Mumbai

Mani Nair

•5w

Hi Autocar Team, Could you please share the strong hybrid options from Toyota that are expected to launch in India by the end of 2026, apart from the existing Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder?

Autocar India

•4w

We expect Toyota to expand its strong hybrid lineup modestly till end of 2026 rather than a big wave of all-new models.

Apart from the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder, the most likely additions are a lower-cost variant of the Toyota Innova Hycross, which is expected to retain the same strong hybrid system. But be positioned more accessibly to widen appeal, and a three-row version of the Hyryder, which is expected to carry forward the same strong hybrid setup in a more family-friendly package.

The key point is that Toyota’s near-term strategy for India is to scale its existing strong hybrid systems across more body styles and price points rather than introduce completely new hybrid engines.

Explore cars mentioned

Toyota

Innova HyCross

from ₹21.60 Lakh

Toyota

Urban Cruiser Hyryder

from ₹13.01 Lakh

Want to sell your car?

Sell your car at the right price, without the stress.

Sell your Car

More questions on similar cars

Senthil Kumar

•3d

I own a Grande Punto MJD 2012 Dynamic and am planning to upgrade. Don't want to go for pure ICE cars. Hence, I am left with a few options, and I am inclined towards Toyota. However, they don't have any Hybrids (own badge) in that segment. Thought they would launch Corolla Sedan or Cross with Hybrid engines. Hence, I am now left with the Honda City Hybrid in the upgrade space. Or I need to go for a higher budget Innova Hycross or UC Hyryder (which I am in dilemma). What would be your suggestion? Will Toyota launch the Corolla Cross surprisingly in the Indian Market, or go with the currently available Hybrid models?

Autocar India

•2d

Given your situation, we wouldn't wait for a Toyota Corolla or Corolla Cross Hybrid. While Toyota is evaluating additional hybrid models for India, neither appears likely to arrive anytime soon.Among the cars available today, the Honda City e:HEV is a very compelling option. Its hybrid system is proven, fuel efficiency is excellent, and the driving experience is more refined than most strong hybrids in its price range. If you enjoy sedans and don't specifically need SUV-like ground clearance, it remains one of the best hybrid packages on sale today.If you want an SUV, the decision comes down to the Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid and stretching your budget for the Innova Hycross Hybrid. The Hyryder is efficient, reliable and easy to recommend, but if your hesitation is that it feels too closely related to a Maruti product, that perception is unlikely to change after purchase. The Hycross, on the other hand, feels like a more substantial upgrade and offers significantly more space, comfort and road presence.

Honda City

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Toyota Innova HyCross

Nikhil shrimali

•2d

I currently own a Maruti Suzuki Ertiga, which is either 5-seater or a 7-seater with a large boot space. I am planning to upgrade and am currently confused between the Toyota Innova HyCross and the Mahindra XUV 7XO. My annual running is around 35,000-40,000 km. Space and seating capacity are important requirements for my daily work. Based on these needs, which of these two vehicles would you recommend? Alternatively, is there any other option that might suit my requirements better?

Autocar India

•2d

Go for the Toyota Innova HyCross, because space is your maximum priority, and it has the most usable third row and the best boot flexibility here. The HyCross’ cabin is wider, the floor is flatter, and access to the last row is easier, so adults actually fit. Fold the third row and you get a big, clean load bay for daily work. The hybrid is smooth and quiet in traffic and will save you fuel in city use, as well as out on the highway.Pick the Mahindra XUV 7XO only if you want diesel punch, the SUV body style and road presence, and the latest tech. Its third row and boot are smaller and fuel use is higher, so is ultimately not as practical a 7-seater as the Hycross. The only thing you have to bear in mind is the Innova Hycross hybrid price at the top end will be higher than the XUV 7XO. That aside, however, the Toyota car remains the better option for you.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Mahindra XUV 7XO

Mohit Kakde

•6d

I currently own a first-generation Toyota Innova diesel (7-seater) that I bought in 2008. It has covered 2.75 lakh km. Even today, I am inclined towards the Innova HyCross because of Toyota's reliability and long-term ownership experience. I am looking for a spacious family vehicle that offers comfort, good ride and handling, reliability, and is enjoyable to drive. My annual running is approximately 9,500 km, with 70% city use in Mumbai and 30% highway use, mainly on the Mumbai-Satara route. My budget is Rs 26 lakh, and the Hycross Hybrid is beyond that. I have considered the HyCross GX(O) petrol, but I am concerned about its fuel efficiency in city conditions. Should I still consider it? If not, what other options would suit my requirements? I am open to both SUVs and MPVs, although I am not inclined towards the Ertiga, XL6, or Kia Carens, as they do not feel like significant upgrades.

Autocar India

•2d

Yes, buy the Innova HyCross GXO non-hybrid. Your 70% Mumbai use and only 9,500 km a year means the hybrid’s big price jump will take ages to recover, while the GXO still gives you the Innova space, comfort and Toyota’s easy long-term ownership. In real Mumbai traffic, expect roughly 8-10 kpl and about 12-14 kpl on the Mumbai-Satara run. The automatic is smooth in the city, the ride is calm, and the third row is far better than any SUV at this price.One honest catch: the 2.0 petrol is relaxed, not exciting, and the GXO trim is light on features. If you want sharper performance and more kit, you will need to stretch, which you said you do not want to.If you still want options, look at the Hyundai Alcazar 1.5 turbo petrol. It is nicer to drive in the city and decently efficient, but it is a size smaller, and the third row is tight.The Mahindra XUV 7XO petrol is quick and feature-rich, yet its third row and boot cannot match the Innova, and long-term peace of mind still tilts toward Toyota. Diesel versions of these two could also be an option, but with your city-heavy running, you will need to make extra trips on the highway to keep the DPF healthy.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Hyundai Alcazar

Mahindra XUV 7XO

View all Posts

Expert reviews worth reading

ToyotaInnova HyCross

Read expert review

ToyotaUrban Cruiser Hyryder

Read expert review

Popular discussions right now

Balaji

•5d

I am looking to buy a 6/7-seater EV. My primary usage will be as a 4-seater, with occasional 6-seater use. I will mainly drive it in the city for my daily office commute and undertake long-distance trips of around 500 km once every two months. I have a solar setup at home and can charge the vehicle comfortably. My budget is Rs 30-40 lakh, although I can stretch it slightly if required.

Autocar India

•4d

You should go for the Mahindra XEV 9S. It's a proper three-row EV, and it fits your use case perfectly. With home solar charging, your running costs are very low, and the smooth, quiet drive is just right for city runs as a 4-seater. When you do need six or seven seats, the third row is reasonably spacious, and for your 500 km trip every couple of months, you’ll need just one quick top-up at a highway charger.Do note that with all three rows up, boot space is tight, so your highway trips will require some planning.Alternatively, consider the Kia Carens Clavis EV. It isn't as feature-rich and doesn't have as much range as the XEV 9S, but its third row is more comfortable for adults.

Mahindra XEV 9S

Kia Carens Clavis EV

Abhishek Das

•2d

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India

•15h

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

Honda Amaze

Skoda Kylaq

Anshuman Mishra

•6d

I am planning to buy an automatic car for my family and am confused between the Kia Sonet and the Skoda Kylaq. Could you please advise which one would be the better choice and explain the pros and cons of each?

Autocar India

•5d

Skoda Kylaq is the better family automatic, mainly because it gives you a bit more cabin and boot space and a calmer ride over bad roads. It feels more secure at highway speeds with a full load, and its turbo engine with the automatic pulls cleanly, so hills and quick overtakes are easy even with the AC on. The petrol Kylaq automatic uses a torque convertor gearbox which is also smoother than the dual clutch unit on the Sonet so it would fare better in city traffic. Kia Sonet makes sense if you want more features and need Kia’s service reach which is wider. For weekend trips with four on board it will do the job too, but rear seat width and long-journey comfort are not its strong points and within a year it will get a major update, thus buying it now would not be ideal.

Skoda Kylaq

Kia Sonet

View all Posts

New car launches to explore