Autocar India
•23w

Hi Team. I am planning to buy a new SUV, and I took a test drive of the Tata Sierra and MG Hector. I loved the MG Hector, and the feel is great. I know there is a concern around mileage, but it is okay for me as my driving is not much. Please suggest if I can go ahead with the Hector or if I should consider some other option.

Verified
•23w
The MG Hector is a good choice if you’re happy with the way it drives and feels. It’s a size up from the Sierra and offers a wider, more accommodating rear seat. In fact, Hector’s back seat is among the most comfortable in its class. It’s easy to get in and out of, and the soft ride only adds to the sense of comfort. The boot is larger than the Sierra’s too, with a generous 587 litres of space.
The Tata Sierra is a good option as well and is nicer to drive, but it is a bit more expensive and not as spacious as the Hector. Yes, the Hector does have a reputation for being a bit of a gas guzzler, but, as you mentioned, since you don’t drive much, it shouldn’t hit your pocket too hard.
MG Hector

MG Hector

Explore cars mentioned

MG Hector

MG

Hector

from ₹14.15 Lakh

Tata Sierra

Tata

Sierra

from ₹13.56 Lakh

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

•21w

Tata sierra cresta and MG hector which are best to buy Please suggest It will be great help to buy Thnx

Compare suggested cars

More questions on similar cars

•3d

Hi, I currently own a March 2023 MG Hector Sharp CVT Petrol, top-end variant. The car is performing well except for the mileage, which is as low as 5 kpl. Would it be a good idea to sell the car and buy a used Skoda Kodiaq? If yes, I would like to hear your recommendations. Currently, I am being offered only Rs. 13 lakh for my car.

Verified
•1d

The MG Hector petrol CVT is a comfortable and feature-rich SUV, but its fuel efficiency is a known weakness, especially in city driving. However, switching to a used Skoda Kodiaq is unlikely to solve your mileage concerns. The Kodiaq is a larger, heavier SUV with a 2.0 TSI turbo petrol engine, and while it is more powerful and engaging to drive, it is not significantly more fuel efficient in real-world conditions. In fact, depending on your driving style and usage, it could even be thirstier than the Hector.The bigger issue here is the financial hit. Rs. 13 lakh offer on a 2023 top-end Hector is a steep depreciation, and moving to a used Kodiaq will likely require a substantial additional outlay. Unless you are genuinely unhappy with the Hector beyond just fuel efficiency, it is not a financially sensible move.If mileage is your primary concern, the better approach is to adjust your expectations or driving habits, or consider a hybrid or diesel SUV in your next purchase cycle. The Hector remains a comfortable and well-equipped SUV, and it is worth holding on to unless there is a stronger reason to change.

VehicleMG Hector
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq
•4d

What is the real-world mileage of the Tata Sierra NA engine? Is it a good choice? I am okay with its linear power delivery because I am used to it. I want a safe family car, decent mileage, and good road presence. I am confused between the Smart Plus Sierra and Kia Seltos HTK.

Verified
•2d

The Tata Sierra 1.5 NA is quite a heavy car and, despite being tuned for efficiency, that weight does affect fuel consumption. In real-world conditions, you can expect Sierra mileage to fall between 7 and 9 kpl in the city and about 12 and 14 kpl on the highway, depending on how and where you drive.The bigger issue is performance. The 1.5 NA engine feels very sluggish, and you will need to work the engine and gearbox hard, especially when overtaking or when you need a quick burst of speed in traffic.Where this Tata car scores strongly is in road presence, safety, and overall family appeal. It feels solid, has a commanding stance, and is well suited for comfortable, relaxed driving.The Kia Seltos HTK, on the other hand, is the easier car to live with day to day. Its 1.5 NA engine feels noticeably far more responsive and lighter on its feet, and it is also more fuel-efficient in real-world use.So, if your priority is a safe, solid family car with strong road presence and you’re okay with the poor performance and lower mileage, the Sierra works. But if you want better drivability, efficiency, and a more effortless experience behind the wheel, the Seltos is the more rounded choice.

VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleKia Seltos
•6d

I am planning to buy the Hyundai Alcazar Prestige 7-Seater Manual Petrol variant. We are a family of four, so most of the time, only five seats will be occupied. However, we occasionally travel in groups consisting of 4 adults, 3 older kids, and luggage, which is why I am considering the 7-seater option. Currently, I drive a 2019 Hyundai Santro Sportz, and my annual running is unlikely to exceed 10,000 km. We have test-driven the Tata Sierra, Kia Carens Clavis, and Kia Seltos, but the Alcazar felt better in terms of overall seating comfort, especially with older kids seated in the third row. Given my usage pattern and requirements, do you think the Alcazar Prestige 7-Seater Petrol Manual is a good choice? I am also open to considering other options in a similar price range if there are better alternatives. Any advice or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Verified
•1d

Based on your usage, the Hyundai Alcazar Prestige 7-seater petrol manual is a sensible choice. Your annual running is under 10,000km, so petrol is the right fuel, and the manual gearbox keeps costs down. The third row is one of the more usable options in this Hyundai car, especially for older kids on occasional trips, and the overall comfort and refinement are strong points. However, do keep in mind that with all three rows in use, boot space is very limited, so you will need to plan luggage carefully or consider a roof box for longer trips.Given your requirement of occasional 7-seat use with older kids, the Kia Carens Clavis is worth a second look. It offers a more spacious third row and better luggage flexibility, making it a more practical 7-seater overall. The Alcazar feels more premium and better finished, but the Carens Clavis is the more functional family car. The Tata Sierra is a good product, but it does not offer a third row at all. If you want even more third row and luggage space, consider moving up to a Tata Safari, which offers both. However, that will entail a price jump, so you will likely have to up your budget for that. All things considered, the Carens Clavis is the more practical choice, but if you're happy with the space in the Alcazar, you should go for it.

VehicleHyundai Alcazar
VehicleKia Carens Clavis
VehicleTata Safari
VehicleTata Sierra

View all Posts

Expert reviews worth reading

MG Hector
MGHector
Read expert review
Tata Sierra
TataSierra
Read expert review

Popular discussions right now

•6d

I am confused between the Toyota Innova Crysta and the Mahindra XUV 7XO. I am looking for a comfortable 7-seater with good luggage space and a premium interior, including a high-quality music system. My usage will be mostly on highways, with occasional city driving. Which one would you recommend?

Verified
•5d

Go for the Toyota Innova Crysta. Your usage is highway-heavy with occasional city runs, and you want a proper 7-seater with good luggage space and a premium feel. The Crysta is still the benchmark for this kind of requirement. It is genuinely spacious in all three rows, has a large and usable boot even with all seats up, and is built for long-distance comfort and reliability. The diesel engine is strong, refined and well-suited to highway cruising, and Toyota’s ownership experience and long-term reliability are hard to beat. The Mahindra XUV 7XO is the more modern product with a more premium-looking interior and a better sound system, but it does not match the Crysta for outright space, practicality or long-term peace of mind. If your priority is a proper 7-seater that will serve you well for years, the Crysta is the safer and more sensible choice. If you want a more premium cabin and a richer feature set, the XUV 7XO is the alternative, but it is not as practical as the Crysta.

VehicleToyota Innova Crysta
VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
•3d

Hi, I am a teacher and a first-time female driver with a budget of Rs. 11.5 lakh. I am looking for an automatic car that I plan to keep for the next 15 years, but I am confused about whether to buy a petrol AMT, CNG AMT, or an EV due to the uncertainty surrounding ethanol blending. My daily commute is 46 km, of which 22 km is on the highway, 18 km is on normal roads, and 6 km is on bumpy village roads in poor condition. Please recommend the most suitable fuel type that will keep my overall cost of ownership low.

Verified
•3d

We'd recommend a petrol automatic. With a daily running of around 46km and an ownership period of 15 years, it offers the best balance of low ownership costs, reliability and ease of use for a first-time driver.We wouldn't let E20 fuel influence your decision. Modern E20-compliant petrol cars are designed to run on it, and there is no official roadmap beyond E20. It isn't a reason to avoid buying a petrol car today. A CNG automatic will certainly reduce your fuel bills, but the higher purchase price, reduced boot space and limited automatic options make CNG car less attractive unless fuel savings are your overriding priority. An electric car will have the lowest running costs, but at your budget, you'll have to compromise on size or features, and recovering the higher upfront cost will take time.Given your budget and usage, we'd look at the Maruti Suzuki Brezza facelift automatic which will launch soon if you can stretch slightly, or the Maruti Suzuki Fronx Delta+ AGS if you want to stay within budget. Both are easy to drive, have good ground clearance for the 6km of rough village roads and come backed by Maruti Suzuki's extensive service network. If you prefer a smoother automatic, the Hyundai Exter SX AMT is also worth considering.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleHyundai Exter
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
•4d

Hi, I am confused about which car to buy within a budget of Rs. 8-9 lakh (on-road). This will be my first car, and my daily running is around 50 km, with an occasional 1,000 km round trip. Kindly suggest the best car in this budget with good fuel efficiency, reliability, safety, and comfort.

Verified
•4d

For your first car with a daily 50km commute and occasional long trips, the Maruti Suzuki Swift ZXI is the most sensible choice. It is fuel efficient, reliable and compact enough for daily use, while also being comfortable enough for longer journeys. The Swift’s naturally aspirated petrol engine is reliable and easy to live with, and Maruti’s service network and low maintenance costs make ownership straightforward. Safety is adequate for the segment, and the Maruti Suzuki car offers a good balance of ride comfort and practicality. If you prefer a slightly higher driving position, the Maruti Suzuki Fronx with the 1.2-litre petrol engine is worth considering.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift

View all Posts

Posted on: 14 Feb 2026