Tvs Ronin vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Autocar India

Engine & Transmission

Fuel Type/ Propulsion

Petrol
Petrol

Engine Displacement

225.9 cc
349.34 cc

Valvetrain

4 Valves/Cyl
2 Valves/Cyl

Cooling

Oil Cooled
Air/Oil Cooled

Engine Type

1 cylinder
1 cylinder

Aspiration

Naturally Aspirated
Naturally Aspirated

Max Engine Power

20.1 bhp @ 7750 rpm
20.2 hp @ 6100 rpm

Max Engine Torque

19.93 Nm @ 3750 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm

Bore

66 mm
72 mm

Stroke

66 mm
85.8 mm

Spark Plugs

1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder

Number of Gears

5
5

Slipper clutch

Transmission Type

Manual
Manual

Clutch

Assist And Slipper Clutch
Assist And Slipper Clutch

Fueling

Fuel Injection

Reverse gear

Fuel & Performance

Fuel Tank Size

14 L
13 L

Official Fuel Economy

42 kmpl
36.2 kmpl

City Fuel Economy as Tested

32.3 kmpl
36.2 kmpl

Highway Fuel Economy as Tested

36.6 kmpl
39.8 kmpl

Reserve Fuel Capacity

2.8 L
2.6 L

Top Speed

120 kph
130 kph

Auto Start/Stop

User Reported Mileage

40.47 kmpl
34.61 kmpl

0-60kph

4.26 sec
4.95 sec

0-100kph

14.19 sec
15.15 sec

60-0kph

16.17 m
16.18 m

0-80kph

7.63 sec
8.75 sec

0-40kph

2.25 sec
2.57 sec

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis name

Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Double-downtube Frame

Chassis type

Double Cradle
Double Cradle

Front Suspension Type

41dia. Upside Down Fork
Telescopic, 41mm forks, 130mm travel

Rear Suspension Type

Monoshock with 7 step adjustable preload
Twin tube emulsion shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Rear Suspension Adjustability

Front Brakes

Disc
Disc

Rear Brakes

Disc
Disc

Wheel Type

Alloy
Alloy

Wheel Construction

Alloy
Alloy

Tyre type

Tubeless
Tubeless

Front Tyre Size

110/70 - 17
100/80 - 17

Rear Tyre Size

130/70 - 17
120/80 - 17

Calliper Type

Front - 2 Piston, Rear - 1 Piston
Front - 2 Piston

Front Wheel Size

17 inch
17 inch

Rear Wheel Size

17 inch
17 inch

Front Brake Type

Disc
Disc

Front Brake Size

300 mm
300 mm

Rear Brake Type

Disc
Disc

Rear Brake Size

240 mm
153 mm

Front Disc/Drum Size

300 mm

Rear Disc/Drum Size

153 mm

Wheel Size

17 inch

Brake type

Front - Disc, Rear - Disc

Dimensions

Length

2040 mm

Width

805 mm

Height

1170 mm

Wheelbase

1357 mm

Seat height

795 mm
790 mm

Ground Clearance

181 mm
160 mm

Kerb Weight

160 kg
181 kg

Safety

Side-stand engine cut-off

Traction control

Hazard lights

Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS)

Dual channel

Features

Pillion Seat

Low Oil Indicator

Navigation

Antilock Braking System

Switchable ABS
Dual Channel ABS

Odometer

Pass-light switch

Pillion Backrest

Pillion Footrest

Pillion Grabrail

No. of Tripmeters

2
2

Quickshifter

Shift Light

Stand Alarm

Start Type

Electric Start
Electric Start

Tripmeter

Tripmeters Type

Digital
Digital

Turn Signal

USB Charging Port

Engine-kill switch

Clock

Cruise Control

Daytime Running Lights

Digital Fuel Guage

Electric Start

Brake/Tail Light

LED
Halogen Bulb

Bluetooth Connectivity

Headlamp Type

LED
LED

Headlight Bulb Type

LED
LED

Battery

12V, 6Ah
12 V - 8 Ah VRLA

Keyless Lock

Low Battery Indicator

Adjustable Windscreen

Luggage Panniers

Power Modes

Riding Modes

Heated Seat

Audio System

Heated Grips

Instrumentation

Trip Meter

Average Speed

Touchscreen

Tachometer Type

Digital

Tachometer

Speedometer

Digital

Service due indicator

Engine/Motor temperature gauge

Gear Indicator

Instrument console

Digital
Semi-Digital

Low Fuel Level Warning

Average Fuel Consumption

TFT colour Instrument cluster

Fuel gauge

Questions you may find useful

10w

I am planning to buy a new bike and have shortlisted two options: the TVS Ronin and the Royal Enfield Hunter 350. Which one would be the better choice?

Verified
9w

Both the bikes you have shortlisted are similar on paper and in terms of their laidback, relaxed riding experience. Picking between the two will boil down to factors like fuel economy, styling and pricing. The TVS Ronin's oddball styling will be more polarising than the clean styling of the Royal Enfield Hunter, although the Ronin is lighter and has slightly better ride and handling than the Hunter. It also managed to be a little more fuel efficient than the Hunter in our tests, although fuel economy varies greatly depending on your riding style. Finally, the Ronin is also quite a bit more affordable than the Hunter, with the top-end variants of both differing by as much as Rs 20,000 when it comes to ex-showroom pricing. Of course, deciding on which one purely on these factors wouldn't be fair to either and if you want to make an informed decision, take exhaustive test rides of both before you go ahead with your purchase. The Hunter is a very different sort of Royal Enfield with some core strengths like a characterful, torquey engine and good comfort. The Ronin's trump cards are that it can handle very well and is the more economical of the two to purchase and run.

TVS Ronin
Royal Enfield Hunter 350