Security flaws found in Tesla and McLaren keyless entry

    Belgian University team uncovers serious hacking risk to the keyless entry system developed by Pektron.

    Published On Sep 11, 2018 12:11:00 PM

    4,387 Views

    A serious security flaw has been revealed in the keyless entry and start system used by brands like Tesla and McLaren. A team of researchers from the Computer Security and Industrial Cryptography research group (COSIC) at the University of Leuven, Belgium were able to attack and clone the key fob of two Tesla Model S cars in “a matter of seconds,” allowing the bearer of the fob to unlock and start the vehicle.

    The system was developed by software company Pektron and is said to be fitted into numerous high-end models. According to the research team, the Pektron system is easier to attack than other systems of this type because attackers don’t need to be close to the car and the key fob at the same time.

    McLaren has confirmed that the research demonstrates a “theoretical vulnerability” in their vehicle security systems. However, the research has “not been proven to affect our vehicles, and we know of no McLaren that has been compromised in such a way.” Although customers are being contacted by email to inform them of the issue, and are being sent a signal blocking pouch to keep the car key safe from potential hackers.

    Tesla previously released a ‘pin to drive’ security feature as a response to the findings. The researchers recommend owners using this in addition to disabling the passive entry system.

     

    Copyright (c) Autocar UK. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.29%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    31.56%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.92%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.24%

    Total Votes : 1407
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe