I want to buy both Mahindra Thar 3-door and a Kia Seltos. I am considering the base variants of both vehicles. The Thar will be used mainly for leisure, while the Seltos will be used primarily for city driving. In that case, would the petrol variant of the Seltos be a good choice? Also, I am looking at the base variant of the Thar, which is priced at around Rs. 9.99 lakh ex-showroom. Would this combination make sense for my requirements?

Autocar India

•2d

Pick the Maruti Suzuki Jimny. For Spiti’s narrow, broken mountain roads with light to moderate snow, the Jimny’s small size and low weight make life easier. It is simpler to place on those cliff-edge tracks, its narrow tyres bite better on packed snow, and visibility is excellent. The 4x4 with low range works cleanly, and Maruti’s service reach in Himachal is wider if you do need help.Be ready for one compromise. The 1.5 petrol loses power at high altitude, so climbs will be slow and you will use lower gears more often. Cabin and boot are smaller too.If you regularly travel with four adults plus big luggage, or you expect fresh, deeper snow, the Thar’s extra torque and higher clearance give you more headroom. But for a typical winter, Spiti run in light to moderate snow where control and confidence matter more than brute force, the Jimny is the better tool.

Maruti Suzuki Jimny

Mahindra Thar

Autocar India

•1h

If your priority is a combination of driving enjoyment and passenger comfort, we would lean towards the Duster 1.3 Turbo DCT.The new Renault Duster has a more absorbent suspension setup and simply feels more comfortable over broken roads. It has that traditional Duster trait of shrugging off bad surfaces without unsettling passengers, which makes it particularly enjoyable on long drives. The wet clutch DCT is another advantage, especially in Indian conditions, as it feels smoother and more natural in traffic than the dry clutch DCT used in the Seltos.The Kia Seltos 1.5 Turbo Petrol is the quicker and more polished-feeling car. The engine is strong, the cabin feels more premium and feature-rich, and overall refinement is excellent. It is also a very comfortable SUV, but its suspension is tuned more towards ride comfort than driving thrill.So if the emphasis is on ride quality, comfort and an engaging driving experience, the Duster gets our vote. The only real drawback is that the rear seat is not as spacious as the Seltos, which remains the better choice if rear passenger room and cabin premiumness are higher priorities.

Renault Duster

Kia Seltos

Autocar India

•19h

With a 40km daily commute, fuel efficiency, refinement and ease of ownership become more important than outright performance. The naturally aspirated 1.5-litre petrol in the Kia Seltos is smoother in stop-start traffic, easier to drive and should return better real-world fuel economy than the Duster's 1.3-litre turbo-petrol.The Renault Duster's strengths lie elsewhere. It feels tougher, rides better on poor roads and has a more robust SUV character. The 1.3 turbo-petrol also delivers noticeably stronger mid-range performance, making it the more enjoyable car on highways. However, turbo-petrol engines generally reward a lighter right foot and tend to consume more fuel when driven enthusiastically.For weekend family trips, the Seltos also scores highly with its spacious cabin, feature-rich interior and overall refinement. The HTX trim offers a strong equipment list without stretching the budget, and the Seltos remains one of the most rounded family SUVs in the segment.

Kia Seltos

Renault Duster