Autocar India
AH

Altaf Hussain

2h

I am planning to buy a new CNG variant for family use, and my first choice is the Ertiga. Could you please suggest which variant would be better between the ZXi(O) and VXi(O)? Also, are there any other good options available within a budget of up to Rs. 13 lakh?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3m

Between the two variants, the ZXI(O) CNG is the one to go for if the budget allows. Over the VXI(O), it adds alloy wheels, automatic climate control, a larger touchscreen infotainment system with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, push-button start, cruise control and a few additional convenience features. These upgrades make the cabin feel noticeably more premium and improve everyday usability, especially on long family trips.

The VXI(O) CNG covers the essentials and remains the value-for-money option. It gets the same spacious cabin, CNG powertrain and practicality that make the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga such a strong family car. However, it does feel more basic inside and misses some of the convenience features that buyers tend to appreciate over long-term ownership.

As for alternatives, there are few cars that can match the Ertiga's overall package at this price. The Maruti XL6 is the more premium version of the Ertiga, but it will stretch your Rs 13 lakh budget.

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga

More questions on similar cars

AN

Ankit

1d

Hi team, my budget is 12-13 lakh maximum for an automatic car, so it is easy to drive for both my wife and me in Hyderabad city traffic. I am a first-time car buyer and am feeling quite confused. My requirements are: good mileage, petrol engine, good boot space, rear-view camera, hill assist, and recent interiors. Kindly help.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

Consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo-petrol automatic in Zeta trim. In Hyderabad traffic, it is easy to drive, the steering is light, the automatic keeps stop-and-go stress low, and you get hill-hold and a clear rear camera that makes ramps and tight parking simple. It is a turbo-petrol and returns good mileage for daily use – expect roughly 10-11kpl in the city and 16kpl on the highway. The 308-litre boot takes airport bags and weekly shopping without fuss, and the cabin is well built and comfortable. Ground clearance is higher than that of a hatchback, so speed breakers and broken patches are less of a worry.Your budget should cover the Zeta automatic in Hyderabad, but if it feels like a stretch, the Fronx is also available with a naturally aspirated 1.2-litre engine and an AMT. This combo won’t have the highway performance of the turbo-petrol and the AMT shifts with a slight pause between gears, so it won’t be as seamless as the turbo's torque-converter automatic. However, it will deliver higher mileage, in the region of 13-14kpl in the city and 18kpl-plus on the highway.For a first-time buyer, Maruti’s reliability and stellar service network make the most sense. However, if you want an alternative, the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 turbo-petrol automatic is also a good choice. It has a more SUV-like presence, and the cabin feels more premium, but the boot is a bit smaller, and efficiency won’t be as good as the Fronx’s.Overall, the Fronx fits your needs best.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO

Expert reviews worth reading

Popular discussions right now

SP

Saransh Parnami

4d

I am confused between the Nexon, XUV 3XO, and Venue as my first car. My running is expected to be 1,000-1,200 km per month. My priorities are: 1) Performance, 2) Mileage and ownership cost, 3) Features, and 4) Rear-seat and boot space. Please advise and suggest the best-value variant as well. I am inclined towards a manual.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Our first recommendation would be the new Venue Turbo Petrol Manual. It strikes the best balance for your priorities. The turbo petrol engine is punchy and enjoyable to drive, fuel efficiency is respectable, and Hyundai's ownership experience is generally hassle-free. The latest Hyundai Venue is also more spacious than before, particularly in the rear seat, and feels like a very well-rounded first car. For value, we would look at the SX Turbo Manual, which gets a good mix of features without stretching the budget too much.Our second choice would be the Mahindra XUV 3XO. If outright performance and rear seat space are your priorities, it is arguably the strongest car here. The turbo petrol engine is lively, the rear bench is among the widest in the segment, and it feels more substantial than the Venue. The downside is that fuel efficiency is not as strong, and the boot is one of the smallest in the class. The MX2 Pro or AX5 Manual would be the variants to consider, depending on your budget.The Tata Nexon would be our third choice. It remains a good all-round package with decent space, a strong feature list and good road presence. However, compared to the newer Venue and 3XO, it does not feel quite as polished, and neither the driving experience nor the ownership proposition is as compelling.

VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleTata Nexon
AD

Abhishek Das

4d

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 9 Jun 2026