Autocar India
RA

Rajesh

13w

Before I begin, I would like to thank Autocar for always offering sensible and well-informed advice to its readers. I have been an Autocar India subscriber since 2002. As per your earlier advice, I am considering the 49 kWh battery version of the Maruti Suzuki e Vitara for my monthly usage of around 900 km in Bengaluru. For longer journeys, I already own a Toyota Hycross Hybrid, so the EV will primarily be used for city driving. My main confusion is regarding the performance difference between the 49 kWh and 61 kWh battery versions. I recently test-drove the 61 kWh variant and drove it for about 20 km, and I must say it was a joy to drive and handled very well probably the best-handling Maruti I have experienced. However, I am concerned whether the 49 kWh version, which comes with a smaller motor, might feel noticeably less powerful or subdued in performance compared to the 61 kWh version, even though the torque figure is said to be the same for both.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
12w

Thanks for being a loyal subscriber. 

As you've rightly mentioned, the Maruti Suzuki e Vitara gets two versions 144hp/189Nm motor with a 49kWh battery, and the other is 174hp/189Nm motor, 61kWh battery. The common factor between the two versions is the 189Nm motor torque, which makes it zippy. 

Of course, being more powerful, the larger battery version is likely to hit higher (three-digit) speeds more quickly, but within town (up to speeds of 60-70kph), the difference between their acceleration is likely to be negligible. 

So opt for the 61kWh version only if you need more range, else as a city commuter, the 49kWh version's performance should be more than sufficient.

Maruti Suzuki e Vitara

Maruti Suzuki e Vitara

VI

Vivek

12w

I am interested in Xuv 7xo diesel automatic L edition. My car will stay around 4 to 5 months in garage since i am working in Navy. Is there any issue for engine if not running (idle)for 4 to 5 ? Once i will back will run around 2k / month. Petrol version i heard is very poor mileage so not interested. Please suggest n advice. Thanks

More questions on similar cars

MJ

MJ

1d

I am planning to buy a car. My maximum budget is 12 lakhs. I will use the car occasionally for family purposes, with monthly usage between 200 and 1,000 km. It’s my first time buying a car. By researching online, I have selected the Mahindra 3XO AX5 MT and Venue HX 5 +(1.0L Turbo Petrol MT). Are there any more options? Which one should I buy?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2h

The Hyundai Venue HX 5+ 1.0 Turbo Petrol MT would be the first recommendation. It is easy to drive, has a well-sorted turbo-petrol engine, a strong service network and a proven ownership experience. For a first-time buyer, Hyundai's wider and more consistent aftersales support is a significant advantage. It is also easier to live with on a daily basis than some rivals.The Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 MT would be the second choice. It offers stronger performance, a wider cabin and feels more substantial on the road. However, its boot space is relatively small for family travel, which could become a limitation on occasional holiday trips with luggage. While Mahindra's service network has improved considerably, Hyundai still enjoys an edge in reach and consistency.One other option worth considering is the Maruti Suzuki Brezza Manual. Its naturally aspirated petrol engine may not feel as punchy or exciting as the turbocharged Venue or 3XO, and it is not as feature-rich either. However, for a first-time buyer, it remains one of the easiest SUVs to drive. The clutch is light, the gearbox is slick and progressive, and the ownership experience is among the most stress-free in the segment.

VehicleHyundai Venue
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
NA

Naveen

22h

I am buying the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T Diesel Automatic. My annual usage is approximately 12,000-13,000km with this pattern: Highway (guaranteed): approximately 6,000km annually. City: Weekend drives of minimum 15-20km, one 150km City exploration monthly. No daily office commute by car — public transport for that. The car will sit idle Monday to Friday. The authorised Mahindra workshop is 3km from home. My questions: 1. Is my pattern low-risk or high-risk for DPF issues? 2. Does the car sitting idle on weekdays followed by 15-20km weekend drives create cumulative soot risk? 3. Diesel AT or Petrol AT for my profile - which do you recommend? I am leaning toward Diesel AT, but want expert validation before booking

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
9h

Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO diesel automatic. Your guaranteed highway running every year is exactly what a DPF likes, and the diesel will be cheaper to run and nicer to cruise with its strong torque. With your usage, the diesel should return clearly better highway economy than the petrol and feel more relaxed on long trips.Your pattern is low-risk for DPF trouble. Those steady highway stretches will keep the filter clean via passive regen, and Mahindra’s active regen will step in if needed. A workshop 3 km away also means any rare forced regen is easy to sort.The car sitting Monday to Friday does not create soot. Soot builds only when driving, especially on repeated cold starts with short, crawling trips. Your weekend 15-20 km runs are long enough to get the exhaust hot unless they are pure bumper-to-bumper. The monthly 150 km city loop adds a good safety margin.Between diesel AT and petrol AT for you, diesel wins. Expect lower fuel costs on highways and stronger pull when loaded.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO

Expert reviews worth reading

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

3d

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 11 Mar 2026