Autocar India
SU

Subhrakant

34w

I am looking to upgrade from my 2018 Audi A6 to a luxury SUV within a budget of ₹1 crore. I have narrowed it down to two final choices: the Jaguar F-Pace and the Lexus RX. Which one should I go for?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
7w

The Jaguar F-Pace, unfortunately, is discontinued globally, and if you're still able to get hold of one, it will likely be stock that the dealer is still trying to clear. If so, negotiate hard for a lower price. The F-Pace is an excellent driver's SUV with smooth, reasonably punchy engines and a superb chassis. 

However, though the 2021 facelift brought in some key modernities, it now feels dated by modern standards. It shares components with Land Rover products; future support could be uncertain as Jaguar is moving entirely to EVs from next year. 

As such, you should go for the Lexus RX. It's a bit more spacious and far more luxurious with a thoroughly modern interior. Plus, being a strong hybrid, the fuel efficiency is incredible, and Lexus is also synonymous with reliability and reasonable maintenance by luxury car standards. 

Plus, having only been introduced in 2023, the Lexus RX has plenty of life left in it yet.

Lexus RX

Lexus RX

Explore cars mentioned

More questions on similar cars

MM

Marivel Murugan

8h

I currently drive a 2014 Honda City diesel and am planning an upgrade. I am 60, so ease of driving and parking is important. We are considering the Grand Vitara / e-Vitara and the new Seltos, but I am concerned that the Seltos may feel too large for city use (wider body and larger ORVMs). Would it be difficult to manoeuvre and park? Alternatively, would you suggest waiting for the Sierra EV or BYD Atto 2, or are they also likely to be similarly large? I find the Creta and Hyryder well balanced for narrow roads and easy driving (due to their relatively smaller ORVMs). I would appreciate your recommendation.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4h

Given your mostly city use and the need for easy driving and parking, the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara or Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Strong Hybrid fits you best from your list. They offer a slightly higher seating position than your 2014 City, so getting in and out is easier, and in traffic the hybrid often moves on electric power first, which makes it very smooth and calm to drive. The size feels friendly in narrow lanes, the mirrors are not bulky, and the steering is light, so slotting into tight spots is simple. If you pick a trim with a 360-degree camera and front sensors, it takes the stress out of parking.On your Seltos worry: in real life it is not meaningfully wider than Creta or Hyryder, and its steering is easy too. The mirrors do look larger, but once you set them and use auto-fold, they don’t get in the way. That said, since you already find the Hyryder comfortable on narrow roads, it (or the Grand Vitara) will feel more comfortable, as it is a bit smaller.Two things to note about these SUVs: the boot is smaller than the petrol-only versions, and when you press hard the engine gets a bit loud and quick highway passes need some planning. As for the Sierra EV, it is larger than all these, while the launch timeline of the BYD Atto 2 is still uncertain.

VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Grand Vitara
VehicleHyundai Creta
KA

Karthik

1w

I am planning to buy a 2019 Fiat Linea 125S T-Jet, but I am concerned about whether it is compatible with E20 petrol. The car I test drove was neatly maintained. Since only E20 petrol is available, do I need regular servicing and change its spare parts? Also, please suggest if this is a good option or provide a better alternative.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5h

A 2019 Fiat Linea 125s T-Jet is fundamentally designed for E10, but most manufacturers engineer a safety margin, so many components can comfortably tolerate up to around E15. Running it on E20 is unlikely to cause any immediate or catastrophic damage, but over time the higher ethanol content can accelerate wear of rubber hoses, seals, plastic parts and some metal components, so you may need to replace these a bit earlier than usual.Given you’ve test-driven the Fiat car and it’s neatly maintained, you can certainly consider it if you go in with your eyes open. The key is to be a bit more proactive with preventive maintenance:Regularly inspect fuel lines, hoses and seals, and replace them at the first sign of swelling, cracking or seepage.Avoid long periods of inactivity with fuel sitting in the tank, as ethanol absorbs moisture and can promote corrosion.The bigger, non-negotiable concern is parts support. Fiat has exited the market, and while Linea spare parts are still available through independent suppliers and online platforms, they will never be as easy or as quick to source as those for a current mass-market sedan. The 125s T-Jet is also a relatively rare variant, so engine-specific bits may require patience.If your trusted garage can confidently arrange parts for routine wear-and-tear and occasional bigger jobs, then the Linea T-Jet remains a very satisfying, enthusiast-friendly choice. If they’re hesitant about spares, it’s wiser to look at a more common, current model that’s officially E20-compatible.

YA

Yash

1w

I am confused between the 7XO and Safari. I took the test drive of both and loved the rugged suspension setup of the Safari, but I also liked the easy driving nature and dynamics of the 7XO.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
5h

Between the two, the Tata Safari does a great job of projecting toughness. It feels solid, has that reassuring heft, and its suspension setup really shines on broken roads and you can carry speed with confidence and it just shrugs off rough patches.That said, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is the more rounded package overall. Its 2.2-litre diesel is not just more modern, but also noticeably smoother and stronger than the older Fiat-sourced 2.0-litre unit in the Safari. It delivers better drivability in everyday conditions, which makes a difference in city use as well as on the highway.Mahindra car has also worked well on the suspension, and the improvements show. The 7XO feels more composed, offers better ride comfort over a wider range of surfaces, and is simply easier to drive. It has lighter controls, better balance, and a more user-friendly nature overall.Where the Safari still holds an edge is in the third row. It’s more usable and accommodating, whereas the 7XO’s last row is quite tight and best reserved for occasional use.So unless third-row space is a priority, the 7XO stands out as the better all-rounder. It’s more refined, easier to live with, and ultimately the more modern SUV.

VehicleTata Safari
VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO

Popular discussions right now

KY

Krishna Yadav

5d

I am planning to sell my Mahindra XUV700 and switch to the Renault Duster. I would like your expert opinion on whether this would be a good decision.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

On paper and in real-world ownership, these are very different cars, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO sits in a clear segment above. The XUV 700 is a bigger, more complete SUV. It offers more space, better road presence, stronger performance and a far richer overall experience, including the option of a third row and a more premium cabin. It is designed as a proper family SUV and feels more capable on highways and long drives.The Renault Duster, even in its new form, is a simpler, more driver-focused and lighter SUV. It will likely be easier to drive in the city and feel more rugged and straightforward, but it is still a step down in terms of overall size, features and cabin experience.So the decision really comes down to intent. If you are moving because you want something more compact, easier to use daily and less feature-heavy, then the Duster can make sense. But if you are expecting it to feel like an upgrade or even equal to the XUV700 in terms of space, comfort and overall experience, it will not.

VehicleRenault Duster
DE

Devakumar

5d

I have booked the Tata Sierra Adventure Plus petrol manual, but I am now confused between the petrol and diesel manual variants, particularly in terms of mileage and performance. I am not interested in an automatic transmission. My annual running is less than 6,000 km. Could you please advise which engine option would be more suitable for my usage? Additionally, I would appreciate any alternative suggestions for a spacious car with good mileage that fits my needs.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4d

The Tata Sierra is a big, heavy car, and the petrol engine, being a naturally aspirated unit, feels just about adequate, especially once you load it up or hit the highway. The diesel, on the other hand, suits the car far better with its stronger low-end pull, making overtakes easier and long-distance driving far more relaxed.That said, with your low annual running of under 6000 km, the petrol still makes sense if your usage is mostly in the city. It will feel smoother, easier to live with and perfectly adequate for everyday driving, even if it lacks that effortless punch on highways.If you are open to alternatives for a better petrol manual experience, the Renault Duster with its turbo petrol engine is a strong option. It feels far more effortless to drive, while naturally aspirated options like the Kia Seltos or Hyundai Creta offer a more refined and effortless experience than the Sierra petrol.

VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleRenault Duster
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHyundai Creta
RO

Rohin

1w

I am confused about buying the AMT version of the Skoda Kylaq, Tata Nexon, or Maruti Fronx. My budget is between 11 and 13 lakh. My usage is mostly city driving of about 1,000 km per month, with occasional long highway drives.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
3d

Between the three, the Skoda Kylaq is the best automatic for the money. It doesn’t use an AMT but a proper 6‑speed torque-converter with the 1.0 TSI, which is smooth, robust and easily the nicest for your occasional highway runs.The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo also gets the same 6‑speed torque-converter auto, and while it is refined and efficient, it doesn’t have the same solid, European feel or driving dynamics as the Kylaq. However, from an overall cost-of-ownership point of view - price, fuel efficiency and service, the Fronx is likely to work out cheaper.The Tata Nexon in your budget doesn’t get a torque-converter. You mainly have a 6‑speed AMT, which is convenient but nowhere near as smooth or quick as a proper automatic. There is also a 7‑speed DCA dual‑clutch option, which is noticeably better than the AMT, but still not as seamless as the autos in the Kylaq and Fronx, and it can push the price higher.For 11-13 lakh, 1,000km a month in the city and the odd long drive, we would pick the Kylaq auto. If budget discipline and running costs are top priority, go for the Fronx 1.0 turbo automatic.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleTata Nexon

Posted on: 27 Feb 2026