Autocar India
KU

Kumar

21w

Hi, I want to change my 8-year-old BMW X5 and pick up a Lexus RX 350 hybrid. I will be doing mostly city driving. Please advise.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
7w

Yes, considering your driving is in the city, the Lexus RX 350h is a good option. Its strong hybrid powertrain is incredibly efficient, which will bring down your running costs considerably compared to the BMW. Also, service and maintenance costs will be lower, too. 

It's also very luxuriously appointed and well equipped, with a uniquely Japanese take on exterior and interior design. Do note, however, that it is slightly less spacious than the BMW X5. Especially if you intend to carry three passengers in the rear seat frequently. Though the chassis is able enough, the four-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol-hybrid powertrain is nowhere near as strong or exciting as the 6-cylinder petrol and diesel engines that power the BMW X5.

Lexus RX

Lexus RX

NI

Nishar

7w

Hi, Autocar India, I am planning to buy a car within 1.5 Cr, what are the options available? Including good after sales service.

More questions on similar cars

RA

Ram

1d

Which is the best seven-seater car in the ₹15 lakh bracket? My usage is occasional long drives and limited city usage.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
13m

With occasional highway trips, limited city use, and a cap of around ₹15 lakh, the Kia Carens Clavis HTE EX 1.5 NA manual fits your needs best. It is a true seven-seater that is easy to live with and stays within budget.Why it works for you: the petrol engine is smooth and quiet, and the light steering makes it simple to handle in the city. The middle row is roomy and comfortable, and roof vents help keep the cabin cool for everyone on hot days. Even the third row of this Kia car is surprisingly comfortable for adults.Know the trade-off: With all seven occupants on board and luggage, you will need to plan overtakes on the highway. Also, the boot space with all three rows up is just 216 litres, so for longer trips, you may need to fold the last row.If you don’t plan on using the third row often, then the Maruti Ertiga or Toyota Rumion are reliable picks. Maruti also has the largest dealer network if that is a concern for you.Overall, for your use and budget, the Carens Clavis lines up best.

VehicleKia Carens Clavis
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Ertiga
VehicleToyota Rumion
SN

satya narayana

5h

I am confused between the XEV 9S and Harrier EV base models. Which one will be better for both city and highway driving?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
43m

The base Mahindra XEV 9S gets a 59kWh battery, with a 231hp/380Nm rear motor, and its claimed range is 521km. The entry-level Harrier EV on the other hand gets a 65kWh battery, with a 238hp/315Nm rear motor, and its claimed range is 538km. Even though their specifications are similar, the Mahindra car is Rs 1.5 lakh more affordable. For the money, the XEV 9S also gets you a premium kit like a dedicated passenger (third) touchscreen and panoramic sunroof, among others. Additionally, the XEV 9S has a lighter steering and a tighter turning radius, which makes manoeuvring the car much easier in the city. Additionally, the extra row of seats can come handy occasionally. Overall, the Mahindra XEV 9S comes across as the better pick of the two.

VehicleMahindra XEV 9S
VehicleTata Harrier EV
KN

Kumaravelu N

3h

I have been driving a Volkswagen Vento 1.2 TSI DSG for the past 7 years. It is a true driver’s car and feels very safe. However, my only concern is the high maintenance and spare parts cost. I am planning to move to a compact SUV. Please suggest a similar automatic car under ₹15 lakh with lower maintenance costs.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

With a budget of ₹15 lakh, consider the Skoda Kushaq Classic+ 1.0-litre turbo-petrol mated to the new 8-speed automatic transmission. With this Skoda car, you'll get a similar solid and secure feel, as well as confident driving manners, similar to your outgoing Vento. The turbo-petrol is peppy, and the smooth 8-speed torque converter complements it nicely. Also, compared to the sub-4-meter cars you'll otherwise get at this price, the Kushaq Classic+ will give you more cabin and boot space, which as a Vento owner, you might appreciate. With heavier localisation, Skoda's maintenance costs have reduced over time, so ownership cost is likely to be lower.If you're keen on getting a sub-4-meter compact SUV, consider the Skoda Kylaq and Hyundai Venue, both of which are enjoyable to drive (although the Kylaq has an edge), and should be easy on your pocket too.

VehicleSkoda Kushaq
VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleHyundai Venue

Popular discussions right now

KY

Krishna Yadav

4d

I am planning to sell my Mahindra XUV700 and switch to the Renault Duster. I would like your expert opinion on whether this would be a good decision.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

On paper and in real-world ownership, these are very different cars, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO sits in a clear segment above. The XUV 700 is a bigger, more complete SUV. It offers more space, better road presence, stronger performance and a far richer overall experience, including the option of a third row and a more premium cabin. It is designed as a proper family SUV and feels more capable on highways and long drives.The Renault Duster, even in its new form, is a simpler, more driver-focused and lighter SUV. It will likely be easier to drive in the city and feel more rugged and straightforward, but it is still a step down in terms of overall size, features and cabin experience.So the decision really comes down to intent. If you are moving because you want something more compact, easier to use daily and less feature-heavy, then the Duster can make sense. But if you are expecting it to feel like an upgrade or even equal to the XUV700 in terms of space, comfort and overall experience, it will not.

VehicleRenault Duster
DE

Devakumar

5d

I have booked the Tata Sierra Adventure Plus petrol manual, but I am now confused between the petrol and diesel manual variants, particularly in terms of mileage and performance. I am not interested in an automatic transmission. My annual running is less than 6,000 km. Could you please advise which engine option would be more suitable for my usage? Additionally, I would appreciate any alternative suggestions for a spacious car with good mileage that fits my needs.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

The Tata Sierra is a big, heavy car, and the petrol engine, being a naturally aspirated unit, feels just about adequate, especially once you load it up or hit the highway. The diesel, on the other hand, suits the car far better with its stronger low-end pull, making overtakes easier and long-distance driving far more relaxed.That said, with your low annual running of under 6000 km, the petrol still makes sense if your usage is mostly in the city. It will feel smoother, easier to live with and perfectly adequate for everyday driving, even if it lacks that effortless punch on highways.If you are open to alternatives for a better petrol manual experience, the Renault Duster with its turbo petrol engine is a strong option. It feels far more effortless to drive, while naturally aspirated options like the Kia Seltos or Hyundai Creta offer a more refined and effortless experience than the Sierra petrol.

VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHyundai Creta
RO

Rohin

1w

I am confused about buying the AMT version of the Skoda Kylaq, Tata Nexon, or Maruti Fronx. My budget is between 11 and 13 lakh. My usage is mostly city driving of about 1,000 km per month, with occasional long highway drives.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

Between the three, the Skoda Kylaq is the best automatic for the money. It doesn’t use an AMT but a proper 6‑speed torque-converter with the 1.0 TSI, which is smooth, robust and easily the nicest for your occasional highway runs.The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo also gets the same 6‑speed torque-converter auto, and while it is refined and efficient, it doesn’t have the same solid, European feel or driving dynamics as the Kylaq. However, from an overall cost-of-ownership point of view - price, fuel efficiency and service, the Fronx is likely to work out cheaper.The Tata Nexon in your budget doesn’t get a torque-converter. You mainly have a 6‑speed AMT, which is convenient but nowhere near as smooth or quick as a proper automatic. There is also a 7‑speed DCA dual‑clutch option, which is noticeably better than the AMT, but still not as seamless as the autos in the Kylaq and Fronx, and it can push the price higher.For 11-13 lakh, 1,000km a month in the city and the odd long drive, we would pick the Kylaq auto. If budget discipline and running costs are top priority, go for the Fronx 1.0 turbo automatic.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleTata Nexon

Posted on: 1 Mar 2026