Autocar India
4d

My running is around 2,500 km per month, currently between Faridabad and Dwarka. My route is likely to change next year, but the monthly distance should remain similar, with more highway driving than at present. Budget is max Rs. 21 lakh on-road. Looking for a safe, reliable, long-term car that is comfortable for the driver. I generally prefer sedans. For context, I drove an 8th-gen Civic AT for 2.5 lakh km and am currently driving a Ciaz AT. I've shortlisted a few options, but each seems to have a drawback: Punch EV 40 - Seats felt too hard, cabin didn't feel very premium. Sonet Diesel AT GTX - Safety concerns. Venue Diesel AT SX(O) - City fuel efficiency doesn't seem great. Curvv Diesel AT - Concerned about long-term prospects as it doesn't seem to be selling well. Verna 1.5 Turbo DCT - Worried about city fuel efficiency. City Hybrid - Stretching beyond my budget. Creta Petrol AT - Safety rating not very reassuring. Am I missing any good options? Would appreciate suggestions, especially from people with high annual running and long-term ownership experience.

Verified
12m

Given your 2,500km monthly running, we'd actually recommend looking at a strong hybrid rather than a diesel. Our pick would be the Maruti Suzuki Victoris Hybrid. It fits within your budget, has a 5-star Bharat NCAP safety rating, offers excellent fuel efficiency in both city and highway driving and is backed by Maruti Suzuki's extensive service network. It also provides the kind of smooth, refined driving experience that should feel like a natural progression from your Civic and Ciaz. While it isn't a sedan, it offers generous interior space and excellent long-distance comfort.Another advantage is that, being a petrol hybrid, it is a more future-proof choice for Delhi NCR. With increasing scrutiny on diesel vehicles and evolving regulations in the region, a petrol hybrid offers greater long-term peace of mind while still delivering running costs that are comparable to many diesel SUVs.The City Hybrid would have been another obvious recommendation given your preference for sedans, but as you've mentioned, it stretches your budget.Among your shortlisted cars, we'd still lean towards the Verna Turbo DCT if you want to stay with a sedan. However, with your annual running, fuel costs will be significantly higher than with a strong hybrid.We would also be cautious about choosing the Seltos, Sonet or Venue diesel purely for efficiency. While all three use the same proven 1.5-litre diesel engine paired with a torque-converter automatic, it isn't the most fuel-efficient diesel automatic in real-world conditions.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Victoris
VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleKia Sonet
Maruti Suzuki Victoris
Maruti Suzuki Victoris
1w

Hello, This is going to be a long one. I am currently in the market for an ADV motorcycle under Rs. 3 lakh OTR. At the moment, my shortlist consists of the RTX 300, KTM Adventure 250, and Suzuki V-Strom SX 250. I am 185 cm tall, and most of that height seems to be concentrated in my legs. Consider me a stork with rather impoverished bodywork; some say that I could realistically reach Sri Lanka in a single stride. Anyway, I have ridden all three motorcycles and, to be honest, the more I ride them, the more perplexed I become. My priorities are reliability, maintenance costs, longevity, and decent fuel economy, with considerably less emphasis on outright off-road capability. I want a motorcycle that is rugged, dependable, and willing to take me wherever I wish to go without complaint. At present, my mind keeps returning to the V-Strom SX. It is road-friendly, reliable, comfortable, and appears to offer a largely hassle-free ownership experience. The problem is the price. In Kerala, the current OTR figure stretches to approximately Rs. 2.6 lakh, which I cannot help feeling is somewhat undeserved for what is, fundamentally, an ageing package. My concern regarding the RTX 300 is that it is an entirely new platform. Its long-term reliability, durability, and ownership experience remain largely unknown. The sensible part of my brain keeps suggesting that I wait for the second iteration, by which point most early issues should have become apparent and, hopefully, resolved. As for the KTM Adventure 250, I find it difficult to ignore the value proposition of its larger 390 siblings. The 250 is undoubtedly a capable machine, but I remain unconvinced that it represents the sweet spot within KTM's ADV range. Fortunately, I am not in a hurry and can afford to wait if necessary. I do not particularly mind the V-Strom's lack of modern features, nor the fact that its engine design has been around for what feels like several geological epochs. If anything, those characteristics are part of its appeal. What frustrates me slightly is Suzuki's apparent lack of commitment towards the platform and its future development. Given my priorities and use case, I would greatly appreciate your thoughts and recommendations.

Verified
53m

For your use case, we'd suggest you go for the TVS Apache RTX 300. It might be based on a brand-new platform and have the niggles that usually accompany it, but other than that, the RTX is a phenomenally capable machine. Since you ride primarily on the road, you will enjoy its lovely handling, great comfort and punchy performance. We're recommending it over both the Suzuki V-Strom SX and KTM 250 Adventure because the former just feels too long in the tooth now and is also not comparable to the other two, while the latter lacks the performance, comfort and feature-set that the RTX gives you, despite costing more. Also worth keeping in mind is that the RTX will be a little expensive in terms of after-sales costs - likely to be higher than the KTMs. However, TVS will soon open its premium sales and service outlets under the Paddock umbrella, and that should improve the overall after-sales experience, which is currently a known concern.

TVS Apache RTX
Suzuki V-Strom SX
KTM 250 Adventure
1w

Hi. I am planning to buy my first bike and am confused between the FZ-FI Hybrid, N160 and Sp160. This is primarily for my daily commute to the office(20 km to and fro) in a route with jam-packed traffic. Mileage and comfort (both for me and the pillion) are important to me. I am tall (6ft). The reason I chose the N160 to be in this list is that I thought it might not feel underpowered after 3-4 years. What would be the most sensible option? PS, I come from an Activa I, and that's my only source of driving experience.

Verified
1h

We'd advise you to choose between the Honda SP160 and the Bajaj Pulsar N160. The SP160 is essentially a dressed-up and more feature-rich Unicorn, so you're getting a proven base to work with, and it should be well-suited to traffic-riddled commutes. It will be quite frugal and comfortable for two-up riding with its spacious single-piece seat.The Bajaj Pulsar N160 will be a step above the Honda in terms of performance, and it also balances fuel economy quite well. Its riding triangle is accommodating of larger riders like yourself, and its suspension is well-suited to dealing with bad roads. We'd recommend you go for one of the single-seat variants on offer because it will offer better seating comfort, especially when riding two-up. These bikes are quite similar, and to decide between them, take a test ride of both. The Yamaha FZ Hybrid offers you a nifty and quick-working start/stop system but its not worth its asking price. And on top of that, the FZ isn't as accomplished as its rivals from TVS, Bajaj and Honda so we'd recommend you decide between the SP160 and N160.

Honda Bikes SP160
Bajaj Pulsar N160