Autocar India
EM

Emmanuel

8w

I am currently using a Tata Harrier and am very satisfied with it overall. Now, I am planning to upgrade and am considering two options: either going for the latest version of the Tata Harrier again or choosing the Mahindra XUV 7XO. Could you please advise which would be the better option?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
7w

While the facelift of the Tata Harrier received in 2023 was fairly substantial, it isn’t enough of an upgrade over your Harrier. Instead, we suggest you try something new and opt for the Mahindra XUV 7XO

It is a three-row SUV compared to the two-row Harrier, is better equipped with features such as a triple-screen setup as standard, and offers a more powerful diesel engine. 

Take a test drive of both SUVs before you decide.

Mahindra XUV 7XO

Mahindra XUV 7XO

AM

A m

7w

Go for harrier qwd ev

BS

Bhavesh Shroff

7w

XUV 7XO is best SUV

PR

Pritesh

7w

I own a xuv300 and from personal experience as well as from other friends and relatives experiences owning other m&m suvs, can tell you that mahindra service centers across India are a nightmare and their cars except scorpio classic require frequent visits there so if you are brave enough and battle ready for it, go for the 7xo

AN

Andy

6w

Owning both the Mahindra XUV700 and the Tata Safari, I still feel the Safari has the edge when it comes to suspension and ride quality. The XUV700 shines in the city with better mileage, power, and ease of driving. But on highways and rough roads, the Safari feels more stable, comfortable, and confidence-inspiring—even its ADAS feels more sorted. For me, city = XUV700, highways & bad roads = Safari.

HI

Himanshu

6w

My harrier round key remote do not work properly i. Consume battery in 10 days

SA

Sanjoy

7w

I have nexon petrol turbo and it's still going great even after 134000km. Now I am planning for upgrade- I have two cars in my mind- Tata Sierra turbo or Thar ROXX. Apart from that, can u pls suggest a sedan which will be having a punchy powerful engine with good drive comfort. I drive 40% city and 60% highway, also do cross state driving. My budget is somehow max 20-22L

CA

CarWise

6w

Your Tata Nexon petrol turbo has clearly proven its reliability, running strong even after 1.34 lakh km, which is impressive. For your upgrade, between the Tata Sierra turbo and Mahindra Thar ROXX, the Sierra is the better choice for your usage since you drive 60% on highways and need comfort, stability, and family practicality, whereas the Thar ROXX is more suited for off-road fun and less ideal for long highway journeys. If you are also considering a sedan within your ₹20–22 lakh budget, you should focus on turbo petrol options for a punchy and engaging drive. The Hyundai Verna 1.5 Turbo stands out as the most powerful and quickest in the segment, offering a great balance of performance and comfort. Alternatively, the Volkswagen Virtus GT and Skoda Slavia 1.5 TSI provide a more solid, German-style driving feel with excellent highway stability. The Honda City is the most comfortable and refined but lacks the same punch as the turbo options.

VD

Vinod D

7w

I have safari harrier and also xuv 700 at home . In my opinion if you want light sedan like drive go for xuv7x0

AV

Avinash

7w

If you are planning to go for 7X0 then you should start building your patience level. Because there manufacturing process is very slow. They committed to me that delivery will take 6 months now they are saying it will take 8 months.

More questions on similar cars

GC

GIRISH CHOUDHRY

1d

Dear Autocar, I am looking for a comfortable 5-seater SUV primarily for metro city driving (around 25-30 km per day) with very little highway usage. My current car is a Honda City. Please help me choose between the Tata Sierra and Tata Harrier, and also suggest any other models that would suit my requirements. Additionally, kindly recommend the most suitable variant based on fuel economy, safety, and comfort.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

Between the two Tata cars that you've shortlisted, go for the Sierra. Considering you will be using the SUV in the city, it's relatively more compact and easier to drive, with lighter controls, yet doesn't give up too much in terms of space. It also has more features than the Harrier, including a three-screen setup on the dashboard in top trims. Both cars have 5-star crash test ratings from Bharat NCAP, since safety is a concern for you. The Sierra also has an edge on comfort, with the softer, more compliant suspension setup, while the Harrier feels firm, comparatively.However, being large and heavy SUVs, neither is particularly good on fuel economy, especially if you drive mostly in the city. Tata's new 1.5-litre petrol engine feels smooth and powerful in both SUVs, but in our real-world tests, returned poor figures in the Sierra. The diesel might be the better choice if fuel economy is a criterion, though beware of the additional maintenance required, such as DPF regeneration.With mostly metro-city use at 25-30 km a day and rare highway runs, a strong-hybrid like the Maruti Suzuki Victoris might make more sense. It uses far less fuel in stop-go traffic, it is very quiet and smooth at low speeds, and it is easier to park than bigger SUVs. Coming from a Honda City, you will like how calm and smooth it feels, and the ride is comfortable over broken roads. Moreover, it too has received a 5-star crash test rating from Bharat NCAP. The trade-off is space, which isn't as much as you'll find in the Harrier or Sierra, and performance, which compared to the turbo-petrol engine, isn't as strong. For your usage though, we would recommend the Victoris strong hybrid.

VehicleTata Harrier
VehicleTata Sierra
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Victoris
SS

S Sinha

10w

I am planning to buy a premium SUV in the ₹30-40 lakh segment and prefer a model without captain seats. After test-driving the Toyota Hycross, Tata Safari, and Mahindra XUV 7XO, I have booked the XUV 7XO AX7L diesel automatic 2WD, which has a waiting period of around six months. However, I am not in a hurry. While the Safari offered a more spacious third row and better suspension, the XUV felt more powerful, and Mahindra has a better reputation for service compared to Tata. I dropped the Hycross because the VX(O) variant misses some features, has smaller tyres, and the interior does not feel like a significant upgrade over my Ecosport, despite the higher price. I initially chose diesel for better mileage, but I am now concerned about potential DPF-related issues, as nearly 80% of my driving will be in Bangalore city.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Your observations are correct, and the Mahindra XUV 7XO does feel like the most modern and luxurious of the three vehicles you have shortlisted. It certainly is the most emotion-driven choice, as it has the most powerful engine and the sharpest driving dynamics. However, you're also right about the need for DPF maintenance, which, with your 80 percent Bengaluru city usage, will require some extra effort. Moreover, if you are looking for efficiency, the XUV7XO - even the diesel - is not the right choice. Mahindra typically tunes its engines for performance over mileage, and if there is a mileage benefit to the diesel, it will be felt out on the highway, rather than in the city.Thus, if mileage is a concern, the Toyota Innova Hycross strong hybrid is a much better choice, with excellent figures irrespective of city or highway use. If your budget stretches to Rs 40 lakh, consider going for the higher ZX (O) variant, which gives you more creature comforts inside the cabin. And if service is a consideration, Toyota is on a much higher level than both other brands. It's also got the most spacious cabin, especially in the third row. It's not the most emotional or exciting choice, but when it comes to peace of mind, it's hard to fault.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
KP

Kalyan P

1d

I am planning to replace my Tata Nexon with a new car. I drive around 60 km daily in Bangalore city for my office commute, with no highway use. Can you please recommend a reliable, safe, and fuel-efficient car other than a Tata for my daily commute? My budget is around ₹25 lakh, and I would also like a recommendation for the most value-for-money variant.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4h

If you're only commuting in Bengaluru traffic with no highway use, the Maruti Victoris ZXI+ (O) Strong Hybrid fits your brief best. It is built for city use, is very fuel-efficient in stop-go traffic, and comes from a brand known for easy, low-stress ownership.In your kind of traffic, the strong-hybrid system spends a lot of time running on its electric motor. As a result, the car feels very smooth and quiet at low speeds and uses less fuel than a regular petrol automatic. The e-CVT removes the usual shift shocks, so crawling through traffic feels far less jerky. Moving from a Nexon, you will also appreciate the easy step-in height, good ground clearance for speed breakers, and the clear outward visibility. Maruti’s service network in Bengaluru is excellent, and the car also covers the essential safety basics with stability control and multiple airbags.There are a few trade-offs to keep in mind. The hybrid battery takes up a significant amount of boot space, so it is less spacious than some other cars of this size. It is also not particularly exciting to drive, if that matters to you.Alternatively, if you're open to the idea of an EV, you can also consider the Hyundai Creta Electric. The top-spec Excellence LR variant should fit within your budget. It is more spacious than the Victoris, arguably more comfortable, reliable, and uses no fuel. It is also exceptionally efficient among EVs in its class. The main drawback, of course, is charging, so you will need to ensure that you can install a charger at home.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Victoris
VehicleHyundai Creta Electric

Popular discussions right now

PS

P S RAHUL

1w

I am 60 years old and have booked the Toyota Innova Hycross top-end variant. My usage will be mostly within the city, along with 4-5 long trips every year. Is this the right choice for my needs, or should I consider any other options? I plan to continue doing long-distance drives comfortably over the next 10 years.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

You want a car that is comfortable in the city, easy to drive and capable of doing long trips for the next 10 years. The Toyota Innova Hycross fits this very well. The hybrid system makes it very smooth and quiet in city driving, and the automatic gearbox is effortless, which becomes more important with age. On highways, it is stable, comfortable and built for long-distance travel, which is what the Innova name has always stood for.What really works in your favour is long-term ownership. Toyota’s reliability, strong service network and resale value make it one of the safest bets if you plan to keep the car for many years. The Hycross also offers excellent space, easy ingress and egress and a comfortable ride, which are important for everyday use and for passengers as you grow older.

VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
PS

Peasant Sampan

1w

Hello Autocar, I am planning to buy a sedan, with almost 90% city usage. Please suggest a suitable option. Also, is it true that for my usage, naturally aspirated (NA) engines are better suited than turbo-petrol engines?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

For your usage, a naturally aspirated petrol with a CVT or IVT is the best fit. These setups are smoother, easier to drive in traffic and more predictable, which matters far more in city conditions than outright performance. So yes, in your case, NA engines are better suited than turbo petrol.The Hyundai Verna IVT stands out as the most well-rounded option for city driving. The engine is smooth, the IVT gearbox is very intuitive in stop-and-go traffic, and the overall driving experience is effortless. It feels refined and easy to live with daily.The Honda City Hybrid is worth considering if your running is high. It offers excellent fuel efficiency, strong performance and is very easy to drive in the city thanks to its hybrid system. However, it comes with a higher upfront cost, and the battery placement results in a higher boot floor, which slightly affects practicality.Compared to the Verna, the standard Honda City CVT is also an option, but the engine feels a bit noisier, and the gearbox is not as intuitive as the Verna’s IVT in everyday use.

VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleHonda City
RA

ram

3d

Hi, I am a bit confused about whether I should wait for the Maruti Brezza facelift or go ahead and buy the Kia Seltos HTE(O) or the Hyundai Creta E Summer Edition.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Going by your shortlist, you want a bigger family car on a tight budget and are looking at base trims. If you need the car in the next couple of months for mostly city use with some weekend trips, pick the Kia Seltos HTE (O) IVT. It is well equipped and, compared to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, gives you more back-seat space and boot room.The Brezza update will be relatively minor, though we expect the 1.5 NA engine to make way for the 1.0 turbo-petrol from the Fronx. Waiting for it only makes sense if you mainly drive in tight city areas and want an easier-to-park car.Overall, for a near-term purchase and everyday comfort, the Seltos lines up best with what you’re considering.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx

Posted on: 17 Mar 2026