Jigar
•6wI am planning to buy the Maruti Suzuki Fronx, but am confused between the 1.2-litre 4-cylinder petrol engine and the 1.0-litre turbo 3-cylinder engine. My driving will be around 60% on highways and 40% in the city. Could you please suggest which engine option would be better suited for my usage?

Autocar India
Considering your 60% highway and 40% city usage, we would suggest going for the Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo petrol.
The turbo engine offers much stronger performance, especially on the highway. Overtakes feel quicker and more effortless, which is important for highway driving. It also comes with a proper 6-speed automatic, which is smoother and more refined compared to the AMT offered with the 1.2 engine, making it better suited for both city and highway use.
The 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine, on the other hand, is smoother and simpler, but it feels less powerful, especially on highways. The AMT gearbox is convenient but not as smooth as the automatic offered with the turbo variant.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx
Explore cars mentioned
RAJ
•6wWhich is more reliable 1ltr turbo or 1.2 NA
Mohiddin
•6wHi there,fronx is unstable at higher speeds on highways once you touch 80+on oddo.better go for 1.2,4 cylinder which offers quite enough power. Don't waste your hard earned money on turbo, rather stretch ur budget and go for creta or seltos base,which offers more features than fronx.And u will get bored with the car interior in short time. Using fronx 1.2 delta since 3 years.
Shani
•6wI never felt this unstability even after touching 140. Please get your wheel alignment check. However for highway the person says drives for 60%, i think NA is still ok.. it is enough reliable and smooth. There is no problem ... Turbo can be purchased only if you want excessive power and often do a rash driving.
Dr Rajesh Kumar Choudhary
•5wHow good is Fronx 1.2 lt automatic and safety factor specially in city driving
madhusudhan rao
•5wFronx na1. 2 4 cylinder is good option for long time keeping since all are ditching 4 cylinders now , but it offers low power compared to turbo so if your preference is highway drive consider safety and fatigue free drive car , fronx is good for city drive and less than 200kms in one strech after that you feet fatigue since cabin is not roomy, there are more partical cars at same price point take a test drive of all cars then buy
madhusudhan rao
•5wWell it's 60 40 drive good for mostly city and occasional highway drive, the na engine is smooth but power is low on highways but turbo is not value when there are other compitators offering better highway machines , also safety is parameter to consider if you are driving on highway which fronx lacks , otherwise it's stable even at 140 speed and good milage but there is driver fatigue after 2 hours of continuous drive.
Siddaraju
•6wPunch CNG accomplished or Fronx CNG which one is better
madhusudhan rao
•5wPunch cng is good for safety and stability but less powered when compared to fronx , you can experience when you drive hill stations with Full load
Saharul
•6wUn save car safety 0 star
Bangarraju
•6wI didn't face any issue Even after 120speed
Sb
•6wHello team Auto car , we r family of 4 member, I want to buy a car for personal use , less drive , City drive mostly , sometimes on highway also to go to village, 700km on highway, atleast 2,3 times in a year , so which one will i have to choose, maruti breeza 1.5 petrol or hundai new venue 1.2petrol engine
Jitendra
•6wI want a good car for village. My budget 7 to 8 lakh .plz suggest me which car is best for me
Sb
•6wFronx
Tejas
•6wGo for a second hand tata safari pura mohila me rola hoga rola
More questions on similar cars
Popular discussions right now
Posted on: 20 Mar 2026
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.
