Autocar India
•21w

I am currently using a 2017 Toyota Corolla and a 2014 diesel Innova. I am planning an upgrade and have my mind set on the new Mercedes E-Class. However, I am unsure whether to choose the E200 petrol or the E220d diesel. I would appreciate some advice.

Verified
•20w
Honestly, with Mercedes cars in general and the E-Class in particular, both petrol and diesel engine options are so capable that it's really a matter of preference which one you choose. The price difference is negligible, too. The E 200 petrol gets you slightly greater refinement, but that's about its only advantage.
The E 220d's OM654 1993cc, four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine is smooth, refined and, with 440Nm of torque, packs a decent punch too. Its biggest advantage, however, is the lower running costs, with the combined lower cost of diesel fuel, and the better fuel economy that could get you over 700km on a single tankful if you drive carefully.
Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Explore cars mentioned

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Mercedes-Benz

E-Class

from ₹95.61 Lakh

Compare suggested cars

More questions on similar cars

•1d

My daily running is around 30 km, mostly within Bangalore city, with a highway trip once every quarter of approximately 250-300 km. I am confused between the Honda City SV and the Tata Nexon Creative. I am a first-time driver, and my preferences, in order of priority, are reliability, safety, handling, comfort, and fuel efficiency. Which would be the best value-for-money option?

Verified
•10h

Pick the Honda City SV. With 30 km a day in Bengaluru traffic and quarterly 300 km runs, it will feel easier, smoother and cheaper to live with. Honda’s reliability and service consistency are stronger, the petrol is smoother in stop-go traffic, and you will see better mileage than the Nexon petrol. On the highway, the City sits more calmly at speed and its rear seat and ride comfort make those long trips less tiring.Safety is where the Nexon has the edge on paper, and its ground clearance and smaller footprint help over nasty speed breakers and tight parking. It also packs more features for the price. But your order of priorities puts reliability, handling, comfort and mileage before gadgets, and the City nails those every day.One honest caveat: the SV variant is light on features, and you must slow for big speed breakers with a full load. If that worries you more than fuel costs and smoothness, the Nexon Creative makes sense, but for your use, the City gives better long-term value.

VehicleHonda City
VehicleTata Nexon
•2d

Being 6 feet tall person with a budget within Rs. 10 lakh, I mostly commute in the city but also ride around 200 km on the highway every week. My priorities are reliability, after-sales service, fuel efficiency, and riding comfort. Which one should I choose between the Maruti Suzuki Fronx NA Petrol and the Tata Punch NA Petrol?

Verified
•11h

Go for the Fronx NA petrol, mainly for its smoother 4-cylinder engine and better efficiency, which will save you money in city traffic and feel calmer on your 200 km weekly highway run. Maruti’s reliability and service reach are still the easiest to live with, especially if you plan to keep the car long. For a 6ft driver the seat travel is good, cabin is wider than the Punch, and the Fronx feels more relaxed at 90-100 km/h with less engine noise.The Punch fights back with a higher driving position and a tougher, more absorbent ride on bad roads. But its 3-cylinder motor is noisier, needs more effort for highway overtakes, and real-world fuel use is usually higher. Tata’s service is improving but still inconsistent in many cities.If reliability, low running costs and everyday comfort matter most, the Fronx fits your brief better.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleTata Punch
•1d

I want to buy a 7-seater as a family car. My preferences are the Maruti Suzuki XL6, Kia Carens, Kia Carens Clavis, and Mahindra XEV. I previously owned a Hyundai i20 and currently drive a Volkswagen Polo. I like the comfort offered by Volkswagen and Hyundai. I do not take family trips very frequently, but we do travel about twice a year. Based on driving comfort, long-distance comfort for all passengers, and fuel efficiency, what would you suggest? Also, would an EV be a better option?

Verified
•10h

Pick the Kia Carens Clavis 7-seater, preferably with the diesel automatic, for the best mix of comfort and fuel efficiency. You like the calm, comfortable feel of Volkswagen and Hyundai car, and the Clavis comes closest to that, with a cushy ride, a quiet cabin and light controls that make city driving easy. On the two long trips you do each year, it keeps everyone happier with a roomy second row, a genuinely usable third row, strong air-conditioning and a stable highway feel. If your driving is largely restricted to the city, the petrol DCT would be the better choice, though it is not as smooth-shifting as the diesel automatic's torque-converter gearbox.An EV only makes sense if most of your driving is in the city and you can charge at home. In that case, the Carens Clavis EV’s smooth driving experience and very low running costs are worth it, though you will need to plan charging stops on those occasional highway trips.

VehicleKia Carens Clavis
VehicleKia Carens Clavis EV

View all Posts

Expert reviews worth reading

Mercedes-Benz E-Class
Mercedes-BenzE-Class
Read expert review

Popular discussions right now

•5d

My annual running is below 7,000 km, and I plan to keep my next car for 12-15 years. I am confused between Grand Vitara, Hyryder, Elevate, Creta, Seltos and Victoris. My priorities are reliability, a good balance of power and fuel efficiency, family comfort, low maintenance and long-term ownership. I am also concerned about India's future ethanol-blending policy (E20 and higher blends). Which of these would be the best long-term choice and why?

Verified
•4d

With an annual running of less than 7,000km, fuel efficiency should not be the deciding factor. Instead, you should focus on comfort, reliability, ownership experience and how well the car will age over the next 12-15 years. That's why we wouldn't prioritise the Grand Vitara, Hyryder or Victoris Hybrid. Their hybrid systems command a price premium that you'll struggle to recover with such low annual usage.Between the remaining options, the Kia Seltos strikes the best balance. It offers a refined and proven naturally aspirated petrol engine, a smooth IVT automatic, a spacious and premium cabin, excellent comfort and a strong ownership experience. It also feels newer and more upmarket than the Elevate, while the Creta is due for a generational update sooner.The Honda Elevate deserves a mention for its simplicity and reliability. If absolute mechanical simplicity is your priority, it is arguably the safest long-term bet. However, it doesn't feel as premium as the Seltos. The engine and CVT combination isn't quite as refined, and Honda's dealer network is smaller.As for ethanol blending, we wouldn't let it influence your purchase decision. While there is plenty of discussion around E25, E27 and E30 fuels, there is currently no confirmed roadmap for such a transition. More importantly, all of these cars are E20-compliant, and manufacturers have engineered a degree of tolerance beyond that. The most likely effect of higher ethanol blends would be a small reduction in fuel efficiency and slightly accelerated wear of certain fuel-system components over a very long period, not a major reliability issue.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleHonda Elevate
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Grand Vitara
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Victoris
VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder
•1w

I was planning to buy a Maruti Ignis, but it’s been discontinued. I prefer small cars for city driving and office commutes, but I also need something highway-capable for an occasional 900 km trip to my hometown. It will mostly carry three of us (my spouse, child, and me), but needs to fit five people when my parents join. With a 12-lakh budget, what are the best compact cars that balance city manoeuvrability, highway stability, and occasional 5-seater comfort?

Verified
•3d

Pick the Maruti Fronx turbo within your Rs. 12 lakh budget, because it stays easy to park in the city yet feels secure on a 900 km run with enough room for five. The 1.0 turbo has decent mid-range for quick overtakes, and the suspension is absorbent and yet keeps the car steady at highway speeds. If you are opting for the automatic, then the Fronx torque converter auto is a very smooth unit and will make life much easier in the city.If you want an even smaller, lighter car with lower running costs, go for the Maruti Swift. It is smooth in the city, easy on fuel, has a usable boot for three, and will cruise comfortably at 100. It can take five in a pinch, but it will feel tight on shoulder room and lack the highway punch of the turbo Fronx.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift
•5d

Dear Autocar experts, I have tentatively decided to buy the Mahindra XUV 7X0 petrol AX7L AT as my next ride. To be frank, it is out of a lack of choice and options that I have made this decision in my head. In terms of capability, it is a downgrade, as I'm moving on from my beautiful Ford Endeavour 3.2 Titanium AT. Of course, it has a long list of bells and whistles that will be all new (and strange) to me. Being based in Delhi NCR, I am reluctant to go for a diesel again at this time. My driving in the city is quite minimal, say about 15kms max per day on average, but always in the clutches of peak Delhi traffic. I am terrified of BSVI diesel DPF horror stories. I am hoping that the 7X0 will be able to negotiate hills, mountain terrains and roads satisfactorily, as I make these trips quite frequently. I plan to keep this car for the next 4-5 years till India sorts out its fuel preferences and diktats, and fresh options are introduced that combine clean energy and performance along with the infrastructure to support them. Is my thought process sound? If not, please poke as many holes in it as you can.

Verified
•4d

Your plan seems sound for Delhi-NCR, because petrol dodges the 10-year diesel cap and DPF hassles, and your 15 km daily crawl will not punish petrol the way it would a BS6 diesel. The XUV 7XO petrol AT has strong performance and will certainly keep you satisfied while negotiating hill climbs. Sure, coming from an Endeavour 3.2, this will feel like a step down in terms of road presence and off-road ability. However, despite being a front-wheel drive monocoque, it still exudes an underlying toughness, which gives you ample confidence while dealing with rough terrain. Additionally, the tech and safety are up-to-date, and the three-row flexibility will come in handy, too, although boot space with all three rows in place is low. On the flipside, this petrol-AT is thirsty, so expect single-digit city fuel economy figures.If you aren't in a hurry, consider waiting for the Jetour T2 plug-in hybrid SUV that JSW is expected to launch in the latter half of this year. Sure, it'll be more expensive than the Mahindra, and it might not have the off-road capability of your outgoing Endeavour, but since you aren't fully convinced of the Mahindra, this could be worthy of your consideration.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleJSW Motors Jetour T2

View all Posts

Posted on: 4 Feb 2026