autocar-logo
Delhi
HK

Hemanth Kumar

9w

I am currently using a 2017 Activa 4G, and now I want to buy a bike for a daily commute of around 60 km. I am a bit confused between the Bajaj Pulsar N160 and the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V. Kindly suggest which one would be better, along with clear information on their specifications, and which one is more suitable for better mileage.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5w
Both the Bajaj Pulsar N160 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V are excellent machines, and picking between the two will boil down to which bike's look you prefer, what brand you prefer, and your stature. Both are very evenly matched in terms of performance, fuel economy, and comfort, but the Apache is a bit better in terms of overall ride experience. It's only if you are a very tall rider that we'd recommend you go for the Pulsar because taller riders will feel cramped in the seat-to-footpeg area on the Apache.
We would recommend a test ride of both to determine which is best for you.
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

Got a suggestion for Hemanth?

Add a Comment

Latest questions people are discussing

BM

B M

1w

I ride around 30 km daily in the city and also have back problems. I have shortlisted three motorcycles: the Triumph Speed 400, Honda CB350RS, and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V. Which of these bikes would you recommend for comfortable daily commuting?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

Between the three bikes you've shortlisted, all three are comfortable for city use, but they all sit at very different price points, and it wouldn't be right to compare the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V with the Honda CB350RS and Triumph Speed 400. If you want a straightforward commuter, then sticking to a machine in the 150-160cc space like the aforementioned Apache, Bajaj Pulsar N160, and Honda Unicorn would make sense. These bikes will be lighter and easier to manage within the city (which is where you'll spend most of your life), as well as be fuel-efficient and comfortable. If instead you do want to look at something more premium, the Honda and Triumph you have shortlisted are also good options. You should also look at the Royal Enfield Classic / Bullet 350 in this segment. These bikes will be larger and more spacious than the 150/160cc options mentioned above, with better build quality, road presence and pillion comfort. However, they will demand a little more effort at slow speeds and will also not be as fuel-efficient as the commuters.

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
Honda Bikes CB350RS
Triumph Speed 400
Bajaj Pulsar N160
Honda Bikes Unicorn
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Royal Enfield Bullet 350
SE

Selvakumar

1w

I’m a long-time Autocar fan and a 5’10” rider planning to replace my 2015 Royal Enfield Thunderbird 350 with a more practical maxi-scooter for daily commuting and errands. My main priorities are comfort and fuel efficiency. I am currently considering the Yamaha Aerox 155 and the Hero Xoom 160. Which one would you recommend? Also, would it be worth waiting for the Yamaha Nmax 155, or is there a better alternative I should consider?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

In our experience, neither the Yamaha Aerox 155 nor the Hero Xoom 160 have proven to be comfortable, especially over broken roads. Instead of these two, we'd recommend you give a long, hard look at the TVS Ntorq 150. On paper, it might seem like a step down compared to the Yamaha and Hero with its 12-inch wheels and air-cooled engine, but in reality, it is the better product. With plush suspension, a spacious underseat storage and peppy performance, the bigger Ntorq makes for a compelling sporty scooter that doesn't sacrifice practicality. In our routine tests, we also found that - when ridden gently - it can be surprisingly fuel efficient. Do take a test ride of the Ntorq 150 to see if it resonates with you.

Yamaha Aerox 155
Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
TVS Ntorq 150

Posted on: 31 Jan 2026