Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

•1y

I’m planning to upgrade from my current 250cc bike to a mid-size ADV. I’m eyeing the Honda NX500, but is it worth waiting for the Royal Enfield Himalayan 750? My top priorities are reliability, after-sales service, and a fun-to-ride experience on Indian roads.

•50w

The Honda NX500 is a superb machine in nearly all respects when considering it through the lens of a prospective ADV rider - except for its steep price tag, especially after the recent GST 2.0 reform. Nevertheless, this is a machine that is likely to last you a long time without any significant hassles and will also hold its value well should you decide to sell it someday in the future.

Coming to the Royal Enfield Himalayan 750, there are absolutely no concrete details available about the bike currently, so commenting on its reliability or after-sales service isn't possible.

Even if you do decide to pull the trigger as soon as the big Himalayan is launched, we would strongly advise you to wait for a minimum of 6 months so that if there are any teething issues, they are solved by the time you put your own money down.

Explore bikes mentioned

Honda Bikes

NX500

from ₹8.05 Lakh

More posts on similar bikes

•6d

I currently own a H'ness CB350 which is causing me some discomfort even after upgrading its seat. The Mumbai roads are further giving me a hard time and I am thinking of upgrading to an ADV bike for city purpose under a budget of approximately Rs. 5 lakh. A pillion also accompanies me occasionally, however, I ride solo. Which bike should I upgrade to and should I even upgrade it right now or wait?

•3d

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 is a fantastic Swiss army knife of a motorcycle and will serve your needs well. It has sublime suspension comfort and its spacious ergonomics are great for carrying two people. Coming from a CB350, its liquid-cooled 452cc engine will also seem like a pretty substantial jump up in terms of performance. We'd wholeheartedly recommend splurging for the cross spoke laced wheels which bring in the convenience of tubeless tyres and even so, you'll be well under your budget. If you want to stick with Honda then we'd advise you to wait for the XR300 models to become available in dealers on a widespread basis (which will take 4-6 months) and then take a test ride of these to see if they are up your alley. Do bear in mind that the Himalayan is a proper adventure bike which means it will have better comfort and capability but will be significantly heavier, whereas the XR300s are focused, lightweight dualsport machines which will be less comfortable in terms of seating.

Royal Enfield Himalayan

•1w

I am confused between the Tata Sierra Pure petrol manual, Hyundai Creta S (Optional) petrol manual, and Kia Seltos HTK (Optional). I am getting all three for under Rs. 14 lakh on-road through CSD. I want a reliable car with low maintenance costs and an expected city mileage of 14-15 kmpl. I am also looking for a practical car for everyday use. Which one should I choose?

•2d

Go for the Kia Seltos HTK O petrol manual. This Kia car is the most balanced choice here, offering a proven ownership experience, good reliability and low maintenance costs. The 1.5 petrol is smooth, efficient and well suited to city driving, and Kia's service network is strong. The Seltos also offers a comfortable ride, a spacious cabin and a well-rounded feature set in the HTK O trim. The Tata Sierra is a more interesting product with a larger and more premium-feeling cabin, but Tata's service consistency is still not quite at Kia or Hyundai's level. The Creta is a good alternative, but the Seltos is the newer, larger car and is the better value proposition here. Overall, the Seltos is the safest and most practical choice for long-term ownership.

Should I go for Nexon EV, Mahindra XUV 3XO or Brezza 1.5 for 700km monthly running. I prefer automatic transmission.

•3d

With a monthly running of around 700km and a preference for an automatic, a petrol makes more sense. At this usage, the cost advantage of an EV is limited, and the Nexon EV only makes sense if you have home charging and significantly higher running. The Brezza 1.5 petrol automatic is a solid, reliable choice, but the 3XO offers a turbo petrol and better highway performance. Both cars use a 6-speed torque converter automatics which are smooth and well-suited to city driving. If your usage is primarily on the highway, the XUV 3XO is a better fit, but in mostly city use the Brezza will be more efficient.

Tata Nexon EV

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

Mahindra XUV 3XO

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•4d

I'm planning to purchase my first motorcycle and have narrowed down my options to the Bajaj Pulsar N160 SS and Dominar 250. My primary usage will be short daily commutes of approximately 5-6 km one way in Hyderabad's traffic (around 12km two way), with occasional longer rides. I'm a relatively new rider, so low-speed usability, manoeuvrability and ease of handling matter to me. The N160 SS appeals to me because of its lighter weight, Crawl Tech, TFT and city-friendly characteristics. However, the Dominar 400 has been my dream motorcycle for the past ten years, ever since it was launched in India while I was still in school. While the Dominar 400 remains my dream bike, the Dominar 250 seems like a reasonable compromise for my primarily urban use, offering some of that Dominar experience without going straight for the 400. I've ridden the Dominar 400 and found it surprisingly manageable and planted, but I haven't been able to test-ride the Dominar 250 because dealerships don't have test-ride units. I've also heard that the Dominar 250 lacks low-end urgency, requires frequent gear changes in slow traffic and is relatively heavy for city use. On the other hand, my uncle, who has owned a Dominar 400 for years and uses it in Hyderabad, has suggested that the Dominar 250 could be a reasonable choice for my requirements. The Dominar 250 is currently quoted at approximately Rs. 2.42 lakh (on-road), compared with around Rs. 1.86-1.94 lakh for the N160 SS. Given my usage, beginner experience and long-standing desire to own a Dominar, would you recommend the N160 SS as the more sensible long-term choice, or is the Dominar 250 a motorcycle that I could realistically grow into and enjoy despite its compromises? I would particularly appreciate your thoughts on low-speed tractability, bumper-to-bumper traffic, manoeuvrability for a beginner, and whether the Dominar's additional weight and cost are justified for someone whose riding will primarily be urban.

•3d

There's no doubt that the Bajaj Dominar 250 will fit the bill well for your needs as a first-time motorcyclist. However, what stops us from recommending it wholeheartedly is that the smaller Dominar sells in extremely microscopic numbers which means sometimes you'll be waiting a long time for a small part, leaving your bike out of action which is never a good thing. Truth be told, the Dominar 400 (especially since it is now powered by a downsized 349cc motor) is a perfectly acceptable first bike and since you have had an inclination towards the Dominar for a long time, why not go ahead and scratch and that itch! The only caveat here would be that the Dominar is a hefty machine, weighing 190kg, which can catch you off-guard at slow-speed scenarios but in time, you'll get used to it. On the other hand, if you don't want to deal with the extra weight and purchasing cost of the Dominar 400, then the Pulsar N160 SS is a very different but nonetheless, a great option for a beginner. It has a peppy engine, predictable handling, good comfort and comes with all the latest gizmos and gadgets that people these days want their two-wheelers to be festooned with. Not to mention, it will also be far more fuel efficient than the Dominar. These are 2 very different bikes which will give you starly different experiences so its best you take a test ride and see which one you're leaning towards more before you make your decision.

Which bike should I choose between the new KTM 390 Adventure, KTM 390 Duke and Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450? I am upgrading from a TVS Ronin 225, and I feel it lacks power on highways, especially while overtaking. I am also looking for a new riding experience. I am 5'3" tall and weigh 75kg. Please guide me on which bike would suit me best, considering my height, riding comfort and performance. Or would it be better to stick with the TVS Ronin?

•6d

Given your stature and the fact that you're coming from a Ronin, we'd recommend you choose between the 350cc KTM 390 Duke and the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 you've shortlisted. While both bikes have similar peak power outputs and pricing, they're poles apart to ride, so make sure you get a test ride before you go ahead with your purchase. The 390 Duke has sublime handling, great features and its 349cc engine loves chasing the redline but in day-to-day usage it feels like the machine that needs to be worked harder. Its suspension is also quite stiff (not harsh but definitely not plush) and there are quite a few vibes from the engine at almost all touch points no matter the revs you're at. If you don't care about refinement or comfort too much, and want all-out sporting thrills at a reasonable budget, then the 350cc Duke is something you should consider. If instead, you want your next purchase to be a bit more rounded to balance both usability and performance, then the RE Guerrilla 450 should be on your radar. The Guerrilla's 452cc engine's torquey nature makes it far more effortless to ride both in the city and on the highway, and its chassis is set up well for brisk road riding. It also has a lower 780mm perch (compared to the KTM's 800mm one) and its suspension is also set up to deal with road imperfections better. Ofcourse, it lacks the outright speed, handling, as well as the finessed electronics of the KTM, but for some people, this will actually be a plus point. Like we said at the outset, these are two very different bikes, so before making your decision, ensure you take a thorough test ride.

KTM 390 Duke

Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450

•1w

Hello, I am a resident of New Delhi and own a 2005 Hero Honda Karizma that is no longer permitted to run on Delhi roads. Since I live in an apartment complex, I have been able to keep the motorcycle parked within the premises. However, I would like to know whether there are any rules prohibiting me from keeping it parked there and whether the authorities can tow it away even if it is not being driven on public roads. I would appreciate any information or clarification on the applicable rules and regulations. Thank you in advance.

•6d

As a Delhi resident with a 2005 Hero Honda Karizma, the key issue is that your bike is now considered “unfit” under Delhi’s 15-year rule for petrol vehicles. This means it cannot be legally used on public roads, and the registration is effectively invalid. However, there is no blanket rule that says you cannot keep the bike parked inside your own apartment complex. The authorities are primarily concerned with such vehicles being used on public roads or in public parking areas, and if you do so, you can be fined and the vehicle towed and scrapped.If the bike has sentimental value, you can explore getting it registered as a vintage vehicle, which allows continued ownership and limited use under specific conditions. This process involves an application to the RTO and meeting certain criteria, including the bike being over 15 years old and in original condition. If you do not plan to use the bike and want to avoid any risk, the safest option is to deregister it and keep it purely as a display piece, or consider scrapping it through an authorised facility.

View all Posts

New bike launches to explore