Autocar India
•13w

Is the Honda Hornet 2.0 better than the Bajaj Pulsar N160? I'm confused about which one to buy.

Verified
•12w
Both the Honda Hornet 2.0 and Bajaj Pulsar N160 have similar performance and fuel economy in the real world, so picking between the two will boil down to which bike's design, comfort, features and overall ownership experience you prefer. The N160 is also considerably more affordable than the Hornet, and, at the Hornet's price, you could even consider the larger Pulsar N250.
However, Honda bikes are generally known for their hassle-free ownership experience with bulletproof long-term reliability and low maintenance costs. Bajaj's ownership costs, too, are quite frugal, but service can be a point of friction.
Take test rides of both bikes and also speak to your nearest authorised dealer and service center for both brands before you make your decision.
Honda Hornet 2.0

Honda Hornet 2.0

•12w•

Hornet 2.0 is a very good option as it has bigger motor of 184.4cc engine with sufficient amount of torque and camera be easily mauvered in city and stability is very good with chunky 110 section and 140 section rear tyre but you will surely complain regarding the stiff suspension as well as of the poor headlight.It will give you a mileage of about 38km/l in city and 45-50km/l in highway...and there's some vibration in high revving but it's not irritating and if you talk about Pulsar N160 it is also good for city as well as highway but it's riding position is little sportier.Tge tyre are little skinny in N160 and 160cc motor is less powerful compare to 2.0 and it can be felt.The mileage is similar and there is also single seat variant available N160 and the braking is adequate in both and if features Hornet 2.0 is ahead with TFT Meter, TCS,Dual Channel ABS(in both)etc while N160 Gets features like ABS mode etc. The N160 Is cheaper and the reson is due to the use of premium quality parts in honda like NISSIN Brake Caliper in 2.0 while Gremica in N160...suspension are of SHOWA etc.Also the deciding factor is the price where N160 is much cheaper.Overall I would recommend you to choose according to your choices,take test ride and buy which one is suited for you.

•12w•

@its_sayan_ss you can also take look of N250 which got a bigger 250cc motor with 6 speed transmission and thereby the mileage is less and it is still cheaper than 2.0 but i forget to mention that the service quality of honda is better and also reliability is better in honda hornet 2.0 but there are some

•12w•

@its_sayan_ss *gear stucking issues...

More posts on similar bikes

•4d

I’m a first-time car buyer. My usage will be around 40% city driving and 60% on state highways, with a monthly running of approximately 800-1,000 km. The roads are somewhat okay, with some bad stretches but mostly good roads. I’m looking for an automatic transmission. Hatchbacks, compact sedans, and compact SUVs are all fine. My budget is flexible, between Rs. 12 lakh and Rs. 14 lakh. I have shortlisted 3-4 vehicles, namely: 1. Honda Amaze ZX CVT 2. Maruti Brezza ZXi Automatic 3. Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Automatic Any other car recommendations are also welcome. I am currently posted in Varanasi, if that helps.

Verified
•4d

With 40 percent city and 60 percent highway use, the 3XO is the better fit among your three choices. Its turbo petrol engine has considerably stronger low- and mid-range performance than the Brezza and Amaze, which will be useful on state highways, particularly when carrying passengers and luggage. It also has a well-judged ride that copes well with broken roads.The Brezza ZXi AT would be the choice for easier ownership. Its petrol engine is smoother, and Maruti's service network is a significant advantage, while its ride quality is very good on poor roads. It is also the more relaxed choice if outright performance is not important.The Amaze ZX CVT is worth considering if you prefer a sedan. Its CVT is smooth, and the suspension is comfortable over rough city roads, while the large boot is useful for highway trips. However, its engine lacks the punch of the 3XO, particularly with a full load, and the cabin is narrower.The Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT is also worth adding to the shortlist if driving enjoyment is important. It has a well sorted chassis and a conventional automatic, making it particularly appealing for your highway heavy usage.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 4 Jul 2026