Triumph Scrambler 400 XC: Top 3 reasons to buy and 2 to skip

The Triumph Scrambler 400 XC is the latest addition to the Bajaj-made 400cc models in the British bike maker’s line-up and is also the most expensive. It is mechanically very similar to the Scrambler 400 X, and here, we’ll list out three of its strong points and two areas where it leaves something to be desired. 

Reasons to buy the Triumph Scrambler 400 XC

1 Stylish and well-built

The 400cc Triumphs have always been lauded for their excellent build quality and handsome looks, especially so in the context of their rather affordable asking price. The Scrambler 400 XC continues that trend with its lovely neo-retro silhouette and cross-spoke Excel rims. 

2 Punchy performance 

With 40hp and 37.5Nm of torque on tap, the Scrambler 400 XC is certainly no slouch, and what aids matters further is the city-friendly demeanour of its engine. Its tractability and short gearing make hustling through traffic a breeze, and once you hit the open road, its performance will keep you engaged.  

3 Comfort

Tall suspension, commanding ergonomics and generously padded seats all work together to make the Scrambler 400 XC a machine that can deal with the worst of our roads with ease. The higher seat and more forward-set foot pegs also result in a more relaxed knee position than on the Speed 400, and comfort is definitely a strong point here.

Reasons not to buy the Triumph Scrambler 400 XC

1 Dull brakes, average tyres

In our previous experience with the Scrambler 400 X, we had pointed out that the bike needs sharper brake bite at the front and deserves better rubber. These aforementioned issues have also made their way over to the 400 XC, and they should have been ironed out by now.

2 Tall seat height

At 835mm, the Scrambler 400 XC, as well as the X, can prove to be tall and intimidating machines for shorter riders. Combine that with the 190kg kerb weight of the XC (185kg for the 400 X), and the 400cc Scramblers can feel challenging to swing a leg over for smaller riders.

Also See: Royal Enfield Hunter 350 fuel economy tested, explained