs & ghat roads ? Will it struggle with five people and luggage?

•55m

Go for the Kia Seltos HTX 1.5 NA petrol IVT. For your usage pattern, predominantly city driving with occasional family road trips and a planned ownership period of over 10 years, the naturally aspirated petrol paired with the CVT automatic is the more sensible choice. It is smooth, reliable and well-suited to stop-and-go traffic, and the CVT gearbox is seamless in the city and easy to live with over the long term.

On hill station drives, the 1.5 NA engine will not struggle as long as you drive sensibly. It may not feel as effortless as the turbo, especially with five people and luggage on steep climbs, but it will get the job done without drama. You may need to plan overtakes and use the manual mode on the CVT on steep sections, but it is perfectly capable for family touring.

The turbo-petrol DCT is the more powerful and exciting option, but the DCT gearbox is not as well-suited to predominantly city usage. The naturally aspirated Seltos IVT is the safer, more reliable and more stress-free choice.

Explore cars mentioned

Kia

Seltos

from ₹12.54 Lakh

•4m•

@devakirohith After driving the Seltos, I felt comfort and luxury in city traffic

More posts on similar cars

•2d

I’m 26, and we’re planning to buy a new car. We have shortlisted two options: the Hycross GX(O) 7-seater and the Seltos HTX(A) Turbo Petrol. We removed the Kushaq from the list due to concerns about spare parts availability and maintenance costs. We also ruled out the Creta, as it feels outdated compared to the Seltos, and the turbo-petrol variant is much more expensive. Around 80% of my driving will be in the city, but I want a good engine and a comfortable ride, as my parents will be travelling with me at times. Although the Hycross is lower on features and there are talks of a facelift, I don’t know why, but it still feels like something different.

•1d

Go for the Toyota Innova Hycross GX(O) 7-seater. Your usage is 80% city driving with occasional family trips, and you want a comfortable ride for your parents. The Hycross is a fundamentally different proposition from the Seltos. It is a larger, more spacious MPV with a strong focus on comfort, reliability and long-term ownership. The hybrid powertrain is well suited to city driving, offering smooth performance and better fuel efficiency in stop-and-go traffic. The ride quality is more comfortable, and the rear seat experience is significantly better for family use.The Seltos HTX(A) Turbo petrol is a good car with a strong engine and a more feature-rich cabin, but it is still a midsize SUV. It does not offer the same level of space, comfort or long-term ownership confidence as the Hycross. The turbo petrol engine is also less efficient in city driving conditions.The Hycross may feel less feature-rich, but it makes up for it with a more comfortable and dependable ownership experience. The facelift is worth noting, but the current car is already a very well-rounded package. If you are looking for something that feels different and will keep you happy for years, the Hycross is the better choice.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Kia Seltos

•4d

How exactly is the Hyundai Bayon different from Hyundai Creta?

•3d

While both are midsize SUVs, the Bayon and Creta are quite different from each other in their size, platform and positioning, and the distinction will become even clearer once the next-gen Creta is launched in early 2027. While currently both use versions of Hyundai's Global K2 platform, the Bayon's is a newer more updated version with some tech advancements. The next-gen Creta, meanwhile will move to the even-newer K3 platform used by the new Kia Seltos, and this means it will grow larger and more spacious too. In terms of powertrains, while the Creta uses naturally aspirated petrol, turbo petrol, turbo diesel and electric powertrains, it's understood that the Bayon will use only the 1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine (with MT and CVT gearboxes), and will also incorporate CNG as its alternate powertrain, but that remains to be confirmed at this stage. The Bayon is also a lower-slung design with a falling roofline for a sportier look, while the next-gen Creta is expected to get more boxy and taller. Think of the approach Maruti Suzuki took with its Fronx and Brezza in the sub-4m space. With the Venue restricted by the sub-4m length requirement, and the next-gen Creta expected to grow even larger to nearly 4.5 metres, Hyundai plans to fill the gap between the two with the Bayon, which will measure in at around 4.2 metres.

I am planning to buy a new car for myself in Bangalore, with a budget of up to Rs 25 lakh on-road. I have shortlisted two cars: the Tata Sierra Accomplished 1.5-litre turbo-petrol and the Kia Seltos 1.5-litre turbo-petrol DCT. Which one would be the better choice, especially considering family comfort, ease of driving and driving enjoyment? I am also unsure about Tata’s reliability. Is the concern around Tata cars based mainly on social media noise, or is there a genuine reliability issue? If possible, how much of a reliability risk can realistically be expected with a Tata car? I find that the Sierra meets my expectations better overall, but I am hesitant because of the concerns around Tata’s reliability and after-sales experience. I have test-driven both cars and am comfortable with both. The Mahindra XUV 7XO was also on my shortlist, but I dropped it mainly because of its larger size. Should I reconsider the XUV 7XO, particularly for Bangalore city driving and family use?

•3d

For your priorities of family comfort, easy driving and some fun, the Tata Sierra is a very strong fit. It is the roomiest SUV in this comparison, with excellent rear legroom and headroom, while its 1.5-litre turbo petrol and torque converter automatic make for smooth, effortless progress in traffic. The ride is also very good over broken roads, although the 19-inch wheels on the Accomplished do take away some of that comfort.The Kia Seltos is the more polished choice, with the best finished cabin, excellent space and strong refinement. However, the turbo DCT is not always smooth at low speeds and can fumble occasionally in traffic. That makes the Sierra's torque converter a better match if ease of driving is important. The Seltos is also more efficient, though the Sierra's 160hp engine has no shortage of performance.The Tata reliability concern should not be dismissed entirely, but neither can a percentage be put on the likelihood of a Sierra developing problems. The car is too new for meaningful long-term reliability data. The more legitimate concern is Tata's inconsistent after sales experience, which is also highlighted in the comparison. The local dealer and service centre therefore matter considerably.The Mahindra XUV 7XO can be considered, but if its size already feels excessive for Bengaluru, there is little reason to stretch to it. The Sierra gives you a genuinely spacious family cabin without moving into that larger footprint.

Kia Seltos

Tata Sierra

Mahindra XUV 3XO

View all Posts

Expert reviews worth reading

KiaSeltos

Read expert review

Popular discussions right now

•5d

Hi, I’m confused between the Skoda Kylaq and Tata Punch EV and would like some advice on which one to buy. The car will primarily be used for city driving, with occasional highway trips. The budget is Rs 10-14 lakh on-road. I previously owned a Volkswagen Polo GT TDI, so I’m looking for a car that can offer a similar level of driving satisfaction while also being practical for everyday use. I’m currently confused between these two options and would appreciate some guidance.

•5d

Go for the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI. With your budget of Rs 10-14 lakh, mostly city usage and occasional highway runs, the Kylaq is the better fit. It offers a familiar driving experience coming from a Polo GT TDI, with a punchy turbo petrol engine, solid build quality and a sorted ride and handling balance. The Tata Punch EV is a good city car, but the Kylaq is more versatile for occasional highway trips and long-term ownership. The Kylaq also offers better rear seat space and a more premium feel overall. The Punch EV makes sense only if your usage is almost entirely city-based and you have reliable home charging. Given your budget and usage pattern, the Kylaq is the more balanced and sensible choice.

Skoda Kylaq

Tata Punch EV

•6d

I currently drive a Hyundai i10 CNG, with daily running of around 6 km in Gurgaon city traffic and a monthly highway drive of around 200 km. I am now planning to upgrade my car, with an on-road budget of Rs. 12 lakh for a petrol sub-4-metre SUV, up to Rs. 14 lakh for a petrol midsize SUV, and Rs. 15 lakh for an EV. I live in a rented apartment on the second floor, so I am apprehensive about getting an EV. I prefer an EV, but installing a charger could be complicated due to the sanctioned load. My running could increase to nearly 800 km per month in the future. My key priorities are: - Good suspension and ride comfort, as I have a back problem - Decent fuel efficiency in heavy city traffic - Low to medium maintenance costs - Auto hold and ventilated seats would be good to have I sometimes consider buying a manual, but I mostly prefer an automatic. I am currently considering the Maruti Brezza, Baleno AMT, Fronx AMT/AT, Sonet iMT, Exter AMT, and even the upcoming Inster, VF3, and Bayon. I am open to other suggestions as well. Note: I had a bad driving experience with the Punch AMT, as it caused back fatigue.

•5d

Given your priorities of ride comfort, fuel efficiency and low maintenance, the Maruti Brezza automatic is the most sensible upgrade. It offers a comfortable ride, a proven naturally aspirated petrol engine and Maruti's strong service network, which keeps long-term ownership costs in check. The torque converter automatic is smooth in city traffic, and the Brezza's higher seating position will help with your back issues. The Sonet iMT is not the right choice here. While it is a good car, the iMT is not a true automatic and will not offer the same ease of use in Gurgaon traffic. The Baleno AMT and Exter AMT are also not ideal given your back issues and the fact that AMT gearboxes are not as smooth as torque converter automatics in stop-start conditions.On the EV front, your apprehension about charging is valid. Without a straightforward home charging solution, an EV will add unnecessary complexity to your ownership experience. The upcoming Bayon is interesting and if you can wait a few weeks you would have a better picture before making a decision. For now, the Brezza automatic strikes the best balance between comfort, efficiency and hassle-free ownership.

Hi, I want to buy my last car as I am 66 years old. I have been driving a Honda City for the last 12 years without any major hiccup. The Honda City engine and its reliability is excellent although its ground clearance is an issue. I have looked at Elevate and given its ground clearance as an SUV, I am impressed although the issues on E20 and abrupt blending issues are surely technical issues. Windsor EV was a great test drive but all controls on screen could be a bottleneck for me at my age and am planning to move to an automatic. Please recommend as experts. My monthly running will not be more than 500 km. Should I also look at Seltos. I will appreciate a feedback from experts. I want a reliable, easy to drive car with low maintenance cost and good family value with. There won't be any great pick ups or many highway drives will not be there.

•3d

Given your 12 years of trouble free City ownership, the Elevate is the most natural replacement. It retains Honda’s simple 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine, adds substantially better ground clearance and gives you the easier ingress and SUV driving position you liked. The CVT is also very well suited to your low speed, low running usage and should make the transition to an automatic easy.On your E20 concern, we would not treat it as a reason to avoid the Elevate. Honda says all its cars manufactured in India since January 2009 are E20 material compatible, and the current Elevate is officially certified for E20. Honda also says E20 should not cause durability concerns or require any component changes. There can be a marginal reduction in fuel economy because ethanol contains less energy than petrol, but with your 500km monthly running, that is unlikely to be significant.The Seltos is worth a look, particularly if you want a more feature rich and premium cabin, but given your priorities of reliability, easy driving, low maintenance and long term ownership, the Elevate fits your requirements more naturally. The Windsor EV is also an interesting option, but at just 500km a month, there is little financial reason to move to an EV, especially when you have concerns about its touchscreen heavy interface.

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches