Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

•15w

I am confused between the Kia Seltos and the Maruti Suzuki Victoris. I am also unsure whether I should buy the base variant and customise it or choose a mid variant with the necessary features. I live in Chennai and drive around 1,000 km a month, with a 50:50 split between highway and city use. I like the Seltos for its design, interior and premium feel, but the Victoris seems to offer better fuel efficiency. Please suggest.

•15w

Pick the Kia Seltos mid variant. With half your running on highways, the Seltos feels calmer at speed, gives you more confidence, packs in more performance, and, as you mentioned, the cabin is more premium. At 1,000 km a month, the Victoris' better mileage likely saves only around Rs. 1,000-2,000 monthly, so the nicer drive and cabin may be worth more.

Go mid variant rather than base-plus-accessories. Safety and basic features like a proper touchscreen with Android Auto, rear camera, cruise control and more come integrated, work reliably, and stay within the standard warranty. Aftermarket bits rarely work as well, and you cannot add some safety features later.

If your main priority is fuel efficiency, the Maruti Suzuki Victoris will help keep costs low. Just know it is not as quick for highway overtakes and does not feel as rich inside. For your city-highway split, the Seltos mid variant is the sweeter long-term pick.

Explore cars mentioned

Kia

Seltos

from ₹12.76 Lakh

Maruti Suzuki

Victoris

from ₹12.18 Lakh

•15w•

@autocar.india Please suggest between diesel or petrol variant of seltos, as on the highway I like the torque generated by diesel. We also have the turbo petrol option but that comes with mileage as a sacrifice. Please advise.

•15w•

@raghuleswaran As per your usage, 1000 km per month and 50-50 between highway and city, petrol Seltos is a sensible pick for you, diesel won't recover its extra cost. Turbo petrol adds performance, no doubt, but cuts mileage. A mid-variant petrol will be the best choice for you.

•15w•

@raghuleswaran Go for Seltos because it has luxurious feeling and good for overtaking

More posts on similar cars

•1w

Hello Autocar Team, I’m planning to buy a Tata Sierra diesel and would really value your advice. I’ll be driving mostly in Hyderabad, with city traffic accounting for the majority of my usage and occasional highway trips. Could you please help me with a few questions? 1. Is the Tata Sierra a good buy right now? How is it performing in the market, and has it been a sales success or a flop? 2. What is its real-world diesel mileage in city traffic and on highways, based on your tests? 3. How are its build quality, reliability, and long-term ownership prospects? 4. How good are Tata’s service network, spare parts availability, and running costs, especially in Hyderabad? 5. Given my annual running of around 12,000-15,000km, is the diesel worth the premium, or would the petrol version make more sense? 6. How does it compare with rivals such as the Hyundai Creta, Kia Seltos, and Mahindra XUV700 for my usage? Thank you for your time. I look forward to your guidance.

•5d

Given your usage of 12,000-15,000 km a year, the Tata Sierra diesel makes sense. It is certainly worth the premium over the turbo-petrol version due to its real-world fuel efficiency advantage. In our tests, the diesel-automatic version returned 11.5kpl in the city and 14.5kpl on the highway, but with smoother-flowing traffic, you could extract even better efficiency; the diesel-manual is likely to deliver even better numbers.To answer the second part of your question, this Tata car is well accepted by the market, and it is Tata's third-best-seller (after Nexon and Punch), even outselling the Tata Tiago hatchback in some months.The Sierra is a solidly built SUV, and Tata has made improvements in reliability over the past few years. That said, owners have report some niggling issues, and Tata's service experience isn't consistent and it can be a hit-or-miss. The engine however seems largely reliable, and mechanically, it seems sound.The Sierra stands out for its impressive road presence, excellent ride comfort, and spacious cabin and large boot, making it a better family car than the Hyundai Creta or Kia Seltos. Its engine refinement isn't as good as its Korean rival, and it still lacks their finesse. The Mahindra XUV 7XO belongs to a segment above - it is larger in size, pricier, and its diesel engine is far more refined, punchier and overall it feels like a more sophisticated SUV. If the Sierra diesel has bowled you over, go for it - it is a good car. But if you can stretch your budget, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is the better buy.

Hi, The Kia Seltos hybrid's price has reportedly been leaked. I am wondering whether I should wait and pay a premium for the hybrid version. My monthly running is around 500 km. Earlier, I was planning to buy the GTX (A) variant at an on-road price of Rs. 23.5 lakh. Would it make sense to wait for the hybrid, considering my usage?

•5d

The hybrid will be best suited to buyers with significantly higher running, where the fuel savings are more meaningful. With a monthly running of just 500 km, the Seltos Hybrid will not make financial sense. At that usage, the fuel savings from the hybrid system will take a very long time to recover the higher upfront cost. The Seltos turbo petrol is already a very well-rounded package with strong performance and a good feature set. Hence, we'd recommend going ahead with the turbo petrol version - it is the smarter and more sensible choice for your needs.

Kia Seltos

•6d

Should I consider the Seltos GTX A hybrid instead of the GTX A DCT, given my monthly running of 500km and concerns about mileage? The GTX A DCT costs around Rs. 23.50 lakh.

•5d

With a monthly running of just 500km, the Seltos Hybrid is unlikely to make financial sense. The hybrid system will certainly improve fuel efficiency, but the savings at your usage level will be marginal and will take a very long time to offset the higher purchase price. The GTX+ DCT you were already considering remains the better choice for your needs. It offers strong performance, a premium feature set and a genuinely enjoyable driving experience without the added complexity and cost of a hybrid system.As for pricing, while there is no official figure yet, you can reasonably expect the Seltos Hybrid to carry a premium of at least Rs 1.5-2 lakh over the equivalent petrol DCT variant. That premium is difficult to justify at your running.The only reason to wait for the hybrid would be if you are particularly keen on the technology or want the absolute best possible fuel efficiency from your Seltos. Otherwise, the GTX+ DCT is the right car for your usage.

Kia Seltos

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Expert reviews worth reading

KiaSeltos

Read expert review

Maruti SuzukiVictoris

Read expert review

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•1w

I want a foreign-made SUV. I currently own an Elevate and now, I want another one. Can you guide me whether I should go with Skoda Kushaq, Hyundai Creta or Volkswagen Taigun?

•1w

Since you already own a Honda Elevate and are looking for a foreign-made SUV, the decision really comes down to what you want from your second car. The Skoda Kushaq and Volkswagen Taigun are essentially the same car underneath, so the choice between them is more about brand preference and dealership experience. Both are excellent to drive, with strong turbo petrol engines and a more engaging driving experience than the Creta. The Kushaq tends to offer slightly better value for money, while the Taigun has a marginally more premium interior feel.The Hyundai Creta, on the other hand, is the safer, more rounded choice. It is more comfortable, has a wider service network and is generally easier to live with over the long term. It may not be as engaging to drive as the Skoda or Volkswagen, but it is the more sensible ownership proposition.If you are looking for a car that feels different from your Elevate and enjoy driving, go for the Skoda Kushaq. If you want a hassle-free ownership experience, the Hyundai Creta is the better choice.

Please advise which car would be the best choice for long-term ownership: the Mahindra Scorpio, Tata Safari, Tata Harrier, Jeep Compass, Volkswagen SUV, or any other suitable option. My priority is reliability, long-term durability, and hassle-free ownership over the next 10 years or more. I would appreciate suggestions based on real-world ownership experience, maintenance costs, spare parts availability, and after-sales support.

•3d

For long-term ownership, the Mahindra Scorpio N is the safest recommendation from your shortlist. It has a proven track record, robust mechanicals and a strong service network, making it a dependable choice for 5-10 years of ownership. The Tata Harrier and Tata Safari have improved significantly, but the Scorpio N still has the edge on long-term reliability and ownership confidence. The Jeep Compass is a good product, but it is now an ageing model and does not offer the same value proposition as the Scorpio N. If you are open to alternatives, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is worth considering. It is a more modern product with a better balance of comfort, features and refinement, and it is a strong long-term ownership proposition as well. The Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are excellent driver's cars, but they are smaller and do not offer the same level of space or road presence as the Scorpio N or XUV 7XO.

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a seven-seater car. I have test-driven the Renault Triber Turbo and Citroen Aircross X and was impressed by what both offer at their price points. However, the Aircross put a wide smile on my face. As a current Maruti Suzuki user, I did not consider the Ertiga because it feels similar to our Swift. I liked the Aircross X but am sceptical about Citroen's service network and spare parts availability. However, there are three Citroen showrooms within 45 km of my place. Please suggest which car I should choose. My budget: Rs. 15 lakh Current vehicle: Second-generation Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol (2017) Annual usage: Around 10,000 km, with a 50:30:20 split between town, highway and city driving Requirement: A seven-seater car

•6d

The Citroen's interiors feel more special, its engine is more powerful, and its ride-handling balance is outstanding; however, for seven adults, it won't be as comfortable as the Triber.In fact, the Triber's superb packaging makes it genuinely comfortable for passengers in all three rows, despite its compact sub-4-meter dimensions. The new turbo-petrol engine makes it an effortless performer, and its ride quality feels very mature too. Moreover, the Triber Turbo is also much more affordable in comparison, making it outstanding value for money. Yes, the Aircross X will appeal to your heart, but given Citroen's limited service network and cramped third row, the Triber Turbo is the more sensible choice.

Renault Triber

Citroen Aircross

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches