Autocar India
JI

Jigar

12w

I am planning to buy the Maruti Suzuki Fronx, but am confused between the 1.2-litre 4-cylinder petrol engine and the 1.0-litre turbo 3-cylinder engine. My driving will be around 60% on highways and 40% in the city. Could you please suggest which engine option would be better suited for my usage?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
12w

Considering your 60% highway and 40% city usage, we would suggest going for the Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo petrol.

The turbo engine offers much stronger performance, especially on the highway. Overtakes feel quicker and more effortless, which is important for highway driving. It also comes with a proper 6-speed automatic, which is smoother and more refined compared to the AMT offered with the 1.2 engine, making it better suited for both city and highway use.

The 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine, on the other hand, is smoother and simpler, but it feels less powerful, especially on highways. The AMT gearbox is convenient but not as smooth as the automatic offered with the turbo variant.

RA

RAJ

11w

Which is more reliable 1ltr turbo or 1.2 NA

MO

Mohiddin

11w

Hi there,fronx is unstable at higher speeds on highways once you touch 80+on oddo.better go for 1.2,4 cylinder which offers quite enough power. Don't waste your hard earned money on turbo, rather stretch ur budget and go for creta or seltos base,which offers more features than fronx.And u will get bored with the car interior in short time. Using fronx 1.2 delta since 3 years.

SH

Shani

11w

I never felt this unstability even after touching 140. Please get your wheel alignment check. However for highway the person says drives for 60%, i think NA is still ok.. it is enough reliable and smooth. There is no problem ... Turbo can be purchased only if you want excessive power and often do a rash driving.

DR

Dr Rajesh Kumar Choudhary

11w

How good is Fronx 1.2 lt automatic and safety factor specially in city driving

MR

madhusudhan rao

11w

Fronx na1. 2 4 cylinder is good option for long time keeping since all are ditching 4 cylinders now , but it offers low power compared to turbo so if your preference is highway drive consider safety and fatigue free drive car , fronx is good for city drive and less than 200kms in one strech after that you feet fatigue since cabin is not roomy, there are more partical cars at same price point take a test drive of all cars then buy

MR

madhusudhan rao

11w

Well it's 60 40 drive good for mostly city and occasional highway drive, the na engine is smooth but power is low on highways but turbo is not value when there are other compitators offering better highway machines , also safety is parameter to consider if you are driving on highway which fronx lacks , otherwise it's stable even at 140 speed and good milage but there is driver fatigue after 2 hours of continuous drive.

SI

Siddaraju

11w

Punch CNG accomplished or Fronx CNG which one is better

MR

madhusudhan rao

11w

Punch cng is good for safety and stability but less powered when compared to fronx , you can experience when you drive hill stations with Full load

SA

Saharul

11w

Un save car safety 0 star

BA

Bangarraju

11w

I didn't face any issue Even after 120speed

SB

Sb

11w

Hello team Auto car , we r family of 4 member, I want to buy a car for personal use , less drive , City drive mostly , sometimes on highway also to go to village, 700km on highway, atleast 2,3 times in a year , so which one will i have to choose, maruti breeza 1.5 petrol or hundai new venue 1.2petrol engine

JI

Jitendra

11w

I want a good car for village. My budget 7 to 8 lakh .plz suggest me which car is best for me

SB

Sb

11w

Fronx

TE

Tejas

11w

Go for a second hand tata safari pura mohila me rola hoga rola

More questions on similar cars

AN

Ankit

4d

Hi team, my budget is 12-13 lakh maximum for an automatic car, so it is easy to drive for both my wife and me in Hyderabad city traffic. I am a first-time car buyer and am feeling quite confused. My requirements are: good mileage, petrol engine, good boot space, rear-view camera, hill assist, and recent interiors. Kindly help.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

Consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo-petrol automatic in Zeta trim. In Hyderabad traffic, it is easy to drive, the steering is light, the automatic keeps stop-and-go stress low, and you get hill-hold and a clear rear camera that makes ramps and tight parking simple. It is a turbo-petrol and returns good mileage for daily use – expect roughly 10-11kpl in the city and 16kpl on the highway. The 308-litre boot takes airport bags and weekly shopping without fuss, and the cabin is well built and comfortable. Ground clearance is higher than that of a hatchback, so speed breakers and broken patches are less of a worry.Your budget should cover the Zeta automatic in Hyderabad, but if it feels like a stretch, the Fronx is also available with a naturally aspirated 1.2-litre engine and an AMT. This combo won’t have the highway performance of the turbo-petrol and the AMT shifts with a slight pause between gears, so it won’t be as seamless as the turbo's torque-converter automatic. However, it will deliver higher mileage, in the region of 13-14kpl in the city and 18kpl-plus on the highway.For a first-time buyer, Maruti’s reliability and stellar service network make the most sense. However, if you want an alternative, the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 turbo-petrol automatic is also a good choice. It has a more SUV-like presence, and the cabin feels more premium, but the boot is a bit smaller, and efficiency won’t be as good as the Fronx’s.Overall, the Fronx fits your needs best.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 20 Mar 2026