Autocar India
AS

Avinash shirakol

7w

I am confused about whether to buy the 3XO or the Nexon. I need a reliable car with good engine performance.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
7w
We would suggest you go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 1.2 TGDi, preferably with the 6-speed automatic. Given your priorities of reliability and strong engine performance, it is the most satisfying car to drive. The big highlight is the 1.2-litre TGDi turbo-petrol engine that produces 130hp and 230Nm of torque, which is among the strongest outputs in this segment. In comparison, the petrol engine in the Tata Nexon produces around 120hp and 170Nm. That’s roughly 35% more torque in the Mahindra, and you can feel it in everyday driving, especially in the mid-range where overtakes happen. The 3XO simply feels punchier and more effortless when you press the throttle.
If you are considering an automatic, the Mahindra again has an advantage. The 3XO uses a 6-speed torque-converter automatic (from Aisin), which tends to be smoother and more durable in heavy traffic and hot conditions, the kind we typically experience in India.
The Nexon petrol automatic, on the other hand, uses a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCA). While dual-clutch gearboxes can shift quickly, they can also feel jerky at low speeds and tend to be less tolerant of stop-and-go traffic over the long term.
Another point in favour of the 3XO is that this mStallion turbo petrol engine family has been around for several years, so it’s relatively well understood in the market. Mahindra also offers a 3-year/1,00,000km warranty, which can typically be extended up to 5 or even 7 years, giving additional peace of mind. You should confirm the exact coverage and extension options with the dealer.
The main compromise with the 3XO is practicality. Its boot is smaller than the Nexon’s, roughly 360 litres versus about 380 litres in the Nexon. So, if you regularly travel with large luggage, you may have to plan a bit more carefully.
BS

Bil Sangeeth

7w

AX5 models doesn’thave tgdi. It is TCMPFI a indirect fuel injector. Only AX7 and AX7L have 1.2 tgdi

BS

Bil Sangeeth

7w

I’m not saying that’s bad, but something to keep in mind if you are an enthusiast. You’ll notice some difference in power delivery

SA

Sangeeta

7w

That’s not correct..AX5 L has tgdi

SK

SANJEEV KUMAR

6w

IAM WAITING

BH

Bhanu

6w

Hai... looking for a good and excellent micro SUV or mid SUV to accommodate 5 members with comfort. Good ground clearance, decent leg room and boot space are required. The brand and model should have been widely accepted reflected in sales figures.

MS

Mythical solution

6w

First priority- tata punch 2nd priority- Hyundai venue

SB

Sundar B

7w

Ax5L is tgdi

SA

Santhosh

7w

My driving experience Mahindra 3XO best car

MA

Mr Arya

7w

Per my driving experience overall I would suggest to go ahead with 3XO

PS

Ps

7w

Hello O planning to buy a car among tata punch facelift vs nexon which will be best kindly suggest

More questions on similar cars

MP

Mayu Patil

21h

I am planning to buy a new SUV with a budget of ₹12-14 lakh and am confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX Petrol and the Skoda Kylaq Manual Petrol. My monthly running is quite high at around 2,500 km, including approximately 1,600 km on highways and 800 km in the city. Which of these offers better real-world mileage in such driving conditions? Which would be more cost-effective for long-term maintenance, considering the high yearly running? With an annual usage of nearly 30,000 km, should I continue with these petrol options, or would the diesel XUV 3XO be a more logical and financially sensible choice?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
16h

With a Rs 12-14 lakh budget, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 diesel manual is the smarter pick for you because your running is high and most of it is on open roads where a diesel saves a lot of fuel. On your first question, between the two petrols you named - the Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol and the Skoda Kylaq - the Kylaq 1.0 TSI manual usually gives slightly better real-world mileage on long highway drives if you cruise at steady speeds. In city use, they’re closer, and of course choosing the automatic gearbox of either will lower the mileage figures further. Turbo petrols in general are highly sensitive to your driving style when it comes to the real-world mileage they deliver. But Mahindra tends to prioritise performance over fuel economy in its engines.On long-term costs, Skoda has 15,000km service gaps, so you’d likely do two services a year. Mahindra typically calls you in a little sooner, so you may do three. Per visit, Skoda parts and fluids can be a touch pricier, while Mahindra parts are usually cheaper, and the network is wider. Over 30,000km a year, the rupee-per-km on the two petrols ends up similar, with a slight edge to Mahindra.Given your third point, yes - at 30,000 km a year, the XUV 3XO diesel manual makes stronger financial sense. It will use a lot less fuel on highways and has an easy pull for overtaking. The only caveat is that diesel cars have a soot filter that requires regular highway runs to regenerate or clean. But your usage pattern suits this well. Overall, for your mix, the 3XO diesel fits best.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleSkoda Kylaq
KA

Kapil

3d

I am confused between choosing a manual or automatic car, and also between the Skoda Kylaq, Mahindra XUV 3XO, and Toyota Taisor/Maruti Fronx. My daily driving is about 8 km in the city, along with a monthly highway trip of over 250 km.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

With an 8 km daily city run and one 250 km-plus highway trip a month, go automatic to keep life easy in traffic and still be relaxed on the highway. From your list, the Skoda Kylaq petrol automatic fits you best. It is smooth to drive in stop-start traffic, has strong pull for quick overtakes on your monthly trip, and its compact size makes parking and narrow lanes less stressful.The Kylaq’s ride is comfortable on rough patches, and it feels steady at highway speeds. You also get a good spread of safety and convenience features even in mid trims, which helps on long runs.Trade-offs to note: the cabin can feel a little cramped for rear-seat passengers. If that is a concern, then look at the Mahindra XUV 3XO instead. The Taisor/Fronx turbo-petrols are solid choices too, with better fuel efficiency than the Kylaq, but they will feel a little older on the inside.Overall, for your pattern, the Kylaq petrol automatic is a good choice.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Taisor
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VI

Vinod

2d

I am upgrading from a Tata Tigor and am confused between the Mahindra 3XO AX5L petrol and the Tata Nexon DCA. My usage is primarily city driving, averaging around 700 km per month. Could you please help me choose the better option for my needs?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Mostly city driving at about 700 km a month and moving up from a Tata Tigor - in that use, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 L petrol automatic is the stronger fit. It's automatic is a torque-converter type, which means it changes gears smoothly and feels calm at very low speeds. The driving position is higher than your Tigor, visibility is good, and the AX5 L gives you easy-to-use screens and parking aids you will want every day.The Tata Nexon DCA is still a solid choice. It has a roomier back seat and a bigger boot. But its DCA gearbox, which is a dual-clutch that shifts very quickly when you speed up, can feel a bit hesitant when you inch forward in heavy traffic. It is not a deal-breaker, but for a primarily city user like you, the Mahindra’s calmer behaviour at low speed matters more.Two trade-offs with the 3XO to keep in mind: the back seat and boot are not as spacious as the Nexon’s. Overall, for mostly city use, the XUV 3XO AX5 L petrol lines up best with what you described.

VehicleTata Tigor
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleTata Nexon

Popular discussions right now

PS

P S RAHUL

1w

I am 60 years old and have booked the Toyota Innova Hycross top-end variant. My usage will be mostly within the city, along with 4-5 long trips every year. Is this the right choice for my needs, or should I consider any other options? I plan to continue doing long-distance drives comfortably over the next 10 years.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

You want a car that is comfortable in the city, easy to drive and capable of doing long trips for the next 10 years. The Toyota Innova Hycross fits this very well. The hybrid system makes it very smooth and quiet in city driving, and the automatic gearbox is effortless, which becomes more important with age. On highways, it is stable, comfortable and built for long-distance travel, which is what the Innova name has always stood for.What really works in your favour is long-term ownership. Toyota’s reliability, strong service network and resale value make it one of the safest bets if you plan to keep the car for many years. The Hycross also offers excellent space, easy ingress and egress and a comfortable ride, which are important for everyday use and for passengers as you grow older.

VehicleToyota Innova HyCross
PS

Peasant Sampan

6d

Hello Autocar, I am planning to buy a sedan, with almost 90% city usage. Please suggest a suitable option. Also, is it true that for my usage, naturally aspirated (NA) engines are better suited than turbo-petrol engines?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

For your usage, a naturally aspirated petrol with a CVT or IVT is the best fit. These setups are smoother, easier to drive in traffic and more predictable, which matters far more in city conditions than outright performance. So yes, in your case, NA engines are better suited than turbo petrol.The Hyundai Verna IVT stands out as the most well-rounded option for city driving. The engine is smooth, the IVT gearbox is very intuitive in stop-and-go traffic, and the overall driving experience is effortless. It feels refined and easy to live with daily.The Honda City Hybrid is worth considering if your running is high. It offers excellent fuel efficiency, strong performance and is very easy to drive in the city thanks to its hybrid system. However, it comes with a higher upfront cost, and the battery placement results in a higher boot floor, which slightly affects practicality.Compared to the Verna, the standard Honda City CVT is also an option, but the engine feels a bit noisier, and the gearbox is not as intuitive as the Verna’s IVT in everyday use.

VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleHonda City
RA

ram

3d

Hi, I am a bit confused about whether I should wait for the Maruti Brezza facelift or go ahead and buy the Kia Seltos HTE(O) or the Hyundai Creta E Summer Edition.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Going by your shortlist, you want a bigger family car on a tight budget and are looking at base trims. If you need the car in the next couple of months for mostly city use with some weekend trips, pick the Kia Seltos HTE (O) IVT. It is well equipped and, compared to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, gives you more back-seat space and boot room.The Brezza update will be relatively minor, though we expect the 1.5 NA engine to make way for the 1.0 turbo-petrol from the Fronx. Waiting for it only makes sense if you mainly drive in tight city areas and want an easier-to-park car.Overall, for a near-term purchase and everyday comfort, the Seltos lines up best with what you’re considering.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx

Posted on: 18 Mar 2026