Autocar India
AT

Atik

20w

I am confused between the XUV700 AXL PET AT (old generation) and the new-gen 7XO AX7 P AT. I’m getting a decent discount on the AX7 L, and the facelift doesn’t seem appealing to me based on my test drive. Is it a wise decision to consider the old-gen top trim compared to the new-gen top 3rd trim? Please advise.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
19w

Besides fewer features, one of the biggest downsides of buying a Mahindra XUV 700 over the XUV 7XO would be the resale value down the line - the latter will command a stronger price. However, the ongoing discounts on the XUV 700 are likely to negate the lower future value to some extent. Also, if you plan to retain the car for a long period of time, 5 years or more, then resale value becomes less of a deciding factor. So, if you like the XUV 700 and are getting it at a solid discount, go for it.

While the XUV 7XO's third (passenger) touchscreen, new sound system and some other cosmetic enhancements are smaller enhancements over the outgoing XUV 700. But its new dampers with the hydraulic bump stops significantly elevate ride comfort. The latter itself is a strong enough reason to pick the newer version.

 

Mahindra XUV700

Mahindra XUV700

Explore cars mentioned

More questions on similar cars

Expert reviews worth reading

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 26 Jan 2026